No The Universe is (exists as) not a ‘mind’ https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/23/no-the-universe-is-exists-as-not-a-mind/
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 15:26:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176155905064394755
No The Universe is (exists as) not a ‘mind’ https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/23/no-the-universe-is-exists-as-not-a-mind/
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 15:26:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176155905064394755
The False Dichotomy Of Capitalism vs Socialism is Another Abrahamic Deception https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/23/the-false-dichotomy-of-capitalism-vs-socialism-is-another-abrahamic-deception/
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 14:25:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176140527412142080
Rule of Law vs Government – Deconflation https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/23/rule-of-law-vs-government-deconflation/
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 12:53:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176117372773703681
And don’t waste my time with anonymous accounts. Either man up or shut up. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 00:51:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175935734764703744
Reply addressees: @User1233213
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175935519651504128
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@User1233213 That thing we call kin selection scales across disciplines, and only because we artificially isolate disciplines so that each discipline can maintain it’s grammar (system of paradigms and terms – meaning measurements). It’s this systemic problem I spend time solving with P.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175935519651504128
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@User1233213 That thing we call kin selection scales across disciplines, and only because we artificially isolate disciplines so that each discipline can maintain it’s grammar (system of paradigms and terms – meaning measurements). It’s this systemic problem I spend time solving with P.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175935519651504128
That thing we call kin selection scales across disciplines, and only because we artificially isolate disciplines so that each discipline can maintain it’s grammar (system of paradigms and terms – meaning measurements). It’s this systemic problem I spend time solving with P.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 00:50:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175935519651504128
Reply addressees: @User1233213
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175935215824322561
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@User1233213 This is a problem that arises from disciplinary specialization rather than mastery of multiple fields – and is another example of why I teach the Grammars, and use Economics (demonstrated behavior at scale) where others do not. Groups demonstrate different criteria for selection.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175935215824322561
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@User1233213 This is a problem that arises from disciplinary specialization rather than mastery of multiple fields – and is another example of why I teach the Grammars, and use Economics (demonstrated behavior at scale) where others do not. Groups demonstrate different criteria for selection.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175935215824322561
This is a problem that arises from disciplinary specialization rather than mastery of multiple fields – and is another example of why I teach the Grammars, and use Economics (demonstrated behavior at scale) where others do not. Groups demonstrate different criteria for selection.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 00:49:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175935215824322561
Reply addressees: @User1233213
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175934766559965185
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@User1233213 For example Jayman will disagree group selection but he limits the term to its origins, rather than expanding it to cover increasing means of selection based upon circumstantial demand – the most obvious being masculine traits in stress, and less so in plenty.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175934766559965185
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@User1233213 For example Jayman will disagree group selection but he limits the term to its origins, rather than expanding it to cover increasing means of selection based upon circumstantial demand – the most obvious being masculine traits in stress, and less so in plenty.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175934766559965185
For example Jayman will disagree group selection but he limits the term to its origins, rather than expanding it to cover increasing means of selection based upon circumstantial demand – the most obvious being masculine traits in stress, and less so in plenty.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 00:47:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175934766559965185
Reply addressees: @User1233213
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175934427270209537
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@User1233213 This is a test of verbalisms. Do we use one term for kin and extrapolate from there, or do we use a series beginning with kin selection, or do we take the terms from behavioral economics, and talk in the term of discounts. There are multiple term-category conflicts in this space.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175934427270209537
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@User1233213 This is a test of verbalisms. Do we use one term for kin and extrapolate from there, or do we use a series beginning with kin selection, or do we take the terms from behavioral economics, and talk in the term of discounts. There are multiple term-category conflicts in this space.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175934427270209537
This is a test of verbalisms. Do we use one term for kin and extrapolate from there, or do we use a series beginning with kin selection, or do we take the terms from behavioral economics, and talk in the term of discounts. There are multiple term-category conflicts in this space.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 00:46:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175934427270209537
Reply addressees: @User1233213
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175933781062115328
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@User1233213 Kin selection is demonstrated in every single stage of social order from the drowning test, friend selection, to neighborhood selection, to workplace, to voting patterns, to buying and art patterns. Clannishness varies as does trust by race and subrace. WTF are you talking about?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175933781062115328
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@User1233213 Kin selection is demonstrated in every single stage of social order from the drowning test, friend selection, to neighborhood selection, to workplace, to voting patterns, to buying and art patterns. Clannishness varies as does trust by race and subrace. WTF are you talking about?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175933781062115328
Kin selection is demonstrated in every single stage of social order from the drowning test, friend selection, to neighborhood selection, to workplace, to voting patterns, to buying and art patterns. Clannishness varies as does trust by race and subrace. WTF are you talking about?
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 00:43:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175933781062115328
Reply addressees: @User1233213
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175675476431519745
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175675476431519745

photos_and_videos/Heartbeats_vxqIsaiX_w/70544861_111749980223164_6799712925046013952_n_111749973556498.jpg

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-21 15:28:00 UTC