I love you man. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-23 18:17:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782836265143980487
Reply addressees: @radiofreenw
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782826686221853050
Form: Reply
-
I understand but that’s not the question, and relativity is a description not an
I understand but that’s not the question, and relativity is a description not an explanation. I’m curious about the explanation.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-23 18:15:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782835650456142122
Reply addressees: @jwilson1717 @Rasterdingus
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782834897050058976
-
I’m not quite sure which thing you’re saying, but if you mean that given the bas
I’m not quite sure which thing you’re saying, but if you mean that given the base rate (assuming there is one), then accounting for gravity and velocity should (and does) end up with rate unequal everywhere, but if you compensate for gravity and velocity, then yes you should find the base rate everywhere. (Though it’s almost impossible to totally sum gravity and velocity outside of one’s reference frame.)
WHich like most relativity makes one’s head hurt. 😉Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-23 18:08:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782833962039005184
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782832984074187179
-
RT @AutistocratMS: @queen_calder @curtdoolittle @controscience @haymanwazzup The
RT @AutistocratMS: @queen_calder @curtdoolittle @controscience @haymanwazzup The only true take is that we’re the least racist people out t…
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-23 17:54:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782830399887900685
-
Explain the argument and then I’ll use the explanation to explain it. 😉
Explain the argument and then I’ll use the explanation to explain it. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-23 17:35:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782825720022003778
Reply addressees: @partymember55
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782821398982901886
-
I am attempting to explain to you using the common objections (which are on wiki
I am attempting to explain to you using the common objections (which are on wiki, and other places) why EU cannot provide evidence other than narrative just as Einstien’s general relativity cannot explain the apparently influence of the quantum background as other than a narrative of ‘space time’. So as I understand it, (and I have done a study of pseudoscientific theories in physics) and specifically because i’m an epistemologist that works on first principles (foundations), and have done deep work on the scientific method and the problems of systematizing, dominance bias, and the emergence of error, bias, and deceit – including the fictionalisms that result, I am keenly aware of why you are demonstrating the behavior you are, why the EU is an overreach, and what foundations it’s lacking in order to justify your and other’s fascination with it.
This is not because it is entirely false. It’s because it is still lacking sufficient foundation to make a truth claim rather than an explanatory power claim.
And as far as I know there is no one living or dead that understands testifiability as well as I do.Reply addressees: @controscience
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-23 17:33:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782825220522295296
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782817319032614961
-
Think of it this way, after three possible spatial dimensions, time is the next
Think of it this way, after three possible spatial dimensions, time is the next potential for the release of pressure in time. This is why, I am pretty sure, that there is both a zero point of time as well as one of energy.
The question is, then, given that time passes slowly both in gravity (veolocity) and at velocity regardless of gravity, that the zero point of time might be quite fast.
I am not quite sure what this would mean other than the exchange of velocity(change) into persistence (time) appears to result.
What does that mean for the universe? It percieves itself so to speak as acting very quickly, while complexity within gravity perceives it as very slow?Reply addressees: @Rasterdingus
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-23 17:06:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782818381940269056
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782813161545936935
-
Nothing you’re saying here is contradictory to anything I’ve said or would say.
Nothing you’re saying here is contradictory to anything I’ve said or would say. Sorry.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-23 17:00:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782816812607889642
Reply addressees: @controscience
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782804968342487502
-
I doubt it’s a ‘coup’ but the fact that there was some deep state something or o
I doubt it’s a ‘coup’ but the fact that there was some deep state something or other with or without foreign entanglement is certainly possible if not likely.
Trump would not redact something that was harmful to the deep state unless it would be harmful to the american people as a whole. And the fact that he’s said to napolitano that it’s not something he would ever divulge is scary enough to respect trump’s decision.Reply addressees: @DrewandCharlie1
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-23 16:59:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782816618411622400
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782810627507159179
-
Correct
Correct.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-23 16:56:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782815929899921752
Reply addressees: @Rasterdingus
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782813161545936935