Apr 1, 2020, 9:09 AM The use of morality outgroup is only one of utility. The only moral imperative ingroup is reciprocity The only moral choice ingroup is christian tolerance and charity within the limits of that tolerance. Nothing else need be said.
Form: Short Note
-
Morality: There Is Nothing Complex to Understand.
Apr 1, 2020, 9:09 AM The use of morality outgroup is only one of utility. The only moral imperative ingroup is reciprocity The only moral choice ingroup is christian tolerance and charity within the limits of that tolerance. Nothing else need be said.
-
The Difficult Idea to Get Across
The Difficult Idea to Get Across https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/the-difficult-idea-to-get-across/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 12:43:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265986956338528256
-
The Difficult Idea to Get Across
Apr 1, 2020, 12:27 PM (important) When I say “the big problem is switching people from idealism (homogenous bias) under which each person seeks whatever bias fits his, to realism (heterogeneous bias) that is aware of the market competition. In other words, monopoly is endemic in western moral thinking bcause we’ve been homogenous since our beginnings. So we have no means of defense against the LIE of the value of diversity. This is yet another example of the f—king stupidity of libertarian tropes (sophistry). If you build high trust high value commons, then diversity increases transaction costs that all ancestors worked to reduce. So the reason we seek SOME diversity is to increase novelty because we seek to hyper-consume cheap novelty (consumption that destroys commons) rather than expensive novelty (innovation, continued capitalization of commons). I don’t know how to explain this more simply. I would appreciate anyone who could. Leftists spend down inheritance to feed herd instinct for numbers.
-
In no case are ‘moral intuition’ or ‘value’, neutral.
Apr 1, 2020, 2:14 PM The market will always converge on the moral utility that is necessary for the demographic distribution within the market. As such if you want a high trust prosperous polity, you will converge on reciprocity if and only if the population is capable of reciprocity under the given geographic, demographic, military, political, economic, and familial structure. So, no, in no case are ‘moral intuition’ or ‘value’ neutral. A sufficient market demand for evil, criminality, or immorality is a market demand that is non-arbitrary. A market demand for hedonism, libertinism, hyperconsumption must be offset by others market demand for the opposite. Ergo, your preferences may be preferences, but that does not mean they are value neutral. They aren’t. They are consequent non-neutral.
-
In no case are ‘moral intuition’ or ‘value’, neutral.
Apr 1, 2020, 2:14 PM The market will always converge on the moral utility that is necessary for the demographic distribution within the market. As such if you want a high trust prosperous polity, you will converge on reciprocity if and only if the population is capable of reciprocity under the given geographic, demographic, military, political, economic, and familial structure. So, no, in no case are ‘moral intuition’ or ‘value’ neutral. A sufficient market demand for evil, criminality, or immorality is a market demand that is non-arbitrary. A market demand for hedonism, libertinism, hyperconsumption must be offset by others market demand for the opposite. Ergo, your preferences may be preferences, but that does not mean they are value neutral. They aren’t. They are consequent non-neutral.
-
Either You’re Conducting War Games Or You’re Not A Necessary Bureaucracy
Apr 1, 2020, 2:34 PM I make the same argument. the CDC, Homeland Security, and Disaster Relief Organization, and The Treasury are either creating war plans and holding war games or they are wasting our time and money. Bureaucracies run by constant process rather than project deliverables, war plans, and shocks
—“In 2015, I urged world leaders in a TED talk to prepare for a pandemic the same way they prepare for war — by running simulations to find the cracks in the system,” Gates wrote. “As we’ve seen this year, we have a long way to go. But I still believe that if we make the right decisions now, informed by science, data and the experience of medical professionals, we can save lives and get the country back to work.”–
-
Either You’re Conducting War Games Or You’re Not A Necessary Bureaucracy
Apr 1, 2020, 2:34 PM I make the same argument. the CDC, Homeland Security, and Disaster Relief Organization, and The Treasury are either creating war plans and holding war games or they are wasting our time and money. Bureaucracies run by constant process rather than project deliverables, war plans, and shocks
—“In 2015, I urged world leaders in a TED talk to prepare for a pandemic the same way they prepare for war — by running simulations to find the cracks in the system,” Gates wrote. “As we’ve seen this year, we have a long way to go. But I still believe that if we make the right decisions now, informed by science, data and the experience of medical professionals, we can save lives and get the country back to work.”–
-
Your Preferences Are Non-Neutral
Apr 1, 2020, 3:55 PM The market will always converge on the moral utility that is necessary for the demographic distribution within the market. As such if you want a high trust prosperous polity, you will converge on reciprocity if and only if the population is capable of reciprocity under the given geographic, demographic, military, political, economic, and familial structure. So, no, in no case is either ‘moral intuition’ or ‘value’ neutral. A sufficient market demand for evil, criminality, or immorality is a market demand that is non-arbitrary. A market demand for hedonism, libertinism, hyper-consumption must be offset by others market demand for the opposite. Ergo, your preferences may be preferences, but that does not mean they are value neutral. They aren’t. They are consequent non-neutral.
-
Your Preferences Are Non-Neutral
Apr 1, 2020, 3:55 PM The market will always converge on the moral utility that is necessary for the demographic distribution within the market. As such if you want a high trust prosperous polity, you will converge on reciprocity if and only if the population is capable of reciprocity under the given geographic, demographic, military, political, economic, and familial structure. So, no, in no case is either ‘moral intuition’ or ‘value’ neutral. A sufficient market demand for evil, criminality, or immorality is a market demand that is non-arbitrary. A market demand for hedonism, libertinism, hyper-consumption must be offset by others market demand for the opposite. Ergo, your preferences may be preferences, but that does not mean they are value neutral. They aren’t. They are consequent non-neutral.