Note “boomer” is a filtered word in my feed. You see your comment. No one else does.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 13:54:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100031276336197633
Form: Reply
-
photos_and_videos/MobileUploads_TqQ5PW13Eg/52757178_10157012409487264_8742661198
photos_and_videos/MobileUploads_TqQ5PW13Eg/52757178_10157012409487264_8742661198094270464_n_10157012409482264.jpg Correct. It’s to prove my points. There is no other reason for tolerating non argument.Curt DoolittleNAXALT WARNING.
All women may demonstrate these behaviours but some women control them because they have learned mindfulness.Feb 25, 2019, 11:56 AMCurt DoolittleErgo it is equally valuable to attract and retain women of mindfulness in order to illustrate the LIMIT of the general rule.Feb 25, 2019, 11:56 AMGibson Atlas”Waaah misogyny!”
No, do better than yesterday, lady.
“REEE Patriarchy!”
I said do better, not try harder.Feb 25, 2019, 12:06 PMCurt DoolittleLuís F. Rodrigues yep.Feb 25, 2019, 12:08 PMRichard HallGibson Atlas Patriarchy just means meritocracy.Feb 25, 2019, 12:29 PMDan AltschuldI think I know to what and who this refers but I didn’t follow the conversation until afterwards.
I’m genuinely curious why the person was blocked. I didn’t see what line was crossed. Can you explain this?Feb 25, 2019, 12:48 PMAndrew GribbleCurt Doolittle I’ve heard it said that those examples have a “male mind”.Feb 25, 2019, 1:16 PMNick DahlheimDerrida has met his match with Doolittle…. :PFeb 25, 2019, 2:03 PMCorrect. It’s to prove my points. There is no other reason for tolerating non argument.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 11:54:00 UTC
-
Note “boomer” is a filtered word in my feed. You see your comment. No one else d
Note “boomer” is a filtered word in my feed. You see your comment. No one else does.
—“Why though?”–Spencer Randolph
It’s a non-argument, usually used against me, when in fact, I am a member of the Jones generation (between boomers and Gen X) like Gates, Ellison, and Jobs, and I don’t share ANY values with the boomers. I want to end them. And make them pay. Jones generation is star wars/indiana jones/blade runner/alien Neuromancer/Snow Crash, first home computers, first video game consoles, and the founders of the tech boom.
—“Fair enough. How would you describe the epidemic of political ineptitude displayed in large part by the particular aforementioned and verboten generation?”—Spencer Randolph
I don’t disagree with criticisms of boomers. I disagree that I”m a boomer.
Demographers classify generations by population cycles.
Social Scientists classify generations by shared experience and values.
I hated those ‘boomer’ fkers and I still do.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 08:54:00 UTC
-
immigration of underclasses
immigration of underclasses
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 00:01:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099821735552126976
Reply addressees: @FirstRealNews1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099817175223816193
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099817175223816193
-
(Well, I grew up thinking I was going to fight in Vietnam or be nuked by the Rus
(Well, I grew up thinking I was going to fight in Vietnam or be nuked by the Russians. Now it’s just fight here at home, or be genocided by The Flood.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 23:32:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099814278134140929
-
Well done
Well done. https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/1099452947346477062
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 17:19:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099720368091287555
https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/1099452947346477062
-
That would not be a cost on a demonstrated in vestment, but instead, an attempt
That would not be a cost on a demonstrated in vestment, but instead, an attempt to skirt the cost of self regulation in defense of the commons. In other words, the speaker would be committing evidence that he was a free rider (a criminal).
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 17:18:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099720143922520065
Reply addressees: @rohansharan @mmay3r
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099701981520777217
IN REPLY TO:
@rohansharan
@curtdoolittle @mmay3r What if someone argues that hurting their feelings is an imposition of costs upon them by you and force you with your own rule of law that you should create “safe spaces”.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099701981520777217
-
well done
well done.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 17:16:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099719686021885952
Reply addressees: @Mesaiarchy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099712365531201537
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099712365531201537
-
right question. well done
right question. well done.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 15:00:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099685418667253760
Reply addressees: @ArielFelidae
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099557441145057285
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099557441145057285
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52647513_10157010566322264_810926486
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52647513_10157010566322264_8109264868961419264_o_10157010566307264.jpg Bill JoslinAnd generous tit-for-tat doesn’t imply unbound forgiveness, but rather occasional deviations from tit-for-tat towards generousity (forgiveness). It essentially resets the game for cooperation when cooperation has failed.
Eye-for-an-eye in most things with an occasional “turn the other cheek” to re-establish trust and Cooperation (which would be a second order reciprocal exchange – offering forgiveness now to secure the opportunity to be forgiven in the future if you screw up later) – otherwise known as incremental supression (I see incremental supression as attempting to achieve an optimum between forbearance and prosecution)Feb 24, 2019, 2:39 PMGreg HamiltonI don’t know Freyr is a pretty good role model…Feb 24, 2019, 5:49 PMPaul BardDidn’t Axelrod find the optimal strategy was exhaustive forgiveness, because tit-for-tat may be wrongly triggered by poor or mistaken information about your trading partners?
In other words, we can’t be sure the other isn’t doing their best to reciprocate, but we can definitively use force to oppose the other from doing harm.Feb 24, 2019, 9:52 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 14:11:00 UTC