I’m a typical New England WASP from a founding puritan family, and what it ‘means’ is that you tend to look at the majority of the population as the peasantry running with scissors, while the Priesthood of pseudoscience in the Academy, Media, and State, eggs them onward. (Really) And had it not been for massive immigration designed to undermine our civilization, we would have won the argument with the leftists (marxist, postmodernists) just as we won every other argument with them.
Form: Reply
-
What does it mean to be a WASP in 2018?
I’m a typical New England WASP from a founding puritan family, and what it ‘means’ is that you tend to look at the majority of the population as the peasantry running with scissors, while the Priesthood of pseudoscience in the Academy, Media, and State, eggs them onward. (Really) And had it not been for massive immigration designed to undermine our civilization, we would have won the argument with the leftists (marxist, postmodernists) just as we won every other argument with them.
-
Yep. That *IS* the problem. lol
Yep. That *IS* the problem. lol
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-23 17:03:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032674696456810497
Reply addressees: @xmjEE
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032669199259369472
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032669199259369472
-
(a) hire a competent CEO or COO (b) convert the entire organization into one man
(a) hire a competent CEO or COO (b) convert the entire organization into one managed by projects (quarterly, and yearly goals), (c) rate the customer satisfaction of those that provide services (d) Reorganize the company to take on the new projects every half year or year.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-23 16:40:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032668937228570624
Reply addressees: @xmjEE
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032667505398083585
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032667505398083585
-
Why Include Rothbard and Mises with Marx and Marxists?
—“Q: I’m unsure of why Curt Doolittle grouped Rothbard and Mises with Marx, unless they were actually faux anti-Marxists?”– Matthew Genack Answer by Eli Harman They weren’t faux anti-marxists. They were sincere anti-Marxists. But what they offered in its place was justificationary pseudoscience, same as Marxism, differing in the details and conclusions, but not fundamentally in the methods.
-
Why Include Rothbard and Mises with Marx and Marxists?
—“Q: I’m unsure of why Curt Doolittle grouped Rothbard and Mises with Marx, unless they were actually faux anti-Marxists?”– Matthew Genack Answer by Eli Harman They weren’t faux anti-marxists. They were sincere anti-Marxists. But what they offered in its place was justificationary pseudoscience, same as Marxism, differing in the details and conclusions, but not fundamentally in the methods.
-
Not Radical Individualism, but Individual Sovereignty and Intolerant Familialism
—“And I’ll be the first to concede that radical individualism is indeed problematic when you’re faced with collectivists who want you gone, but I do think that individualism is ideal after the threat has been adequately dealt with, and is in keeping with the general ethos of the West.”–Matthew Genack Radical individualism is just an attack on the very commons that made western civilization competitive. Individual Sovereignty, and Radical Familialism is a better strategy.
-
Not Radical Individualism, but Individual Sovereignty and Intolerant Familialism
—“And I’ll be the first to concede that radical individualism is indeed problematic when you’re faced with collectivists who want you gone, but I do think that individualism is ideal after the threat has been adequately dealt with, and is in keeping with the general ethos of the West.”–Matthew Genack Radical individualism is just an attack on the very commons that made western civilization competitive. Individual Sovereignty, and Radical Familialism is a better strategy.
-
NOT RADICAL INDIVIDUALISM, BUT INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY AND INTOLERANT FAMILIALISM
NOT RADICAL INDIVIDUALISM, BUT INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY AND INTOLERANT FAMILIALISM
—“And I’ll be the first to concede that radical individualism is indeed problematic when you’re faced with… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=283540518909512&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-21 20:19:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1031999191357243393
-
“I have a friend. He wants to learn to code, and I figured you’d be the best per
—“I have a friend. He wants to learn to code, and I figured you’d be the best person to ask about how approach the move. Is there a language he should learn as opposed to another? Should… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=283523775577853&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-21 19:52:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1031992378226352134