photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46094604_10156774327042264_8638272919908122624_n_10156774327037264.jpg

Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 21:56:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46094604_10156774327042264_8638272919908122624_n_10156774327037264.jpg

Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 21:56:00 UTC
Ok. Stupid meter overloaded. Time for movies.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 19:30:00 UTC
( jeez don’t get pissed at me if I’m short with you in email or text or whatever. I’m sort ’cause I can’t be anything else. FB provides a lot of context. i can see previous conversations, see the context of the comment, and grab a quick look at your profile. In email and other media i am flying blind. And I’m awfully prolific and I can’t spend five minutes figuring out ‘who are you and what the heck are you talking about’. I just want to know what you want and what you need me to do.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 16:57:00 UTC
THE ECONOMICS OF GENDER
—“the Hermetic principle. Gender exists within everything. Male, female, hard, soft, light, dark. The similarities between his comparisons are characteristics of gender.”–Bradley Morgan
Um.. how would you state that scientifically: I can, in that the computational efficiency (calculation of successful specialization) of genders (two of them) defeated all other permutations and the additional calculative variation of additional genders seems to NOT provide enough additional value to compete with two genders. There is an argument that male and female cognitive structures in humans produce a spectrum from extremes of either end to a balance, and that this allows us to calculate the exploitation of a wider variety of opportunities than rigid specialization would. This is possibly the optimum method of evolutionary progress because we do not require the cost of a third or more gender, but we can still produce adaptive responses and express them anywhere between the extremes.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 15:16:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 04:19:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061835898969616384
I dunno but given aussie interest in my work i’m thinking you gents are gonna make it happen there without much effort….
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 02:36:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061809834750828550
Reply addressees: @StirlingFinn
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061809057483284480
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061809057483284480
Let’s be clear. I want a civil war. We need one. And within 18 months.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 01:40:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061795961956167680
(fyi: james is a fking machine. i could spend my day quoting his pm’s. its like a propaganda and counter signal firehose, lol seriously. i chat more with him than everyone else combined. and mostly i listen. its genius running commentary on the conduct of information warfare… lol. except its so brutal lol)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 22:36:00 UTC
https://scienceblog.com/504280/the-new-face-of-south-american-people/NORTH AMERICAN AMERINDIANS GENOCIDED THEIR PREDECESSORS
https://scienceblog.com/504280/the-new-face-of-south-american-people/
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 21:58:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 21:16:00 UTC