Form: Reply

  • ( Thanks. Only took about four years of pretty hard work to get here… lol ) -h

    ( Thanks. Only took about four years of pretty hard work to get here… lol ) -hugs


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-17 13:01:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074650706290843648

    Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074485430014361600


    IN REPLY TO:

    @PoseidonAwoke

    @curtdoolittle This is excellent. You’ve got it. This is workable. https://t.co/yauQp6HkLC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074485430014361600

  • “How do we repair our religions? Curt Doolittle, what do you think”—Muhamed Du

    —“How do we repair our religions? Curt Doolittle, what do you think”—Muhamed Dukmak

    (a) no more lies (b) make lies prosecutable in court so that the state can’t intervene, (c) prosecute liars for profit until there are no more lies. (d) let our religions adapt to the prohibition on lies, (e) try to organize new religions (which is likely to include restoration of our folk religions), (f) and let the natural self interest of all of us take its course.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-17 10:32:00 UTC

  • BUT, THAT’S WHAT LAW MEANS —“It’s the law because it’s the law, accept it” see

    BUT, THAT’S WHAT LAW MEANS

    —“It’s the law because it’s the law, accept it” seems like absolutism— Hue Whitman

    That’s what Laws of Nature(unconscious, deterministic) and Natural Law (conscious, volitionary) mean: they are DESCRIPTIVE. You cannot violate the laws of nature but you can manipulate them. You can violate the natural laws, and pay the consequences. The natural world already calculates its optimum, and we ‘cheat’ it. The natural law is something else men cheat. However, the optimum method of human evolution is the elimination of cheating (parasitism). If you eliminate all parasitism you end up with natural law. If you do not then you don’t.

    That’s what “Law” means “Decidable” in scientific language, and which means “Absolute” in archaic moral language.

    We have ‘appropriated’ the term ‘law’ in science, and reframed the original meaning of law as the series Findings of Common Law (Court), Command(Ruler), Legislation(Government), Regulation(Bureaucracy).

    The Continental system of law is different in this hierarchy since the continent uses Roman and Napoleonic law, and the state is separate from the people, whereas in Anglo (Scandinavian) Civilization, the Rulers are just current members of the people.

    This subtle difference is profound in consequence between the continental and intercontinental (anglo) civilizations.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-17 09:09:00 UTC

  • “What are your thoughts on learned intelligence,cause intelligence? Can we there

    —“What are your thoughts on learned intelligence,cause intelligence? Can we therefore train people to be intelligent(by following certain laws),for example charlie munger has a law of “always arguing the other side better than the opponent”,so did Cicero,and it a nice way of avoiding confirmation bias ,if we create certain rules such as these and train people(like dogs),will we increase their intelligence”— Abhimanyu Karnawat

    There are three issues here. And I’m going to expand the range of your question from intelligence to intuition to political consequences.

    The first is that intelligence improves with the ability to use language and ideas to calculate. In other words, if you learn english and science and logica, and mathematics a PEOPLE will get smarter by about a standard deviation or so. But it lifts all people in the culture equally. So it’s not so much that we improve the brain but that we improve the precision of it’s means of calculation by better information.

    The Second is whether people can produce what we call mindfulness through various trainings (equation, discipline, ritual, practice). The other is whether we know what to train them IN (content).

    I want to know how to eliminate all falsehood from that training (content) and any externalities (side effects) caused by the method of practice.

    The third is that Everyone in the world wants to preserve his favorite falsehoods – because they’re culture, class, gender and era dependent.

    I want to know what is NOT dependent upon those biases.

    That’s science.

    Now, I am going to clearly bias myself to naturalism because I’m definitely on the Naturalist (scientific) Nature worshiping (old religions), Pagan(hearth religion) side of the anglo scandinavian and german tradition. I know that. I know that is my bias.

    The question is whether those biases matter if we get the science right. And I think they don’t.

    Particularly for hindu since all in all it’s a pretty awesome religion that scaled nicely.

    In my undrestanding the Japanese resisted religion the longest because they had no reason for it.

    The chinese and japanese governments were either advocats or forcible imposers of buddhism. There were reasons for doing it and they weren’t good.

    The west had no need of religion either. It was forced on them , and then coerced upon them.

    I am slowly gaining an understanding of the spread of religion across india and I think it is the most ‘faithful’ to folk religions.

    I have only recently come to understand that there is good secular work in indian history – very far back in time. And I have begun studying it a bit. The content is purely empirical and practical and of exceptional quality – equal if not better than the chinese (who are have a problem with loving poetic sounding prose).

    I think it is terribly easy to rid the world of Abrahamism in all its forms if we have yet another more secular or naturalist reformation of christianity in the west and bring it closer to our ancestral religion of the hearth home and nature.

    But it is not something easily done. And the world has only one enemy today: the followers of the abrahamic religion and their cult of revolution and conquest.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-16 12:29:00 UTC

  • for me it’s to stop them as much as it is to help us. we don’t need much help ot

    for me it’s to stop them as much as it is to help us. we don’t need much help other than to stop the defecting of our women.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-16 11:46:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074269606750113792

    Reply addressees: @StirlingFinn

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074259147648950273


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074259147648950273

  • “….you don’t seem to understand metaphysics. Deep myth and the unconscious are

    —“….you don’t seem to understand metaphysics. Deep myth and the unconscious are on a completely different tangent to most of what your work is about,…”— ]

    It’s ok. But I think I understand just fine thanks.

    Addiction responses to pleasure sources, particularly escapist pleasure sources are indifferent between humans. That which tastes, touches, sounds, appears, intuits to be preferable, good, useful, even wonderful, has little or no correlation to what is, especially cumulatively, good. It is not like our evolution has kept pace with our experiential innovation.

    REST VS ESCAPE

    Our neural economy is expensive. Managing our neural, emotional, and physical budgets is work. Hence why we – most of us – seek means of finding safety in or near, the pack or herd. Worse, those of us who spend greater effort suppression our impulses, and those who expend greater effort while resulting in continuous failure or at least stagnation, seek those comforts mentally, emotionally, physically, and economically and politically.

    The civil society gives us rest.

    The undiscovered valley (nature) gives us some escape and rest.

    The alternatives give us not rest but escape.

    And some alternatives give us no rest, but escape at the cost of harm to ourselves.

    And some at the cost to ourselves and others.

    ESCAPE TO IMAGINARY WORLDS

    While it is true that many we can forecast many world, and assist each other in the forecasting of many worlds, and that, from these many worlds we can obtain ideation, and we can obtain the psychic rewards from investment in those many worlds, and that we can interpret the present in the context of those many worlds, the fact remains that we can do so with every possible grammar available to us. We can do so by planning a future. we can do so by daydreaming. We can so by conversing with others. By all sorts of play and entertainment. We can do so by reading. We can do this by ritual inducing. We can do it by social inducing – particularly in large groups. We can do so by drug inducing.

    THE PROBLEM IS NOT THE GOOD – BUT THE BAD

    The question is not how we produce these alternate worlds and obtain the results – looking only at the good of the phenomenon. But how can we prevent the production, and distribution, of those fantasies in those imaginary worlds that affect the present and future.

    The evidence is what it is. And Study of comparative means of obtaining mindfulness simply results in the understanding that religion as we understand it – not as it was originally founded, or not as we can undrestand it today – is one of the worst things to every happen to mankind – in fact, judaism, islam, and christianity are second only to the great plagues. And even that it requires us to compare with our ancient enemy malaria to compete with those three religions.

    There have been at least three dark ages. THe stone age, the bronze age, the iron age. And it looks very much like we have spent a century falling into the dark age of the steel age.

    FOOLED US ONCE. FOOLING US TWICE.

    We are at a precipice for our people and our religion is part of the problem, and our church has abandoned us to the third world, and our governments have done exactly as did the byzantines and romans.

    They are dragging us into the only hell there is: genetic death.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-15 16:45:00 UTC

  • Jonathan: Main differences in ‘Moral Foundations’ across civilizations appear to

    Jonathan: Main differences in ‘Moral Foundations’ across civilizations appear to be (a) Truth regardless of Cost vs Face regardless of Truth, and (b) position on the Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Universalist spectrum. Do you plan to extend MF to group differences? @JonHaidt


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 15:18:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1073235711069970432

  • Yeah well, we both know that’s the net of it, but i can’t just run around tellin

    Yeah well, we both know that’s the net of it, but i can’t just run around telling the domesticated animal stock that they are both mere domesticated animals, and that they are so because they are too stupid to be otherwise. … They make lots of fuss when I do that. 😉 -hugs


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 00:16:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1073008653802897413

    Reply addressees: @MartianOrthodox

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1073007039125876738


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1073007039125876738

  • Power words?

    Power words?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-12 23:54:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1073003101253193734

    Reply addressees: @daedalusanimus @LPNational

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1073001394226036736


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1073001394226036736

  • So you made your accusation based upon the content of my profile?

    So you made your accusation based upon the content of my profile?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-12 23:43:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1073000513355083777

    Reply addressees: @daedalusanimus @LPNational

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1072999841377255425


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1072999841377255425