Form: Reply

  • Well, induction doesn’t exist right? That’s justificationism, and it’s unscienti

    Well, induction doesn’t exist right? That’s justificationism, and it’s unscientific. Deduction(necessity) > Induction(guess) > Abduction(guess) > Guess(guess) > Free Association (guess). But all are just guesses with less and less constant relations to depend upon.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 18:01:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1072189469317566466

    Reply addressees: @RaduBT

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1072174627517026304


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RaduBT

    @curtdoolittle > constructability vs deducibility.

    This is the scientific method (established by Albertus Magnus), the five methods of induction described by JS Mill and F Bacon (Inductivism). But Magnus used deduction as a axiomatic necessity as well. Both of them have to work together.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1072174627517026304

  • In general anything more than 1% creates a problem. At ~3% you get a faction or

    In general anything more than 1% creates a problem. At ~3% you get a faction or interest group seeking power. At ~6% you get demand for political power. At 9% you have sufficient power to create political opposition. Plenty of research. No question of it. Diversity should be 0.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 17:57:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1072188596164141057

    Reply addressees: @pirateblade86

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1072171072726990853


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1072171072726990853

  • Yes, well, this is a bit of a canard, since it’s one of the most overstated stat

    Yes, well, this is a bit of a canard, since it’s one of the most overstated statements in logic. It applies to very simple arithmetic operations. And there is a difference between constructability (Computability), and deducibility (logic), and the process of elimination.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 14:53:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1072142220030042113

    Reply addressees: @RaduBT

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1072012323219476481


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RaduBT

    @curtdoolittle This is what Kurt Godel said in his Incompleteness theorems, the inherent limitation of every formal axiomatic system in arithmetic (logic). We are limited. To prove the completeness we would have to go outside reference (space&time) and come back to show the proof. Kind of hard.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1072012323219476481

  • “I knew you’d come around to being stoked about these chimp-outs in France.”—M

    —“I knew you’d come around to being stoked about these chimp-outs in France.”—Michael Darr

    Like I said to you before – I don’t open my mouth if I don’t know what the fuck is going on… lol.

    I can tell you that they’re doing it the right way, which is to pick a simple issue to collect enough bodies, and then let the mob’s sense of togetherness and mission expand the scope of the revolt.

    I can tell that they are using digital media to coordinate – although I don’t understand why the govt hasn’t shut it down yet.

    They are organized well enough NOT to chimp out, but to selectively target the right kind of properties and people.

    It’s clear that a leadership is forming.

    It’s clear that they have learned to use young people as human shields (priceless).

    it’s clear that the police aren’t exactly against them.

    It’s clear that while heavily white it’s not exclusively so.

    It’s clear as of today that they’re increasing the radius to make it more difficult to concentrate forces against them.

    And it’s starting to turn into the bigger issue of cultural direction.

    And it’s starting to spread.

    There is propaganda coming out of RT and other russian outlets that is nonsense. Otherwise it’s good.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 11:33:00 UTC

  • “Curt, it is a very popular opinion among many people of all kind of political i

    —“Curt, it is a very popular opinion among many people of all kind of political ideologies, including classical liberals and conservatives, to say Israel and Judaism are part of the West. I have even heard people say they are even inseparable. I very strongly disagree that Judaism/Israel belong to the West and I’m guessing you would agree with me. What do you think about this and what are the strongest arguments to prove this desert people with a totally different cosmovision are NOT part of the West? PS: I can consider them as much part of the West as Japan: just part of the same trade/economic bubble (and a few cultural bonds, but totally different cultural, ethnic and religious origins).”— Tomás Rodriguez Villegas

    Well, I get these questions from all over the world, and I’m not really sure why they are difficult, because they are fairly easy to answer based upon the economic occupations, marriage patterns, nepotistic hiring practices, voting records, political action groups, publication records, media and press records, of different groups. So it’s not a matter of opinion. It’s simply an artifact of the data.

    That said, to put your question in the three major contexts:

    1) Israel was created to (a) export jews out of eurasia given that the ‘problem’ of jewish culture was well understood, (b) provide the west with a new colonial power to oppose the rise of the islamists again without having to occupy territory in the levant, and (c) prevent the spread of communism into muslim lands, and the alliance with Russia and China against the west. So this alliance is largely social, political, military and strategic. If it had not been for the way the germans were tried postwar it is more than likely jews would have been relocated en mass to israel, and that the problem of jewish rule over the levant would have been solved, and jews would have had the population and institutional means of creating a triangular balance of power between Jews, Iranians, and Saudis, with the possibility of Egyptian north africa providing yet another counter-balance.

    2) Europeans, upon the growth of the empires, and then the industrial revolution, increasingly gave the jews more rights and partly converted them to Aristotelianism. In the States there was very little difference between the jews and the upper class protestants of new england until after the first world war. In the south Jews were almost fully integrated, even had christmas trees with six sided stars on top and were being admitted to upper class institutions. It was the eastern european and especially russian jews that had had freedom to excessively parasitize the populations of poland, ukraine, and Russia in particular that came in waves and maintained their behaviors. And it was the combination of postwar guilt by the west (virtue signaling) and the aggressive use of jewish immigrant propaganda in concert with the marxist, communist, socialist, feminist, and counter-western movements that – in very organized fashion still present – prohibited our indoctrination of jews into western traditions and aristotelianism.

    3) Genetically, Ethnically, Culturally, Strategically, Politically, Economically they are, everywhere, and always, (a) separatists,(b) underminers, and (b) a harm to, preying upon, their hosts – primarily through undermining, usury, and allying with the state against the people. And it is in harming their hosts that they are united, just as europeans are more united when expansionary, and less united when not expanding or ‘engaged in some great venture’. The jews now have three foundation myths: the roman, the persecution, and the holocaust. (My work is partly to counter their foundation myths by posing an eternal struggle between their female destructive strategy and our male evolutionary and constructive strategy.) The jewish strategy, like the muslim, is to export males, find weak or marginal females, and to inbreed with them, forming a local kin group in opposition to the host. Then engage in moral, ethical, political conversion (Jewish), religious (muslim), through evangelism(muslim) and propagandism (jews). So in this sense the female branch is actually european, persian, syrian, egyptian, or whatever other group they infiltrate a host. This is why (famously) the jews have been evicted from 109 countries so far. It hasn’t been because they are ‘different’ it’s because they are harmful.

    CLOSING

    So no. It is an easy question to answer: in any matter of conflict do you choose the european, christian, aristotelian duty-hierarchy, or do you choose the semitic, jewish-muslim, abrahamic divisive-equality? The jewish identity remains the issue primarily because it comes with the jewish group evolutionary strategy of undermining the kin group conformity of the west. Jews remain, for thousands of years, levantines, not europeans. You can bring a horse to water but you can’t make it drink so to speak.

    Cheers

    Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 10:22:00 UTC

  • Um. That is a statement the frame of which is religious in origin, and a necessa

    Um. That is a statement the frame of which is religious in origin, and a necessary testimony in the physical sciences. However, conversely, we have no other course of action to take, no other theory to pursue, no evidence to the contrary. Such claims only limit our testimony.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 22:13:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071890573144006658

    Reply addressees: @RaduBT

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071852916636598272


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RaduBT

    @curtdoolittle “We have no right to assume that any physical laws exist, or if they have existed up to now, that they will continue to exist in a similar manner in the future.” ― Max Planck, The Universe in the Light of Modern Physics 1931

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071852916636598272

  • RT @Outsideness: This is why the future is almost certainly Chinese

    RT @Outsideness: This is why the future is almost certainly Chinese.
    https://twitter.com/SenGillibrand/status/1070106980298186753

  • RT @KirkegaardEmil: James Flynn on the ethics of race research

    RT @KirkegaardEmil: James Flynn on the ethics of race research.

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235217300958 https://t.co/gF0b7EQdVs


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 19:50:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071854604948770816

  • ( Brandon Hayes: When you think something needs to be, or will benefit from bein

    ( Brandon Hayes: When you think something needs to be, or will benefit from being on my timeline, or the institute’s, can you share it there? -Hugs )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 10:37:00 UTC

  • John Mark OMFG you are the real deal. Commercial quality persona, content, and p

    John Mark OMFG you are the real deal. Commercial quality persona, content, and production!!!!!!


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 03:17:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071604625936211968