WOMEN EVOLVED to make use of the market for sovereignty, particularly sovereignty from males seeking to limit their choice of reproduction and limits to their consumption.
Conversely, men in… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496026580994237&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:57:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189572138233221120
OUR MOVEMENT WILL ACHIEVE CRITICAL MASS WHEN….
I can stand on a stage, with a half dozen P-Teachers, present an idea, and have the audience and the teachers handle the question.
We face… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496024624327766&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:55:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189571498287255553
THE REASON MEN WANT P-EDUCATION?
They know they’ve been lied to. They, they know they were taught falsehoods, and they want an education in the truth. The only reason I can teach is because there is a demand for truth.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:40:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189567651883950080
I walk every day. Especially to coffee. I drive too. And largely, unintentionally, I marvel at the folly of proletarians.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 14:04:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189543528864632832
Reply addressees: @digitalErmit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189510641784180736
IN REPLY TO:
@digitalErmit
@curtdoolittle did you have a walk today ?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189510641784180736
(from elsewhere)
yep. any country can be great if it first creates a good disciplined nationalist military that then produce a judiciary, that then produces a government, that then produces a market, that then funds commons. People think it’s the other way around. it isn’t. Its military on down. One step at a time.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:29:00 UTC
DON’T HATE, WE DON’T NEED TO
We don’t need to ‘hate’ anyone, we simply need the “rule of law of reciprocity”, and must insist on truthful and reciprocal speech to the public in public matters, as well as voluntary association and disassociation.
The left are the haters and can’t succeed without lying and sowing discord between genders, classes, and identities.
With the “Winning Right”, the rule of law of RECIPROCITY, insistence on truth, voluntary association and disassociation, the losing left would group together in localities where they can create their own local laws and norms suited to their wants and needs. What’s great about that? They couldn’t infect the rest of us with their ideological hell.
Thanks to: John Mark and Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:27:00 UTC
WHY DO ANGLO GOVERNMENTS LAST SO LONG?
It’s just much easier to reform a contract (constitution) that is adjudicated by an independent judiciary, than it is to reform a dictatorship, oligarchy, bureaucracy, or theocracy that lacks an independent judiciary and constitutional means of decision making given a division of powers, and fundamental rights especially to property.
Most of western history is the difficulty in maintaining our rule of law from attempts to usurp it by the aristocracy, the theocracy, the burghers, and now the underclass communists, devoted, and socialists.
A constitution if well written is an algorithm for the operation of a polity under falsification, tested before judges who are not involved in the operations of whatever function is in conflict.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:23:00 UTC
WITCH TRIALS. WHY?
AFAIK the increase in witch trials was an extension of the inquisition, then the reformation, as a means of creating examples by suppressing newly enabled social dissent under the decline of the influence of the church and the personalization of the religious experience by disintermediation from the priesthood. There isn’t really a consensus on it, but my rough understanding is that as wealth increased and local agency increased we saw the the protestant reformation put more control in the local hands at all levels – including religious. About 80% of prosecutions were of women, and most in central europe (germanic) countries. And women were uneducated and … uneducated women (as we see in daily videos) .. and as evidenced by asylum populations (mostly women), and current mental health statistics, were as disruptive in the past with psychosis as they are today – just like males -although we control males aggressively and we don’t control anti-social behavior in females. In other words I interpret it as a puritan reaction to the transfer of power of catholic inquisition to protestant hands, and the ‘fashion’ of exercising that power, until it was rather obvious that it was out of hand, and (a) judges would no longer accept testimony obtained under torture, (b) it was increasingly outlawed.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:21:00 UTC
THE MOST IMPORTANT LESSON FROM THE CHURCH EXPERIENCE
The most important lesson I’ve observed, and perhaps the most important, is that sitting still in church, and the social pressure of sitting still in church, no matter how hard it is, teaches us the meaning of ‘sacred’ which is ‘we have no rights of self fulfillment’.
I think it is underrated, how much the respect we demonstrate for one another in religious ceremony translates to how we ALWAYS act in the commons – and I think the loss of this ‘sacredness’ and this training in the ‘submission’ by develops ‘agency’ over impulses such that we do not impose so many costs of self expression (hyper-consumption) on the commons and therefore the polity.
You do know what group did this right? What one group undermined it? I do.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:19:00 UTC
WHY IS CURT GOING EASY ON RELIGION NOW?
The reason I’m more accommodating lately is because my work on investigating religion, education, and government is done, it’s just a matter of updating the constitution, switching our daily discourse to advocacy of that constitution and it’s solutions. I’m sorry having your sacred cows questioned so aggressively (prosecutorally) whether theological, philosophical, sophomoric, normative, or pseudoscientific was painful – but that’s what prosecutors do: falsify everything possible so that only the truth remains. Once the truth is understood, then we can search for compromises while motioning the truth between us. This is what we all need, and it’s a condition we all prefer, but we are always trying to ‘get a better deal by hook or by crook’ and sorry – everything is a reciprocal exchange.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:18:00 UTC