Form: Reply

—“People like Curt are the problem and not part of the solution.”— A Critic All: I don’t really have any technical critics. I kind of doubt I will ever see those any more than Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hume, Darwin, Menger, and Hayek saw technical critics. I have that I know of only non-technical critics. Most fall into the following camps: a) (Possible) They question whether, if my proposals were enacted that people would, compete the nationalist program and return to many, small, european nation states. b) (Practical) They prefer a faster, more ‘collectivist’ strategy in which they feel they have social (verbal) influence – or they feel that it is impractical to raise a revolution and enact constitutional changes. c) (Political) They are trying to rally through some sort of framing and my solution prevents emotional rallying by falsifying their framing and replaces it with one that is d) (Philosophical) They feel out of control and are seeking a means of control through some sort of framing that I have falsified. e) (Psychological) They feel out of control and are seeking a means of control and they cannot understand the algorithmic (operational) method that I’ve produced, and this makes them feel out of control again. FWIW: I can obviously understand and empathize with each of these criticisms. However, my intellectual contribution to mankind will survive and probably have influence regardless of those criticisms. So I have a list of objectives and the top of that list is producing that work. I know I can complete that work. I know a revolutionary change is possible because I know how easily that the American government can be collapsed. Whether I am able to produce a revolution and cause that collapse and institute such a constitutions *as I plan* is certainly a question. If I was ten years younger I wouldn’t really have any doubts. But my energy levels have decreased rapidly over the past decade and a half – possible just due to my illnesses, and possibly due to age. But that does not mean others who are younger, or more suited, or have more energy, will not succeed if I don’t. That it is possible to do a thing, and the labor and organization to do a thing are something different.

—“People like Curt are the problem and not part of the solution.”— A Critic All: I don’t really have any technical critics. I kind of doubt I will ever see those any more than Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hume, Darwin, Menger, and Hayek saw technical critics. I have that I know of only non-technical critics. Most fall into the following camps: a) (Possible) They question whether, if my proposals were enacted that people would, compete the nationalist program and return to many, small, european nation states. b) (Practical) They prefer a faster, more ‘collectivist’ strategy in which they feel they have social (verbal) influence – or they feel that it is impractical to raise a revolution and enact constitutional changes. c) (Political) They are trying to rally through some sort of framing and my solution prevents emotional rallying by falsifying their framing and replaces it with one that is d) (Philosophical) They feel out of control and are seeking a means of control through some sort of framing that I have falsified. e) (Psychological) They feel out of control and are seeking a means of control and they cannot understand the algorithmic (operational) method that I’ve produced, and this makes them feel out of control again. FWIW: I can obviously understand and empathize with each of these criticisms. However, my intellectual contribution to mankind will survive and probably have influence regardless of those criticisms. So I have a list of objectives and the top of that list is producing that work. I know I can complete that work. I know a revolutionary change is possible because I know how easily that the American government can be collapsed. Whether I am able to produce a revolution and cause that collapse and institute such a constitutions *as I plan* is certainly a question. If I was ten years younger I wouldn’t really have any doubts. But my energy levels have decreased rapidly over the past decade and a half – possible just due to my illnesses, and possibly due to age. But that does not mean others who are younger, or more suited, or have more energy, will not succeed if I don’t. That it is possible to do a thing, and the labor and organization to do a thing are something different.

Thank you, Curt ¡¡

Thank you, Curt ¡¡

(from elsewhere) (response to a non-argumentative criticism) I’m your huckleberry pimple-dick. 😉 Seriously. It’s not like the room temperature IQ crowd you hang with is my target audience. And it’s not like I have any interest in dumbing down my work for the pubescent window-licker franchise. So either you can follow adult discourse in the philosophy of science or you can’t. Since others can and do, then the market for comprehension has decided, and you’re simply an intellectually infertile zeta. Pick any topic in the debate and fight or continue to throw your argumentative maxi pads as evidence of you angry vagina effeminacy. pussy is as pussy does. 😉 i do however love a bit of recreational trash talking about the peasantry.

(from elsewhere) (response to a non-argumentative criticism) I’m your huckleberry pimple-dick. 😉 Seriously. It’s not like the room temperature IQ crowd you hang with is my target audience. And it’s not like I have any interest in dumbing down my work for the pubescent window-licker franchise. So either you can follow adult discourse in the philosophy of science or you can’t. Since others can and do, then the market for comprehension has decided, and you’re simply an intellectually infertile zeta. Pick any topic in the debate and fight or continue to throw your argumentative maxi pads as evidence of you angry vagina effeminacy. pussy is as pussy does. 😉 i do however love a bit of recreational trash talking about the peasantry.