Form: Reply

  • (….brought into consistency with the gated institutional narrative, assisting

    (….brought into consistency with the gated institutional narrative, assisting the left in winning elections. )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 01:31:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033527287717801984

    Reply addressees: @Outsideness

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033166534783324160


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Outsideness

    … Crudely obvious but true:
    The primary function of journalism is to repackage facts until they’ve been brought into consistency with the Left winning elections. …

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033166534783324160

  • ??? I’m Not ‘involved’ with Anyone.

    —“I don’t understand why you’re all involved with Semeticist wacko Claire Khaw?”— Well, let’s ask who am I involved with? Frankly NO ONE other than close friends and followers. I really don’t follow populists or fringe people at all. I have no idea what any of the alt right thinks or talks about unless one of you tells me. I follow scientists and particularly economists, and I rely on two people in particular to filter the vast stream of papers produced, down to what I care about. I don’t go out looking for interviews. I just take what comes at me. It’s my job to do interviews. I’d do an interview with Salon magazine in they asked me. It doesn’t mean I agree with them. I consider myself a conservative libertarian, very close to a Tory in skepticism and sentiment, with a Whig view of history. I consider my work New Right. I agree with the alt right that action must be taken to preserve our people, culture, and civilization for the benefit of our descendants and because of our unique civilization the future of mankind. But my view is nationalism for everyone because globalism is just Abrahamic despotism all over again. (FWIW I blocked Khaw because cognitive authoritarianism is neither possible nor desirable without even worse effects that we see from abrahamism – it’s just a mental illness to believe so.)

  • ??? I’m Not ‘involved’ with Anyone.

    —“I don’t understand why you’re all involved with Semeticist wacko Claire Khaw?”— Well, let’s ask who am I involved with? Frankly NO ONE other than close friends and followers. I really don’t follow populists or fringe people at all. I have no idea what any of the alt right thinks or talks about unless one of you tells me. I follow scientists and particularly economists, and I rely on two people in particular to filter the vast stream of papers produced, down to what I care about. I don’t go out looking for interviews. I just take what comes at me. It’s my job to do interviews. I’d do an interview with Salon magazine in they asked me. It doesn’t mean I agree with them. I consider myself a conservative libertarian, very close to a Tory in skepticism and sentiment, with a Whig view of history. I consider my work New Right. I agree with the alt right that action must be taken to preserve our people, culture, and civilization for the benefit of our descendants and because of our unique civilization the future of mankind. But my view is nationalism for everyone because globalism is just Abrahamic despotism all over again. (FWIW I blocked Khaw because cognitive authoritarianism is neither possible nor desirable without even worse effects that we see from abrahamism – it’s just a mental illness to believe so.)

  • canada

    canada.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-25 22:09:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033476534890315779

    Reply addressees: @Jccd20 @CandaceToddLV @MomsDemand

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033476101266391040


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Jccd20

    @CandaceToddLV @MomsDemand This is why we are truely looking into moving out of the country. Last year was our first year in school and we had 3 shooting threats, one involved homeland security, in KINDERGARTEN!

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033476101266391040

  • “Hate to get off the topic but what exactly is an economically conservative soci

    —“Hate to get off the topic but what exactly is an economically conservative social liberal Constitutionalist Republican?”— someone else, about a friend.

    Eric Danelaw (I view it as a… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=286892461907651&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-25 19:08:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033430827122786306

  • “I don’t understand why you’re all involved with Semeticist wacko Claire Khaw?”-

    —“I don’t understand why you’re all involved with Semeticist wacko Claire Khaw?”—

    Well, let’s ask who am I involved with? Frankly NO ONE other than close friends and followers. I really… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=286805491916348&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-25 14:04:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033354532468744192

  • I’M NOT ‘INVOLVED’ WITH ANYONE. —“I don’t understand why you’re all involved w

    I’M NOT ‘INVOLVED’ WITH ANYONE.

    —“I don’t understand why you’re all involved with Semeticist wacko Claire Khaw?”—

    Well, let’s ask who am I involved with? Frankly NO ONE other than close friends and followers. I really don’t follow populists or fringe people at all. I have no idea what any of the alt right thinks or talks about unless one of you tells me. I follow scientists and particularly economists, and I rely on two people in particular to filter the vast stream of papers produced, down to what I care about.

    I don’t go out looking for interviews. I just take what comes at me. It’s my job to do interviews. I’d do an interview with Salon magazine in they asked me. It doesn’t mean I agree with them.

    I consider myself a conservative libertarian, very close to a Tory in skepticism and sentiment, with a Whig view of history. I consider my work New Right. I agree with the alt right that action must be taken to preserve our people, culture, and civilization for the benefit of our descendants and because of our unique civilization the future of mankind. But my view is nationalism for everyone because globalism is just Abrahamic despotism all over again.

    (FWIW I blocked Khaw because cognitive authoritarianism is neither possible nor desirable without even worse effects that we see from abrahamism – it’s just a mental illness to believe so.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-25 10:04:00 UTC

  • Juries. They Matter

    Juries. They Matter.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-25 02:04:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033173173355929602

    Reply addressees: @Septeus7 @FrameGames

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033163643066544128


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033163643066544128

  • Cause I give a damn about the laboring, working, managing, and entrepreneurial m

    Cause I give a damn about the laboring, working, managing, and entrepreneurial man. That’s why. And I care about my people. And I care enough about mankind to prevent another abrahamic dark age.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-25 00:35:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033150894240608256

  • Well, from one aspie to another, I really don’t recommend burning out that hard.

    Well, from one aspie to another, I really don’t recommend burning out that hard. That was really, really, really bad….. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-23 18:36:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032698227651477504

    Reply addressees: @xmjEE

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032697082006720512


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032697082006720512