Form: Quote Commentary

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51467513_10156982045137264_7560108894500945920_n_10156982045127264.jpg ;)Tom BielerAre these available in a a PVC patch with hook and loop on the back of it?Feb 12, 2019, 2:40 PMCurt Doolittlejust market testing . final yes. robes, hoodies, caps, shirts…Feb 12, 2019, 2:41 PMChip SillsLike itFeb 12, 2019, 2:46 PMRadu M OleniucA better one: 🙂

“Oderint dum metuant” – Let them hate me, so that they will but fear me.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152206622321565&set=a.110896166564&type=3&theaterFeb 12, 2019, 2:50 PMJustin RockwellWhat’s the meaning or story behind the black Swan and such?Feb 12, 2019, 2:50 PMWilliam ViergeverCurt Doolittle ??? no branding irons??Feb 12, 2019, 2:51 PMMatt Evansguess: black swans “never” happenFeb 12, 2019, 2:51 PMCurt Doolittleand … therefore the institute logo. ;)Feb 12, 2019, 2:52 PMJustin RockwellCurt Doolittle just getting caught up on the blog and found it, it’s alot of information to process and sift through I’ve only been reading all this for a couple of days nowFeb 12, 2019, 2:53 PMMatt EvansYou aren’t serious until you get someone like PalmettoState Armory to sell AR-15 lowers with this engraving on the mag well

[I laughed so hard when I saw them selling “No Step on Snek” lowers 🙂 ]Feb 12, 2019, 2:53 PMDaniel JacksonI’ll take 6 robesFeb 12, 2019, 2:54 PMCurt Doolittle^ trying to determine whether manufacturer can meet demand. ;)Feb 12, 2019, 2:55 PMRichard HallCan I get this on an arm band?Feb 12, 2019, 2:55 PMDaniel JacksonLet me know when the product is readyFeb 12, 2019, 2:55 PMCurt DoolittleWilliam Viergever brillliant. will do.Feb 12, 2019, 2:56 PMBene HarrisonI would love a propertarian hook and loop patchFeb 12, 2019, 2:56 PMDaniel JacksonFerrum est ad felicitatem via tuaFeb 12, 2019, 2:56 PMMatt Evansso, I am not good at latin, but online transation tools seem to want that word to be “Sigilium”, not “Sigilum” for the translation to make sense. they don’t know what “Sigilum” is, whereas “Sigilium” seems to make sense in context…Feb 12, 2019, 2:56 PMBill Joslin(the tree of life – better IMO)Feb 12, 2019, 2:57 PMRussell WagnerI’m diggin’ the Black Swan. Following…Feb 12, 2019, 2:58 PMMatthew VölkischPARA

BELLUM

D E U S

V U L TFeb 12, 2019, 4:12 PMThomas NorgateLooks lovely but can you/another explain the words and swan to me?Feb 12, 2019, 4:20 PMCurt Doolittle(based upon the templar sigil)

“The Sigil of Militia of Natural Law”

“Truth and Violence”Feb 12, 2019, 4:28 PMThomas NorgateThorsten NorgateFeb 12, 2019, 4:41 PMVinny VidivicciMy job when I was in the military was intelligence. I remember constantly watching the feeds for activities of the black swans. I thought they were the “bad guys”.Feb 12, 2019, 4:50 PMJeff UrizenWatch this 4 part documentary if you have the time https://youtu.be/DotBVZ26asIFeb 12, 2019, 4:56 PMBill Joslin;-)Feb 12, 2019, 4:58 PMTyler Karl LiaGo with Anglo-Saxon. We don’t need to cuck with Latin.Feb 12, 2019, 5:49 PMTyler Karl LiaThere is nothing innately more cultured or poetic about Latin. The use of Latin in the place of our Germanic tongue has never made sense to me.

We are not Roman or Latin – most (white) Americans are of Northwestern European ancestry and our founders were of Anglo-Saxon and Dutch blood.

Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin were both highly interested in Anglo-Saxon, the former wanted it taught in schools and the latter wanted it for our legal tongue.

Such thoughts would only strengthen our Folk as a whole and provide us with depth and roots.

Play around with this: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/fulk%C4%85

You will have to look up the grammar, but this is a great source for etymology.Feb 12, 2019, 6:26 PMMark FisherAfter reading this post and comments, literally scrolling a couple posts down, my extremely liberal sister-in-law (bless her heart [as we say in the south]) had post this pic in a totally unrelated and non-political context.

I was struck by the symbolism. Pardon the randomness good sirs. It has been a “day”.

Love the idea presented above…Feb 12, 2019, 7:07 PMZach QuarryIf you make a patch offer it in Coyote. Some guy’s will want that.Feb 12, 2019, 7:53 PMCurt Doolittlewhat is Coyote?Feb 12, 2019, 7:54 PMZach QuarryA color.Feb 12, 2019, 7:55 PMCurt DoolittleTan you mean? Yes?Feb 12, 2019, 7:55 PMZach QuarryLike for desert or multicam patterns. Black will stick out.Feb 12, 2019, 7:55 PMZach QuarryIt’s a little darker. I’m not gonna be gay about it. Tan will work.Feb 12, 2019, 7:56 PMBill JoslinBlack, coyote, and ODFeb 12, 2019, 8:11 PMZach QuarryBill Joslin Maybe a limited run HawaiianFeb 12, 2019, 8:14 PMDarren HowellJustin Rockwell mate, get back to us after a couple of months… just don’t forget to ask questions whenever and wherever you need clarification! Curt is only too happy to help!!👌Feb 13, 2019, 3:51 AMJosé Francisco MayoraViolence is truth.Feb 13, 2019, 4:26 AMGuillermo CammareriGreat documentary, and today makes more sense. Freud, Bernays and today the CEO/creator of Netflix.

All from the same family. Amazing.Feb 13, 2019, 3:45 PMStephen ThomasThe Militia of Natural Law hmmm

Or

The Natural Law Militia

I like bothFeb 13, 2019, 4:53 PMMike FeeneyI’d choose a different font. Looks like Copperplate. How about Optima (ExtraBlack):Feb 14, 2019, 1:33 AMRoss LampersOMG just looked up the symbolism of the black swan on Wikipedia…

Just a giant mug shot of Curt chilling at home.Feb 14, 2019, 4:54 PMRoss LampersFeb 14, 2019, 4:54 PMRoss LampersSummary: “READ SIEGE FACKOT”

Ref. Citations:

FBI .gov/trickshot-honeypotFeb 14, 2019, 5:02 PMGeorg BühlerThe Latin is incorrect…. It should say “veritas et violentia”.Feb 14, 2019, 8:45 PMCurt Doolittlewhat is the correct latin for “truth and violence”Feb 14, 2019, 8:52 PMSeth BarcelloSigillum militum iuris naturalis

veritas et violentiaFeb 15, 2019, 6:09 AMGeorg BühlerThere is no “m” neededFeb 15, 2019, 8:34 AM;)

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52498681_10156980434342264_5122284834521088000_o_10156980434332264.jpg THE TWO OBJECTIONSConnor CreeganI guess I would say that the problem lies in the assumption that there is a valid motivational arm correspondent with the arm of your philosophy. You’ve stated before that your system has a “demand” for an aesthetic component, but any reasonable aesthetic component will naturally run contrary to it because literary experiences are, in essence, at odds with excessive use of operational language. So which is it, do we “read Siege” to motivate revolution only to prosecute against the publication of Siege once regime change has occurred, or do we remain purists and hope that present measured material incentives are enough?Feb 12, 2019, 3:31 PMCurt DoolittleNot logical. There is plenty of motivational content that is not false. I just don’t say what political organization, and what mythology, and what mission one must choose – because theya re utilitarian.

I lay out what I think the optimum (most competitive) form of government is that will provide the highest returns for european peoples. I suggest what I think might be the optimum religious content.

But propertarianism like law is ‘via negativa’. Anything that is not false or parasitic is ‘good’. I don’t need to choose ‘the good’ I just need to remove all ‘bad’.

If you need to lie to do it and it includes parasitism on your own then it is not a good. It’s just admission of failure.

Your argument is that all goods consist of lies, and that’s false.Feb 12, 2019, 5:03 PMConnor CreeganDeception, in your philosophy, is contingent on the intended rejection of operational language, is it not?Feb 12, 2019, 5:08 PMCurt Doolittle????Feb 12, 2019, 6:17 PMZach QuarryThe legal system is a different way to apply violence. Before applying physical violence.Feb 12, 2019, 6:17 PMConnor CreeganAm I misunderstanding how you define and identify purposeful deception?Feb 12, 2019, 6:24 PMCurt DoolittleI have no idea because I don’t know what you’re implying.

Given:

Any statement passes the tests of:

categorically consistent (identity)

Internally consistent (Logically consistent)

externally correspondent (empirically consistent)

existentially consistent (operationally stated)

scope consistent (limits and full accounting)

rational (subjectively consistent – incentives )

reciprocal (reciprocally subjectively consistent – exchanges)

with these warranties of due diligence,

within the limits of possible restitution,

any display word or deed is free of imposition of costs,

and therefore free of retaliation.

Therefore it is truthful and moral.

We can never know if a statement is true (critical naturalism). We can only know that we have exhausted due diligence sufficient for the demand for due diligence given the promise, claim, testimony we are making.

This is Propertarian Natural Law’s epistemology: “Testimonialism’, or what some call ‘Critical Naturalism’.Feb 12, 2019, 6:47 PMTHE TWO OBJECTIONS

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52156672_10156980116932264_6547672682064773120_o_10156980116922264.jpg UM YOU ARE WELCOME TO THE MEMBERS OF “THE STUPID PARTY”Charles M TriplettI though John Mark’s YouTube videos were really good. How does she feel he’s a liability? He articulates his position excellently.Feb 11, 2019, 6:29 PMCurt DoolittleI think it’s just GSRRM ploy and claiming knowledge she does not have. In other words, appeal to false authority, or false evidence, under cover of GSRRM.Feb 11, 2019, 6:42 PMGreg HamiltonLol. Random thot says therefore cut him loose he’s a liability !Feb 11, 2019, 6:45 PMZach QuarryYeah, nah! I’m sold on what would pretty much stop us from fighting the left wing for eternity. One fight to rule them all, and in the darkness separate and punish them. Oof! Added alittle more to it.Feb 11, 2019, 7:06 PMDylan KnowlesYour vibe attracts your tribeFeb 11, 2019, 7:35 PMEdmund BlackadderHow does she arrive at the idea John Mark is a liability?Feb 11, 2019, 7:52 PMAlex RobinsonI’m entirely ignorant of the context of your conversation Curt, but could you further elaborate what you mean by the universalist for women and tribe for men comment?Feb 11, 2019, 7:58 PMCurt Doolittlereproductive strategies of female and male are different and are in competition. Which is something that’s been in the lit forever. Not a surprise. The fact that our cog biases reflect this is something the postmoderns rallied against, but cog sci has demonstrated otherwise. People are like any other domesticated animal. But because we can speak, and negotiate, we have consciousness. But our consiousness is even more influenced by our genes (biology) than the other way ’round.Feb 11, 2019, 8:33 PMCurt Doolittlein other words we do not so much know what we are doing as know what we are doing in the context of our reproductive strategy.Feb 11, 2019, 8:38 PMJarrod MarmaHis spread is attracting criticism and accusations that he (or Curt himself) is a fed. I personally will blame his anonymity as a large source of the problem because John Mark I know you might have a separate life that you don’t want entangled but a lot of hypocrisy can be seen in demanding truth while wearing a disguise. I have respect for what you’re doing and I understand possible lines of reasoning, but it didn’t seem like Curt addressed that unheard question that is possibly causing a good deal of hesitance among followers. If we’re going to demand honesty shouldn’t we lead with it?

(I have real pictures of me on my account if you want to point at my profile picture too)Feb 11, 2019, 9:12 PMCurt Doolittleit is of an asset value for john to be an achetype rather than an individual. As an archetype you can criticize his ideas or not. As an individual you can engage in ad homs. And as far as I know all I attribute this line of argument to, is GSSRM against not being able to use ad homs for the purpose of GSSRM rather than argument – which is what stupid people do. It’s all they can do.Feb 11, 2019, 9:26 PMAlex RobinsonYou’re saying that because of the way our reproductive organs work, men prefer small communities where women prefer large ones? I hope you understand if that isn’t accurate, you were vague lol.Feb 11, 2019, 9:31 PMCurt DoolittleJohn simply finds the utility of riffing off the “Anonymous” branding valuable. He will tell you otherwise but that’s the reason.Feb 11, 2019, 9:50 PMCurt DoolittleThe Anonymous and V for Vendetta brands are exeptional to riff off of.Feb 11, 2019, 9:51 PMJarrod MarmaAs long as the profits aren’t going to Warner Bros. 🤣Feb 11, 2019, 9:54 PMCurt DoolittleI actually have no idea who he is but I”m betting on a very small graphic arts firm, or web development company in the midwest or south. At least that’s my read.Feb 11, 2019, 9:54 PMEdmund BlackadderOr DisneyFeb 11, 2019, 9:55 PMCurt Doolittleoh don’t tell me stuff like that. it makes me cringe.Feb 11, 2019, 9:55 PMCurt Doolittle( just trying to be economical to keep up with the load tonight…. men think and work in hierarchical packs and women tend to work in a herd with herd morality (no one left behind) simple pseudoscientific version is r/k selection. )Feb 11, 2019, 10:13 PMAlex RobinsonCurt Doolittle gotcha, I see your point now. I’m very interested in going deeper but I can wait the topic to come up.Feb 11, 2019, 10:36 PMChristian KalafutThe Roman Empire was the most universalist entity in the ancient world and yet you praise it?Feb 12, 2019, 11:33 AMCurt DoolittleIt wasn’t universalist. It was a market for religions as long as they recognized the atuority of rome. They integrated sects the way english integrates words.Feb 12, 2019, 12:40 PMCurt DoolittleRome was a commercial empire, not a despotic or religious.Feb 12, 2019, 12:48 PMUM YOU ARE WELCOME TO THE MEMBERS OF “THE STUPID PARTY”