Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • RECIPROCITY ENTERING THE MAINSTREAM —“There’s that word reciprocity again… W

    RECIPROCITY ENTERING THE MAINSTREAM

    —“There’s that word reciprocity again… Where have I heard that before?!?”— JWarren Warren

    We will get there. We will standardize that term as the central object of conflict, thereby replacing equality. We probably wont get credit for it. But we will get there. Everyone will use the term. It is the foundation of western civilization. It’s the reason for our success. Its true and it’s moral. But the harder problem in the future will be preventing the use of abrahamic deceit to undermine that term. And every time they try we will have an opportunity to train the world about abrahamic deceit ,and its cause of past present conflcit dark age, and destruction.

    THE BIG HISTORY IN P

    This is the ‘big history’ (as someone said yesterday) provided by my research into Propertarianism. It’s that the war between the masculine eugenic indo-europea, the feminine dysgenic semitic, the masculine eugenic east asian, remains with India providing the most interesting compromise position at the expense of continuous failure to evolve.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:18:00 UTC

  • THE POLICE ARE DEPENDENT ON GASOLINE TOO In Houston I have gone 5 days without e

    THE POLICE ARE DEPENDENT ON GASOLINE TOO

    In Houston I have gone 5 days without electricity or EMS/Police service due to hurricanes.

    The first thing to go is gasoline. It was creepy to listen on my police scanner as they refused 911 calls because they didn’t have enough fuel to drive to the location.

    Now I fill several 5-gallon fuel cans when a hurricane approaches. Get a few of these and put them in your attic. Fill them when danger approaches…

    —Bill Shevick Jager

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:17:00 UTC

  • BELOW THE QUANTUM (worth repeating) … At present we deduce that a difference i

    BELOW THE QUANTUM

    (worth repeating)

    … At present we deduce that a difference in fundamental charges is producing a subsequent difference in fundamental charge distributions that we call quantum fields, and a distribution of temporary density of that quantum field we call a particle.

    And by repeating this process of a difference in the pattern of charges, particles form combinations we call atoms or elements, elements form chemicals ,chemicals form molecules, molecules that include carbon produce biochemical molecules, biochemical molecules form proteins, proteins produce molecules necessary for cells, cells produce other cells, cells produce organs, organs produce organisms, organisms produce nervous systems, nervous systems produce memories, memories produce predictions, predictions product choices, and there we go.

    The entirety of the ‘grammar’ of the universe is – similar to binary or ternary logic – a difference in charges, whose change we call entropy: the tendency of all charges to equilibrate from order caused by differences in charges, to the disorder – the minimum difference in charges possible. …

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:16:00 UTC

  • THE CONSTITUTION WILL BE FOR NORMIES I’m pretty sure the ‘constitution’ is the d

    THE CONSTITUTION WILL BE FOR NORMIES

    I’m pretty sure the ‘constitution’ is the deliverable you’re looking for. I think I should be able to get it to where it has the full case in it. And it’ll be a long paper, short ‘book’ or what was called a pamphlet in the past. Working on it and it’s getting ‘clear’.

    The List of “proofs’” of internal consistency of P-Law judgements will be for the politically interested. The book is for supergeeks. If I live long enough to work on religion that will be for everyone.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:14:00 UTC

  • Hmm.. our denial of natural classes and the western tradition of tripartism (now

    Hmm.. our denial of natural classes and the western tradition of tripartism (now quadripartism) and the differences in ability between those classes has been created by the marxist(class), feminist (gender) postmodernist (identity, race) project to undermine class cooperation that allows for at least some class rotation, rather than preventing it with castes.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:06:00 UTC

  • YOU DON’T GET IT DO YOU? (RESTORING RELIGION) If we can find a way to unite the

    YOU DON’T GET IT DO YOU? (RESTORING RELIGION)

    If we can find a way to unite the secular, rational, traditional, and feminine theological christian, and masculine mythological pagan under natural law, heroic virtues, and christian ethics, we can restore the church(es) to the central position in our civilization and restore the civil society, with common everything except grammar of expression.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:03:00 UTC

  • It took me longer to figure out what the germans had done to try to create secul

    It took me longer to figure out what the germans had done to try to create secular relligion than I think any other problem of religion. but the minute you have secular mindfulness, an ethnical and moral code adjudicated in law, then the ‘mythos’ is really just a matter of the means by which your mind ‘feels’ reality.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:03:00 UTC

  • NO, I’M NOT A TYPICAL AMERICAN No, you’re right, I”m not a typical american. I’m

    NO, I’M NOT A TYPICAL AMERICAN

    No, you’re right, I”m not a typical american. I’m pretty typical new englander, of english and french extraction, with the gift of my people, and the accompanying eccentricity, and probably the last generation of aristocratically raised and educated americans left.

    Something i’ll fix. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:01:00 UTC

  • YOU HAVE IT BACKWARDS – CHRISTIANS DO NOT PROFESS P-LAW A Christian does not pro

    YOU HAVE IT BACKWARDS – CHRISTIANS DO NOT PROFESS P-LAW

    A Christian does not profess P. A christian professes Christianity, and assists the implementation of a P-constitution, Because p is compatible with christianity, and will preserve Christianity in theological, philosophical, traditional, rational, and scientific terms. If christians want a theological monopoly they can wait until the islamists eradicate the rest of them – and carry the blame for letting it happen.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:59:00 UTC

  • NO, P-LAW IS NOT ‘SUPERIOR’ TO CHRISTIAN FAITH P-Law is not ‘superior’ to Christ

    NO, P-LAW IS NOT ‘SUPERIOR’ TO CHRISTIAN FAITH

    P-Law is not ‘superior’ to Christian Faith – we have no say over such things. P-Law is compatible with Christian ethics and morality, and superior in the material – science, economics, law, politics and war, and likewise christianity is compatible with P-law, and is outside of the material – science, economics, law, politics, and war.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:59:00 UTC