hugs. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 06:18:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795701193181974576
Reply addressees: @ch35614
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795680607592485308
hugs. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 06:18:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795701193181974576
Reply addressees: @ch35614
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795680607592485308
Correct. Women have women emotions that no good comes of. But we excuse it, and women deny they need excusing.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 06:16:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795700599587311880
Reply addressees: @SophieShay @WallStreetSilv
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795698267159924812
I’m saying people act in their self interest and do so when they run out of options. We are running out of options rather quickly. Wether social, political, economic, demographic, or geostrategic. And we’re running out of them all at the same time. So expect people to act…
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 02:38:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795645801529561334
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795640371885793462
RT @Psyche_OS: Read this and bookmark it.
You’ll thank me later.
You’ve probably sensed much or all of this but couldn’t articulate it.
O…
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 00:34:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795614673141907520
Thanks. You’re opinion matters to me.
(I finally feel like my health and mind have recovered to pre-covid conditions. So I’m doing better work again.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 00:32:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795614085792579957
Reply addressees: @Psyche_OS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795611394630619270
sure, read medieval english law.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 23:33:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795599380080443709
Reply addressees: @JimReckoning @WallStreetSilv
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795598418058105039
–Q: Curt: “Can you elaborate on the “equal suppression in law of female antisocial and anti political behaviour as that of men”?”—
Correct. While the common law of england included prohibitions on female antisocial behavior, (what I call GSRRM, which you can search for in my fee), the law against male behavior increased with male agency, rather rapidly after the years 700-1000 depending upon where you were in Europe. With “genetic pacification” being the result: hanging 1% of the population every generation, and war and disease taking care of the rest.
Conversely, women lacked agency until the industrial revolution. And we only integrated them into the labor force and the franchise (voting) after the first world war, and only massively into the work force and education after 1960.
So it took time for the traditional behaviors to dissipate and new generations to abandon them.
And it coincided with the movement of the marxist school from europe using class marxism, to the USA using race marxism (which means it’s just about those who lack productive ability seeking power, not about achieving good).
So with the success of the left in undermining our institutions beginning with our universities then our press, then our education system, it took time for the seditionist movements to do their work across generations, and the result has been the present set of crises.
In retrospect had we brought forward those common law prohibitions – most of which are interference, speech, ‘kings peace’, and liability related – then none of this would have been possible.
And as such the laws can be constructed to suppress the feminine antisocial behavior we’ve observed just as we incrementally suppressed the masculine antisocial behavior we observed a few centuries earlier as men were able to experiment tiven the new technologies of agrarian production, steel, ships, and gunpowder.
Sedition is women’s gunpowder, lies are their rifles, and pretense of victimhood and innocence their shields.
Cheers
CD
Reply addressees: @JimReckoning @WallStreetSilv
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 22:58:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795590586390417408
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795579659574538290
Yes. Same. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 22:02:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795576320493261191
Reply addressees: @lerpclide40920
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795576051449688421
yes. ALL THE TIME. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 21:35:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795569531970351230
Reply addressees: @SurragoMichael
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795562241624019194
Have I told you I appreciate you lately? lol. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 19:37:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795539971836965249
Reply addressees: @orion_pulse
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795508997073564140