That would not be a cost on a demonstrated in vestment, but instead, an attempt to skirt the cost of self regulation in defense of the commons. In other words, the speaker would be committing evidence that he was a free rider (a criminal).
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 17:18:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099720143922520065
Reply addressees: @rohansharan @mmay3r
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099701981520777217
IN REPLY TO:
@rohansharan
@curtdoolittle @mmay3r What if someone argues that hurting their feelings is an imposition of costs upon them by you and force you with your own rule of law that you should create “safe spaces”.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099701981520777217
Leave a Reply