—“…in a recent article by John Van Engen.54 In it, he discusses the current debate among historians as to whether or not “medieval culture was essentially ‘Christian’ or ‘Catholic.’ “55 As Van Engen notes, some historians now claim that, outside of a minuscule clerical elite, “the great mass of medieval folk lived in a ‘folklore’ culture best likened to that observed by anthropologists in Third World countries.”56”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 22:46:00 UTC
CHRISTIANITY IS NOT A PRODUCT OF ITS ORIGINS, BUT OF ITS TRANSFORMATION INTO GERMANICIZED FOLK RELIGION – RE-INSTITUTIONALIZED UNDER COLONIALISM.
—-…”a concept is not best understood in light of its origins, but rather in light of the direction in which the tradition is moving. To take Christianity as a notorious example: I do not believe that the truth of Christianity will best be elucidated by a search for its origins, but rather by an observation of its development in tradition. This approach is a reversal of the assumption that has dominated Christian and much other religious scholarship for a very long time, an assumption characterized by the genetic fallacy: that the true meaning of a word—or of an idea—lies in its pristine state.48″—-
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 22:42:00 UTC
—“Discoveries [were] made by church workers in regions and in a period where we would assume particularly deep and well-instructed religiosity: Saxony and the neighboring parts of Germany around 1600. Once out of the upper-class circles, however, and even in a time of bitter theological rivalries to concentrate the greatest possible attention on the faith, the
vast bulk of the population are found to have been largely or totally ignorant of the simplest matters of doctrine, rarely or never attending church. . . . “They were given over to “soothsayers, cunning women, crystal-gazers, casters of spells, witches, and other practitioners of forbidden arts.”—tGoEMC
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 22:38:00 UTC
—“Elites developed the industrial revolution, not peasants in the field or sitting around the table at dinner time. Like always elites create innovations and the masses follow along. They weren’t tricked into it, anymore than the elites were tricked into inventing things. It’s natural. The idea that there is some kind of intrinsic abuse of workers by the elites assumes “generational agency” on both parts to get to where we are that doesn’t exist….off the top of my head.”—Mike Harvey
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 10:26:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48275433_10156843735022264_145502531231940608_n_10156843735017264.jpg (No idea who authored it. but got it Via James)Brandon Hayeshttps://www.facebook.com/Propertarian-Meme-Depositorium-230026437866938/Dec 13, 2018, 9:40 AMJohn EdwardThis is goodDec 13, 2018, 9:49 AMCurtus MaximusWord is really getting out. I’m seeing a resurgence in propertarianism.Dec 13, 2018, 10:12 AMJohn MarkOh yeah. This will be in my next vid.Dec 13, 2018, 10:21 AMBrandon HayesWe’ll get it up on the Institutes page once you’ve finished; I’ll put together some supplements.Dec 13, 2018, 10:22 AMCurt Doolittle1) John Mark is making a huge difference. it’s insane how effective he’s been already. He is more effective than everyone else combined. 2) Bill is now the real deal and I’m not alone on the podium. 3) Bill’s crew has finished baking giving us a sort of minimum critical mass of talent. 4) I’ve begun talking about revolution directly, 5) like I said, we actually have a solution, and no one else does, so as I predicted ‘natural force of gravity will advance us because of it’. 6) yellow vests, brexit, US election, trump condition, and citizen ‘political exhaustion’ have moved practical revolt into the overton window.Dec 13, 2018, 10:24 AMJohn MarkBrandon Hayes sounds goodDec 13, 2018, 10:26 AMAndrew DawsonI’m really excited Curt. I feel like a kid in the Lego storeDec 13, 2018, 10:45 AMJacob SmithThis meme is so true. I’ve learned more about the world from your reading list than from any of the libertarian books I had read before.Dec 13, 2018, 11:10 AMChristopher M MatthewsThe girl on the right should say (((libertarianism)))Dec 13, 2018, 12:52 PMCurt Doolittlemade my day. every time I hear that it makes my day. -hugsDec 13, 2018, 1:04 PMCurt Doolittleouch… niceDec 13, 2018, 1:05 PMJohn John StephensI’m seeing the growth, but I tell you, it is not easy to digest it all (and it is still growing). I thought I would have done it months ago, as I am fairly intelligent and read a ton. But man, there is so much depth to it. I wish I had more time to spend studying it, but at 44, I work a demanding full time job, go to college full time (studying Business Management), and homeschool 2 teenagers. To say I stay busy is an understatement.
Also, it matches many conclusion I had already came to on my own, so I must question it even more so at every step. Falsification is your friend. But sometimes I overthink, I believe. Deflating grammar has probably been the most difficult part for me, so if anyone has any suggestions on that part, I am open to them and would be appreciative.
And so many sacred cows that must be slain. I few people I have tried to bring into the fold did not understand it or refuse to sacrifice their sacred cows to truth. I have a few friends that I have painfully watched accept non-operational utopian talking points, but either refused to take the time to research propertarianism, or could not grasp it. And honestly, I point them to the Institute for research, as I am not to the point to be able to break it down and explain it in layman’s terms. I plan on attempting again soon, now that John Mark has made them easier to digest videos.
Curt, love you brother!Dec 14, 2018, 12:33 AMCurt DoolittleJohn John Stephens love you back. ;)Dec 14, 2018, 4:24 AMJames Fox HigginsI’ve got John Mark booked in for my show next week. It’s going to be hard to ignore these ideas soon.Dec 15, 2018, 5:28 PM(No idea who authored it. but got it Via James)
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 09:38:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48275433_10156843735022264_145502531231940608_n_10156843735017264.jpg (No idea who authored it. but got it Via James)Brandon Hayeshttps://www.facebook.com/Propertarian-Meme-Depositorium-230026437866938/Dec 13, 2018, 9:40 AMJohn EdwardThis is goodDec 13, 2018, 9:49 AMCurtus MaximusWord is really getting out. I’m seeing a resurgence in propertarianism.Dec 13, 2018, 10:12 AMJohn MarkOh yeah. This will be in my next vid.Dec 13, 2018, 10:21 AMBrandon HayesWe’ll get it up on the Institutes page once you’ve finished; I’ll put together some supplements.Dec 13, 2018, 10:22 AMCurt Doolittle1) John Mark is making a huge difference. it’s insane how effective he’s been already. He is more effective than everyone else combined. 2) Bill is now the real deal and I’m not alone on the podium. 3) Bill’s crew has finished baking giving us a sort of minimum critical mass of talent. 4) I’ve begun talking about revolution directly, 5) like I said, we actually have a solution, and no one else does, so as I predicted ‘natural force of gravity will advance us because of it’. 6) yellow vests, brexit, US election, trump condition, and citizen ‘political exhaustion’ have moved practical revolt into the overton window.Dec 13, 2018, 10:24 AMJohn MarkBrandon Hayes sounds goodDec 13, 2018, 10:26 AMAndrew DawsonI’m really excited Curt. I feel like a kid in the Lego storeDec 13, 2018, 10:45 AMJacob Long SmithThis meme is so true. I’ve learned more about the world from your reading list than from any of the libertarian books I had read before.Dec 13, 2018, 11:10 AMChristopher M MatthewsThe girl on the right should say (((libertarianism)))Dec 13, 2018, 12:52 PMCurt Doolittlemade my day. every time I hear that it makes my day. -hugsDec 13, 2018, 1:04 PMCurt Doolittleouch… niceDec 13, 2018, 1:05 PMJohn John StephensI’m seeing the growth, but I tell you, it is not easy to digest it all (and it is still growing). I thought I would have done it months ago, as I am fairly intelligent and read a ton. But man, there is so much depth to it. I wish I had more time to spend studying it, but at 44, I work a demanding full time job, go to college full time (studying Business Management), and homeschool 2 teenagers. To say I stay busy is an understatement.
Also, it matches many conclusion I had already came to on my own, so I must question it even more so at every step. Falsification is your friend. But sometimes I overthink, I believe. Deflating grammar has probably been the most difficult part for me, so if anyone has any suggestions on that part, I am open to them and would be appreciative.
And so many sacred cows that must be slain. I few people I have tried to bring into the fold did not understand it or refuse to sacrifice their sacred cows to truth. I have a few friends that I have painfully watched accept non-operational utopian talking points, but either refused to take the time to research propertarianism, or could not grasp it. And honestly, I point them to the Institute for research, as I am not to the point to be able to break it down and explain it in layman’s terms. I plan on attempting again soon, now that John Mark has made them easier to digest videos.
Curt, love you brother!Dec 14, 2018, 12:33 AMCurt DoolittleJohn John Stephens love you back. ;)Dec 14, 2018, 4:24 AMJames Fox HigginsI’ve got John Mark booked in for my show next week. It’s going to be hard to ignore these ideas soon.Dec 15, 2018, 5:28 PM(No idea who authored it. but got it Via James)
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 09:38:00 UTC
–“In a discussion of Japanese religious psychology, Brendan Branley, a Maryknoll missionary to Japan, has noted that “essentially, there is a heightened consciousness of their identity as a distinct people, of their membership in a group whose purposes they are willing to serve at the expense of their own.”
This observation is supported by Robert BelSah’s analysis
of the relationship between Japanese religion and economic development. Bellah describes the enduring notion of kokutai, which arose during the Tokugawa Period (1600-1868) as “a concept of the state in which religious, political and familistic ideas are indissolubly merged.”39 Jesuit missionaries to China in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were similarly confronted with a high level of organic unity that was expressed through ancestor and emperor worship.
A strong sense of social unity and collective security also prevailed among the Germanic peoples in the early Middle Ages. Although they may have been less culturally sophisticated than the contemporary Japanese, like them, the Germanic peoples did not have immediate social or spiritual needs which Christianity might fulfill. Also, the homogeneity of early medieval Germanic society, like that of contemporary Japan, did not predispose it to the Christian message. Christianity tends to flourish in heterogeneous societies in which there exist high levels of anomie, or social destabilization. Since the relationship of social structure to ideological structure and religious expression will play a significant role in this inquiry, a brief discussion of fundamental concepts is presented here.
Similarly, the Anglo-Saxon missionaries did not emphasize the central soteriological and eschatological aspects of Christianity. Instead, seeking to appeal to the Germanic regard for power, they tended to emphasize the omnipotence of the Christian God and the temporal rewards he would bestow upon those who accepted him through baptism and through conformity to the discipline of his Church.52 Other medieval advocates of Christianity, such as the authors of the Heliand53 and The Dream of the Rood,54 apparently sought to appeal to the Germanic ethos and world-view by portraying Christ as a warrior lord.”—
from The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity by James Russell
https://propertarianism.files.wordpress.com/2018/12/russell-james-c-the-germanization-of-early-medieval-christianity-_-a-sociohistorical-approach-to-religious-transformation-1994-oxford-university-press.pdf
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-12 18:49:00 UTC
DIFFERENCES
—“Compared with Whites, Native Hawaiians had higher androstenedione (+22%, P = 0.017), total testosterone (+26%, P = 0.013), bioavailable testosterone (+33%, P = 0.002), E1 (≥21%; P = 0.009), total E2 (+26%, P = 0.001), bioavailable E2 (+31%, P < 0.001), and lower SHBG (−12% P = 0.07) levels. Compared with Whites, Japanese Americans had higher E2 (+15%, P = 0.036) and bioavailable E2 (+18%, P = 0.024) levels. African Americans also had higher E1 (+21%, P = 0.004), E2 (+20%, P = 0.007), and bioavailable E2 (+20%, P = 0.015) levels compared with Whites, whereas mean levels in Latinas were similar to those of Whites.”—-
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-12 16:07:00 UTC
by Pat Ryan
To recap, stem cells are coerced into specialization as a byproduct of endless bacteriophage and virus flow perpetually offsetting the magnificent exponential power of mitosis. Having one universal cell for all time proved to be impossible due to potentially fatal delays in energy availability.
AKA energy isn’t universally abundant for the singular cell and so pressures selected for different cellular strategies. Mitosis speed variation, thickness in membranes, organelle placement and function, replication techniques, DNA structure, RNA methodology, etc. Each variable tuned ever so slightly per generation and tested under the crucible of entropy and bacteriophage. Specialization was inevitable under these circumstances.
Cells do “cooperate” in a manner that their structural biases assume other systemic pressures will be reliably available. For example, most cells don’t handle their own immunological defensiveness because they have grown to assume an immune system is actively on the job. This is less a “cooperation” in an empathy sense and more of a “we don’t know any better, we just do one thing” ecosystem adapting to its own metastructure.
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-12 03:57:00 UTC
—“I’ve never been a fan of Mr. Doolittle. Most of his commentary is pure gibberish. Written as if he were drunk at the time.”— Chris Shaeffer
Why I am harder to understand than Bohm Bawerk, Nietzsche, Hegel, or Heidegger is beyond me. I think the principle difference between readers who grasp quickly and those who don’t is of course, IQ, but whether you have been exposed to the scientific method, programming, and economics sufficiently to ‘think scientifically’ in each of the dimensions: diligence(Science), operations(programming), equilibrations(economics). There are twenty something novel inventions in propertarianism. They can easily be understood. What is difficult is putting them into practice – particularly use of the definitions, series, incentives, and their equilibrations.
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-11 10:54:00 UTC