October 19th, 2018 3:29 PM TESTIMONIALISM IS THE CORE INSIGHT OF PROPERTARIANISM [M]ost of the work is dependent upon the completion of the scientific method, and its restatement as due diligence in the production of testimony such that one can (and by law) must, provide a warrant of due diligence for one’s speech. This allows us to extend the demand for involuntary warranty of due diligence from goods and services to information (speech) ending the industrialization of lying that we know as marxism-feminism-postmodernism of the academy-state-media complex. The this ‘checklist’ and the ‘grammars’ are a substantial innovation, and they are unfortunately a bit harder to grasp and internalize than acquisitionism (psychology restated as desire to acquire property in toto), and propertarianism (ethics restated as voluntary transfer of property). The rest, (operational law, rule of law, and perfect government) are not that complicated.
Form: Short Note
-
(Morons irritate me. Apologies.)
(Morons irritate me. Apologies.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 16:08:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053316932760453121
-
(Morons irritate me. Apologies.)
(Morons irritate me. Apologies.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 12:08:00 UTC
-
SIMPLE BUT DEEP China is using Singapore as a micro model, and Singapore is the
SIMPLE BUT DEEP
China is using Singapore as a micro model, and Singapore is the biggest advocate of state capitalism.
Lee Kwan Yu once said there are two reasons for Asia’s economic success: state capitalism and the US Navy.
Asia can’t go to war as long as the US Navy patrols the Pacific and South China Sea. And, of course, the trade routes are open.
–by Sean Ring
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 10:34:00 UTC
-
CHINA HAS SUCCEEDED WITH NATIONAL SOCIALISM (I’m gonna ride this wave for a bit)
CHINA HAS SUCCEEDED WITH NATIONAL SOCIALISM
(I’m gonna ride this wave for a bit)
State Capitalism with zero tolerance for opposition is simply National Socialism – something that the intelligentsia (“The Commentariat of the Proletariat”) will have a hard time swallowing. It’s as important as the NPC meme.
All states are turning to fascism (intolerant nationalism), and mixed economies, with the state investing in core industries, using fiat money (shares in the economy) as a money substitute, and therefore a means of providing incentive (pull) rather than direction (push).
THE NAZIS WON – No one is yet willing to admit it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 10:11:00 UTC
-
THE SPECTRUM OF INTERPRETABILITY (ERROR) Thus the problem of literature vs philo
THE SPECTRUM OF INTERPRETABILITY (ERROR)
Thus the problem of literature vs philosophy, vs science vs mathematics : a decline in ‘interpretation’ due to the increasing precision of the vocabulary and grammar.
Unfortunately humnans (children) are most accessible and suggestible at the left of that scale, and least suggestible but least accessible at the right.
|| LIterary analogy > rational philosophy > economics > cognitive science > physics > mathematics.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 07:28:00 UTC
-
lolz. The fact that the liberals don’t ‘get’ the ‘inner monolog’ observation as
lolz. The fact that the liberals don’t ‘get’ the ‘inner monolog’ observation as evidence they don’t get the function of inner monologs… the irony is painful.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 23:18:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053062913232171011
-
lolz. The fact that the liberals don’t ‘get’ the ‘inner monolog’ observation as
lolz. The fact that the liberals don’t ‘get’ the ‘inner monolog’ observation as evidence they don’t get the function of inner monologs… the irony is painful.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 19:18:00 UTC
-
Who told me to read Gómez Dávila’s “De Iure”? Great tip. I can’t think like a la
Who told me to read Gómez Dávila’s “De Iure”? Great tip. I can’t think like a latin but he’s sure close.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 18:47:00 UTC
-
I Use “Grammars”…
October 18th, 2018 1:24 PM I USE “GRAMMARS” (EVERYTHING) RATHER THAN LANGUAGE (VOCABULARY) BUT, YES.
—“In other words, neurological operations still utilize a framework of object interactions which fundamentally constitutes that which qualifies as language. This doesn’t refer to orally spoken language but it can theoretically be described and articulated when we are not ignorant”—George Perceval
I use the terms ‘grammars‘ rather than language because that’s the correct term, but by analogy, yes.