–“Curt, don’t you think we should remove Taleb from the recommended people list?”– Ahmed Reda
Um. we must forgive our friends for their occasional idiocy. Otherwise we will have no friends….
😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 13:51:00 UTC
Form: Short Note
-
“Curt, don’t you think we should remove Taleb from the recommended people list?”
-
This is what the market wants, and no one will build it. Forget the soft top. ma
This is what the market wants, and no one will build it. Forget the soft top. make it hard top only (better security anyway), and aside from the axles and tires its a pretty cheap vehicle that will literally go anywhere. You don’t need 500 hp in these vehicles. You just need to know you can go thru sand, snow, water and brush with them at the cost of expensive tires and brakes ever 50k miles.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 12:57:00 UTC
-
You know, the argument that we all make rational choices and cannot make irratio
You know, the argument that we all make rational choices and cannot make irrational choices, which is why we can subjectively test one another’s incentives. The same applies to reciprocity. morality can’t be OTHER reciprocity, because it would be irrational, accounting for all. https://twitter.com/MusaVaino/status/1083163450178707456
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 00:55:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083165376412876802
-
There are enough of us already. People who talk online are NEGATIVELY CORRELATED
There are enough of us already. People who talk online are NEGATIVELY CORRELATED with action, while people who are angry and silent are POSITIVELY CORRELATED with action. I don’t care about online and ideas. I care about real world and institutional solutions.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-09 22:11:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083124251702509573
Reply addressees: @DataDistribute
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083110170002182157
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083110170002182157
-
We are gonna have to go to war men. Not much else to be done
We are gonna have to go to war men.
Not much else to be done.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-09 20:01:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083091353532329985
-
True. High performance … long term significant other … said that she didn’t
True. High performance … long term significant other … said that she didn’t like morning sex because she felt like relaxing around the house all day afterward, and nothing got done.
I’m just the opposite. Morning sex and I am ‘balanced’ all day long. lol
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-09 18:38:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083070631921549313
Reply addressees: @JoseNoway1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083062387740012544
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083062387740012544
-
We are gonna have to go to war men. Not much else to be done
We are gonna have to go to war men.
Not much else to be done.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-09 15:01:00 UTC
-
What I love about open source? —“Well then, I can fix it my own damn self!!!”-
What I love about open source?
—“Well then, I can fix it my own damn self!!!”—
Lost more than half a day.
fking bug in the source after I’ve spent weeks on setting up the site for courses.
And the dev acts like a dev… sigh. Meaning he has (understandably) forgotten the entire context of what he wrote, and so I’m combing thru source of three versions of the software, the addon, and the addon that links the addon…
And saying … ‘um… here is where the bug is… and that function doesn’t exist, and it’s crashing because that function doesn’t exist’, and even if it did why are you calling the same date using two different methods in the first place?
Fixed. sigh….
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-09 13:53:00 UTC
-
Yes, The Paradigm is Difficult.
January 8th, 2019 12:34 PM [Y]es. I know the propertarian paradigm is difficult. Propertarianism = Natural Law = The completion of the scientific method = the reformation of the social sciences from pseudosciences to hard sciences = algorithmic, strictly constructed, common law of reciprocity, testimonial speech, and the warranty of due diligence of that speech = the means of constructing a scientific government = an explanation of the west’s success in the ancient and modern worlds, and the west’s survival from semitic, abrahamism. It used to be that the idea of science was as difficult as this idea of social science. Sorry. Paradigm shifts of this scale are just hard.
-
Yes, The Paradigm is Difficult.
January 8th, 2019 12:34 PM [Y]es. I know the propertarian paradigm is difficult. Propertarianism = Natural Law = The completion of the scientific method = the reformation of the social sciences from pseudosciences to hard sciences = algorithmic, strictly constructed, common law of reciprocity, testimonial speech, and the warranty of due diligence of that speech = the means of constructing a scientific government = an explanation of the west’s success in the ancient and modern worlds, and the west’s survival from semitic, abrahamism. It used to be that the idea of science was as difficult as this idea of social science. Sorry. Paradigm shifts of this scale are just hard.