—“RE: BUT A PLANNER CANNOT KNOW WHICH RAILROAD IS ECONOMICALLY EFFICIENT TO BUILD”—
(Responding only because some well intentioned fool ‘liked’ your reply)
That’s false. Because all differences in economic productivity are reducible to time. Calculation is possible. The problem is competition that determines price, not the method by which price is calculated.
You know, I have been working on this problem only since about 2001, and I know that Russo-Ukrainian Libertarianism was abandoned by intellectuals relatively quickly, but it’s still surprising that these nonsense arguments still persist. Mises was irrelevant. Rothbard was wrong.
Hoppe took rothbard and restated it in the justificationary nonsense of Kant and the Marxists.But we’ve left behind justificationism along with it’s source – scripture. Science is exclusively falsifications: Darwinian.The real insights of Mises, Rothbard,and Hoppe are obscured..
…by pseudoscientific propaganda. We solve social science in a century when no one else did: Mises discovered operationalism in economics, rothbard and hoppe reduced all social science to reciprocity (property), and it is possible to construct a formal logic of LAW.
Yet those who had a direct connection to rothbard or rand are still grasping at straws of rationalist falsehood. Science is complete. Philosophy is relegated to preference and good. And justification went the way of scripture. Just how it is. They only got it half right.
Form: Reply
-
“RE: BUT A PLANNER CANNOT KNOW WHICH RAILROAD IS ECONOMICALLY EFFICIENT TO BUILD
—“RE: BUT A PLANNER CANNOT KNOW WHICH RAILROAD IS ECONOMICALLY EFFICIENT TO BUILD”—
(Responding only because some well intentioned fool ‘liked’ your reply)
That’s false. Because all differences in economic productivity are reducible to time. Calculation is possible. The problem is competition that determines price, not the method by which price is calculated.
You know, I have been working on this problem only since about 2001, and I know that Russo-Ukrainian Libertarianism was abandoned by intellectuals relatively quickly, but it’s still surprising that these nonsense arguments still persist. Mises was irrelevant. Rothbard was wrong.
Hoppe took rothbard and restated it in the justificationary nonsense of Kant and the Marxists.But we’ve left behind justificationism along with it’s source – scripture. Science is exclusively falsifications: Darwinian.The real insights of Mises, Rothbard,and Hoppe are obscured..
…by pseudoscientific propaganda. We solve social science in a century when no one else did: Mises discovered operationalism in economics, rothbard and hoppe reduced all social science to reciprocity (property), and it is possible to construct a formal logic of LAW.
Yet those who had a direct connection to rothbard or rand are still grasping at straws of rationalist falsehood. Science is complete. Philosophy is relegated to preference and good. And justification went the way of scripture. Just how it is. They only got it half right.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 10:41:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Russians (and Putin) were restoring their influence and
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Russians (and Putin) were restoring their influence and status in the world. Prior to 2013, Putin was the most respected politician in the world, an idol of the american right, and on the cover of magazines as a hero. The problem was, that when the Ukrainian Maidan Revol… -
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Russians (and Putin) were restoring their influence and
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Russians (and Putin) were restoring their influence and status in the world. Prior to 2013, Putin was the most respected politician in the world, an idol of the american right, and on the cover of magazines as a hero. The problem was, that when the Ukrainian Maidan Revol… -
That is only because you are naive. And do not know my work
That is only because you are naive. And do not know my work.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 08:53:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974931801692147712
Reply addressees: @frank2018p3m
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974840052890075136
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974840052890075136
-
The defining work was done by Hicks
The defining work was done by Hicks. https://t.co/2GjaPeuki1
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 06:40:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974898168214237184
Reply addressees: @JoshColeEd @npdrifter @TorontoStar
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974862251868868608
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974862251868868608
-
You mean a thousand switzerland’s? When a country is small the bureaucracy is sm
You mean a thousand switzerland’s? When a country is small the bureaucracy is small, and there are many people not far from the top, and few idle people at the top to live parasitically off the producers. Small homogenous states redistribute. Empires war and decline.USA = empire.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 01:09:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974814911707656192
Reply addressees: @Jory_Nal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974776267319934977
IN REPLY TO:
@Jory_Nal
@curtdoolittle So a million tiny countries, no one capable of handling crises on their own, ultimately falling to corporate slavery.
#Fascism had another name, #corporatism (#Mussolini).Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974776267319934977
-
But I have as soft spot for chomsky no matter how pathetic his personal opinions
But I have as soft spot for chomsky no matter how pathetic his personal opinions, simply because his work on using turing’s inventions in computer science to advance the study of grammar and language.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 01:07:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974814401625812992
Reply addressees: @wjfrisby
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974776990774579200
IN REPLY TO:
@wjfrisby
@curtdoolittle That description of Zizek could apply equally to Chomsky.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974776990774579200
-
It does apply to chomsky. The left, like the strategy females use to weaken alph
It does apply to chomsky. The left, like the strategy females use to weaken alphas, consists of gossip and undermining, rather than testable propositions for actions. This is because if their intentions were stated they would be revolting.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 01:06:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974814156011593730
Reply addressees: @wjfrisby
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974776990774579200
IN REPLY TO:
@wjfrisby
@curtdoolittle That description of Zizek could apply equally to Chomsky.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974776990774579200
-
When Marxism failed due to the success of consumer capitalism, the frankfurt sch
When Marxism failed due to the success of consumer capitalism, the frankfurt school changed the discourse, and when socialism failed the french returned with postmodernism and denial of reality, truth, and argument, in search for power by identity politics. All Just Power.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 01:05:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974813878700912640
Reply addressees: @npdrifter @TorontoStar
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974777100178620417
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974777100178620417