Form: Reply

–“If you really think you get to keep the fruits of Western Civilization stripped of its religious ethos, you will be greatly disappointed.”–

Only if we don’t replace it’s supernatural justification with the same ethics in natural prose – which is what Aristotle said, and both Aquinas and the Scholastics (the church in general) as well as Blackstone and the Founders, as well as people like myself and our organization understood.

So just as supernatural justification of ethics need be taught by an institution, natural law ethics must be taught by an institution – because that scale and uniformity of production requires an institution.

It is slightly more costly to train people in natural law, but unlike superstition it doesn’t require faith, doesn’t require lying, and isn’t dismissable or open to ridicule like superstition faith and the lying they require.

So what occurred in it’s place was the pseudoscientific religion of the feminine-jewish-abrahamic-marxist sequence of frauds.

Meaning we could quite easily purge the feminine-to-marxist sequence of lies, and teach the ethics of truth AS a religion as did the greeks and chinese did with their traditions.

In doing so one does achieve the spiritual – just not the imaginary spiritual, but the real spiritual.

Though there lies the rub. The reason for false religion is to allow people who are dissimilar, have dissimilar interests, dissimilar wants, don’t like one another don’t respect one another to act optimistically.

In other words, the reason you need a proxy is because you in fact hate your neighbor.

Reply addressees: @ArmoryOC