Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 20:45:00 UTC
Form: Reply
-
Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline
Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 20:44:00 UTC
-
Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline
Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 20:44:00 UTC
-
Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline
Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 20:43:00 UTC
-
Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline
Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 20:43:00 UTC
-
It’s rather technical, (natural law of reciprocity) and it’s the logic behind th
It’s rather technical, (natural law of reciprocity) and it’s the logic behind the constitution and our ancient tradition of germanic common law. -Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 20:33:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975107899176386565
Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975046491810160640
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975046491810160640
-
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he t
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he thinks he is evil, but because his actions are warranted – either via punishment, retribution, restitution, profit, or some version of ‘getting his or her fair share’ (which is the justification we make for most of ou… -
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he t
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he thinks he is evil, but because his actions are warranted – either via punishment, retribution, restitution, profit, or some version of ‘getting his or her fair share’ (which is the justification we make for most of ou… -
I’m not sure that’s right Dr Peterson, in the sense that women are not bound by
I’m not sure that’s right Dr Peterson, in the sense that women are not bound by the reciprocal threat between males as they were prior to 1900. Duel, Libel, Slander, and Scold were effective for both genders.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 17:58:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975068761236664320
Reply addressees: @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975059531473477632
IN REPLY TO:
@jordanbpeterson
High trait agreeableness neuroticism, I would guess. But of course such differences don’t really exist. https://t.co/jhsXYF5kt6
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975059531473477632
-
No. The united states proved that as the sole remaining postwar economy, it coul
No. The united states proved that as the sole remaining postwar economy, it could pay for the international system of finance and trade by imposing it by force on the world, after inheriting the british empire’s role of doing so.We no longer can afford to. Everyone has caught up.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 15:50:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975036682079756288
Reply addressees: @Jory_Nal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975035636569772034
IN REPLY TO:
@Jory_Nal
@curtdoolittle Historically empires arose as a means to regulate trade by sea or long vulnerable land routes.
UK in 20th century proved that many small countries could still follow common law, protect sea trade, respond in coordinated way to disaster, without one big Navy. But…the Falklands.Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975035636569772034