I’d personalize everything, think my emotions and impulses were meaningful information, never accept blame or responsibility, hold grudges eternally, gossip, judge everyone especially women by trivialities, be incapable of basic economics and politics.
#IfIWereTheOppositeSex
(sarcasm)
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 11:18:00 UTC
I am not sure if the argument that the east indo-europeans (supernatural-theological) were the losers in the conflict with the west indo-european (technological-magical), but it sure makes a lot of sense. Those in control (magic) those under control (supernatural). I think it’s more likely that the Anatolians or proto iranics brought nigh-religion to the competition north of the caucuses.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 09:09:00 UTC
Difference between economics and finance. We are being abused by finance. We fight other countries with economics
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 01:25:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197325218978643970
Reply addressees: @natrolleon @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197318289581469696
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197318289581469696
Hey so, you know, the argument is that women don’t love their men. That men are disposable. Men are promiscuous by nature out of reproductive necessity but women are not disposable except at the margin (sports, rock stars, etc) where the supply is infinite.
The reality is that we love each other within the limits of reciprocity and proportionality, and we stay together even with only habituation within our marketability.
So you know, we don’t have enough value to one another in the current order which is showing up in birth rates. And that order is only possible because of a rapidly declining asymmetry of ecnomic possibility.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-20 20:02:00 UTC
I think they forgot LA is a reclaimed desert that can be restored to natural conditions rather easily.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-20 15:54:00 UTC
JUDGMENT: THE PURPOSE OF THE POSTMODERN REVOLUTION
The purpose of the postmodern revolution was to relieve the infantilized mind of the pressures of competition in modernity when freed of the excuse that they were just poor. Unfortunately, the poor were poor deservedly, and the postmodern underclasses are still underclasses that can just spend money because their betters have made all consumer goods and services infinitely cheaper.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-20 15:12:00 UTC
EAST ASIAN IQ ADVANTAGE DISSIPATES RAPIDLY
Recent data is in line with my opinion: they mature less and are less dimorphic, and as such *their intelligence advantage does not continue to… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=511067579490137&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-20 14:54:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197166262863958016
PERCEPTIONS OF THE RIGHT
(still thinking)
I think the difference in my perception might be the number of military guys that I interact with, and the fact that my work isn’t accessible to the ‘dipshit classes’ of the disaffected.
Strange shift happening in that just over the past month more military and political rather than ‘activists’ are contacting me – and it’s by phone.
So I’m going to test it but I”ll reiterate that if you go to market with moral or spiritual messages you will attract those demanding moral and spiritual messages, and that will of necessity be people who have little agency. In other words, the people that are online, the christian right in particular, is shit talking nonsense. You need men. And men want MATERIAL not EMPATHIC returns.
What gets us attention online is a counter-signal to what gets a revolution started.
I went with an emphasis on incentives, not emotions. Harder to access. But then, like the wall street journal over a supermarket rag, you get the people with agency, not those who lack it.
So, I’m interpreting the world a little differently I think.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-20 10:10:00 UTC
EAST ASIAN IQ ADVANTAGE DISSIPATES RAPIDLY
Recent data is in line with my opinion: they mature less and are less dimorphic, and as such *their intelligence advantage does not continue to scale like ours with age*. In other words, they have a youth advantage. But it does not persist. Meanwhile, we keep getting ‘smarter’ by about a point every three years. I suspect this is due to differences in the advantage of verbal ability, and also explains why the Ashkenazim retain that advantage throughout life. Again, mathematics and spatial reasoning are a form of calculation, but so is language.
And keeping them in relation (europeans) is something that the Ashkenazim do not do (like all Semites verbalism seems to be endemically ideal), and the east Asians have a huge population to draw from and their need for order helps their bureaucracies evolve into talent pools.
So again neoteny, rate of maturity, gender differences in brain development are the primary differentiators in human groups (species).
our only problem is rates of reproduction of our classes reversing our many centuries of eugenics.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-20 09:54:00 UTC
INCENTIVES FOR DURABILITY OF MARRIAGE
—“Why is marriage still viable for the top in this hyperconsumptive society but not for the bottom?
Is it because the top have a predisposition to provide higher investment parenting than the bottom?”–Richard Hall
Because in the upper third, there is so much economic advantage, so much status advantage, and so many more means of ameliorating differences, that the relationship can survive as a partnership.
Conversely, hyperconsumption is a means of sedating the inferior status response, that drove demand for religion. Women are more sensitive to status, and have a relentless nesting urge, which is why they are more susceptible to it.
Men, on the other hand, compete for status by DOING and are only concerned with obtaining a position in the hierarchy that they can afford to maintain and not lose.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-20 09:47:00 UTC