Form: Reply

The charts are correct. His attempt, I assume, is to countersignal the victorian pedestaling of women and to suggest we return to the long European tradition of women as the source of social and political disharmony outside of the home. Effectively nietzschean. At present while men have abandoned responsibility for defense of the commons from the instincts of women, it is still this failure to contain the instincts of women that has driven all the leftward progress since their enfranchisement.
So, I probably can’t interpret what he’s saying here except through that lens. And I assume you’re seeing or ‘feeling’ something neither he nor I nor our other members would see or feel.
I suspect its possible, that because he is attempting to reach a certain demographic, he’s inserting emotional and moral load into the argument when the rest of the organization would not – we would simply state the science.

Reply addressees: @radiofreenw