Form: Short Note

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-17 11:55:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50297101_10156923013717264_104878123

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50297101_10156923013717264_104878123

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50297101_10156923013717264_104878123501223936_o_10156923013712264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50338228_10156923013937264_8934635236814225408_n_10156923013932264.jpg “A Good Quote is a Gift That Keeps On Giving.”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-17 11:50:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50576440_10156923009872264_307056875

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50576440_10156923009872264_307056875

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50576440_10156923009872264_3070568752379592704_o_10156923009867264.jpg Now it’s ready. ;)Bobby McManusThis gave me chills. I feel like I can finally start sharing some of the message when it’s packaged this way.Jan 17, 2019, 10:36 PMShane Markwhat does civil wrongs have to do with the scientific methodJan 18, 2019, 10:28 AMCurt DoolittleThat’s the cool part.Jan 18, 2019, 12:12 PMShane MarkI have a law degree and i still don’t understand.Jan 19, 2019, 5:31 AMCurt Doolittle^If it wasn’t excruciatingly difficult, someone would have done it before me. Instead, a host of intellectuals during the late 19th through mid 20th tried and failed. But since that time we’ve had computer science (existential) instead of mathematics (ideal), and cognitive science (existential) instead of psychology (pseudoscience), and economics (real) instead of sociology (pseudoscience). There are lots of shoulders of giants to stand upon in the late 20th and early 21st when I’m working.

    It’s possible to create strictly constructed law on one hand that is testable by computer software, and a chain of dependency that is testable by computer, and to provide the law, prosecutors, lawyers, judges, and the jury with a set of tests for truthful speech – which cannot be performed by computer.

    Law of tort is quite good really. Legislation and regulation are reasonably good in the anglo (common law) tradition. We just need these tools, universal standing in matters of the commons, thereby ending disintermediation by the state, and providing a via negativa means of competition (court) in addition to the via-positiva means of competition (markets).

    Now, increase the definition and scope of property (see property-in-toto) to the full suite of things that people act to invest in producing whether by expenditure of forgone opportunity, or expenditure of time, effort, or resources, (including manners, ethics, morals, norms, commons, capital et all) and it is very hard for special interests (and usurpers) to survive. And even more so, nearly impossible to seek rents (more on that another time.)

    Eradicate false and ir-reciprocal commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational speech in the commons. Restore libel and slander. Prohibit baiting into moral hazard in the law. Replace copyright with creative commons. Eliminate consumer interest (yes, really, and it’s not hard). Privatize (contract out) all bureaucratic functions. Replace private pensions with public (they aren’t possible anyway in current and future economies)…. Much more but all of it is rather ordinary.Jan 19, 2019, 9:01 AMNow it’s ready. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-17 11:47:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/nemewx/scientists-just-made-human-egg-cells-from-human-blood-for-the-first-timehttps://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/nemewx/scientists-just-made-human-egg-cells-from-human-blood-for-the-first-time


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-16 17:46:00 UTC

  • How much longer are we going to have to tolerate butt-hurt libertarians? Give it

    How much longer are we going to have to tolerate butt-hurt libertarians?

    Give it up kids. Malinvestment like the rest of us. Move on.

    PATH OF MATURITY

    Democrat > Classical Liberal > Libertarian > Anarcho Capitalism > Neo Reaction > Propertarianism.

    Propertarianism = Perfect Government.

    1) Algorithmic Natural Law, and an Independent Judiciary of the law, and a ready, trained, militia.

    2) Choose: Nationalistic (eugenic) or Anti-Nationalistic (dysgenic)

    3) Choose your means of producing commons:

    Monarchic, Oligarchy (senate), Classical LIberal (classes), Social Democratic, Direct Democracy. Direct Economic Democracy.

    4) Choose your method of education (mindfulness(religion), ethics (manners, ethics, morals, laws), methods of calculation, general knowledge, occupational skills.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 18:53:00 UTC

  • We don’t ask you to ‘believe’ in anything. We ask you to apply the method and re

    We don’t ask you to ‘believe’ in anything. We ask you to apply the method and refrain from causing harm to the physical, institutional, and informational, both private and common. And we’d prefer it if you also did your duty and demanded the same of others.

    It is a method that will change you first before you change your environment and you begin to change others. You will make it your own.

    And once the lightbulb goes on the world will be a much more simple and understandable place.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 18:09:00 UTC

  • Untitled


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 14:31:00 UTC

  • IT’S ALL JUST IMPLEMENTING IT NOW. Watching the talk with Augustus Invictus and

    IT’S ALL JUST IMPLEMENTING IT NOW.

    Watching the talk with Augustus Invictus and Richard Heathen and realizing that it’s obvious to me that propertarianism is ‘COMPLETED’. I was talking to someone this morning who said “You are finished. I can see it in your eyes. you aren’t struggling to find words or means of communicating ideas any longer.” Nick said this a bit ago so I assume he noticed first. But yeah, the cake is baked. Fork in it. Complete. Ready to go. Ready for way.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 12:24:00 UTC

  • RELATIVE COSTS AND INCOME BALANCE OUT MAJOR DIFFERENCES IS NOT STATE BUT URBAN V

    RELATIVE COSTS AND INCOME BALANCE OUT

    MAJOR DIFFERENCES IS NOT STATE BUT URBAN VS RURAL

    Alabama

    Median household income: $44,765

    Regional price parity out of 100: 86.8

    Real income: $51,573

    Alaska

    Median household income: $73,355

    Regional price parity out of 100: 105.6

    Real income: $69,465

    Arizona

    Median household income: $51,492

    Regional price parity out of 100: 96.2

    Real income: $53,526

    Arkansas

    Median household income: $41,995

    Regional price parity out of 100: 87.4

    Real income: $48,049

    California

    Median household income: $64,500

    Regional price parity out of 100: 113.4

    Real income: $56,878

    Colorado

    Median household income: $63,909

    Regional price parity out of 100: 103.2

    Real income: $61,927

    Connecticut

    Median household income: $71,346

    Regional price parity out of 100: 108.7

    Real income: $65,636

    Delaware

    Median household income: $61,255

    Regional price parity out of 100: 100.4

    Real income: $61,011

    District of Columbia

    Median household income: $75,628

    Regional price parity out of 100: 117

    Real income: $64,639

    Florida

    Median household income: $49,426

    Regional price parity out of 100: 99.5

    Real income: $49,674

    Georgia

    Median household income: $51,244

    Regional price parity out of 100: 92.6

    Real income: $55,339

    Hawaii

    Median household income: $73,486

    Regional price parity out of 100: 118.8

    Real income: $61,857

    Idaho

    Median household income: $48,275

    Regional price parity out of 100: 93.4

    Real income: $51,686

    Illinois

    Median household income: $59,588

    Regional price parity out of 100: 99.7

    Real income: $59,767

    Indiana

    Median household income: $50,532

    Regional price parity out of 100: 90.7

    Real income: $55,713

    Iowa

    Median household income: $54,736

    Regional price parity out of 100: 90.3

    Real income: $60,616

    Kansas

    Median household income: $53,906

    Regional price parity out of 100: 90.4

    Real income: $59,631

    Kentucky

    Median household income: $45,215

    Regional price parity out of 100: 88.6

    Real income: $51,033

    Louisiana

    Median household income: $45,727

    Regional price parity out of 100: 90.6

    Real income: $50,471

    Maine

    Median household income: $51,494

    Regional price parity out of 100: 98

    Real income: $52,545

    Maryland

    Median household income: $75,847

    Regional price parity out of 100: 109.6

    Real income: $69,203

    Massachusetts

    Median household income: $70,628

    Regional price parity out of 100: 106.9

    Real income: $66,069

    Michigan

    Median household income: $51,084

    Regional price parity out of 100: 93.5

    Real income: $54,635

    Minnesota

    Median household income: $63,488

    Regional price parity out of 100: 97.4

    Real income: $65,183

    Mississippi

    Median household income: $40,593

    Regional price parity out of 100: 86.2

    Real income: $47,092

    Missouri

    Median household income: $50,238

    Regional price parity out of 100: 89.3

    Real income: $56,258

    Montana

    Median household income: $49,509

    Regional price parity out of 100: 94.8

    Real income: $52,225

    Nebraska

    Median household income: $54,996

    Regional price parity out of 100: 90.6

    Real income: $60,702


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 12:17:00 UTC

  • Knowing the deflation, operationalism, and grammars is a bit like having a super

    Knowing the deflation, operationalism, and grammars is a bit like having a superpower. And I just realized that if we teach everyone Testimonialism I won’t be the only person with the superpower…. sigh… πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-13 17:36:00 UTC