YES PSYCHOLOGY IS PLAGUED BY PSEUDOSCIENCE AND YES THE REPLICATION CRISIS DESTROYED ITS CREDIBILITY
—“Paper finds evidence that the reproducibility crisis may already have damaged the trust in psychological science and the perception of its value among lay people beyond repair. https://osf.io/4ukq5 “— Rolf Degen
It has in both Psych. and Soc. Cog-Sci Won. Better model is neural networks, neural economy, the Homunculus, hemispheric competition (predatory prey), gender differences, reward systems, division of labor, and that all human behavior is expressible as acquisition using economics.
In other words, if you can’t explain human behavior in economic language you’re projecting judgements (biases) to conformity on what is a division of perception, cognition, memory, advocacy, and labor.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52896753_10157019016252264_254172488085274624_o_10157019016237264.jpg See?Jarrod MarmaBut Martin said biological testing on subgroups is immoral. SAD!Feb 28, 2019, 7:03 PMPattern Principle’Eco-‘ the prefix of both ecology and economics is not by mistake. Economy is ecology, as ecology is economy. The etymological definition of eco is ‘house’ – so Propertarians are merely getting our house in order, so to speak.Feb 28, 2019, 7:04 PMOliver CrokeFrank Sandberg wrote a paper on this.Feb 28, 2019, 8:37 PMCurt Doolittleon what?Feb 28, 2019, 8:47 PMOliver CrokeHe wrote about the principle of innate self healing/organisation of human bodies and explained the nature of the principle with reference to Austrian economics if I remember it correctly (was a few years ago).Feb 28, 2019, 8:50 PMMartin ŠtěpánJarrod Marma I don’t make moral statements. I’ve said you wouldn’t get away with it because controlled breeding and keeping for scientific purposes is something that is not looked kindly upon when done to humans.Mar 1, 2019, 12:59 AMMartin ŠtěpánReplication, variation, markets (competition, selection, transaction) and evolution in everything.Mar 1, 2019, 4:24 AMDan WarrenAre we cleaning our rooms?Mar 1, 2019, 6:59 AMMoritz BierlingCleaning every room (discipline) until the entire house (system of systems) is in order.Mar 1, 2019, 9:00 AMJarrod MarmaWhat does that mean entirely? CRISPR experiments seem to be popping up regularly in the news. The entire reason we have cold weather training information is due to human experimentation. I’m sure surgical experience originated similarly from vivisections. “Not looked kindly upon” is a vague platitude.Mar 1, 2019, 9:23 AMSee?
—“Psychology, education, health professions, social work… I can’t help but notice that those fields offer positions outside the market (where consumers are not payers). We’re taxing men so that we can subsidise jobs to women. Paying for our own destruction.”—Vengefül Bobmoran
—“Adding to your last line a bit: Paying them to rob us and give food, clothing and shelter to biological parasites.”—Andrew Gribble
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52702681_10157018306777264_2367313453032407040_n_10157018306772264.jpg —“Proprietarianism-You can have my donut if I can have yours and no one else gets harmed in the process”–Greg Grzywacz
He forgot the last bit.
—…. Otherwise, either you don’t get my donut, and if you even try, I’m going to end you and eat both our donuts.”–CurtDNicholas Christopher RichardWhat’s the propertarian donut ethic?Feb 28, 2019, 11:50 AMFrancesco PrincipiPrincipi I prefer womenFeb 28, 2019, 11:51 AMZach MattoNicholas Christopher Richard Incremental suppression of people eating more donuts than they’ve earned = the west…?Feb 28, 2019, 12:04 PMMicah PezdirtzLocke, Nietzsche and heraclitusFeb 28, 2019, 12:25 PMDaniel OgburnMarx description/analogy is shockingly wrong.
Some of the others are shaky at best.Feb 28, 2019, 12:27 PMDaniel OgburnAlso,
Freud — the donut is a symbol of man’s sexual desire.
Jung — the shape of the donut
Is a result your childhood
templates.
Ogburn — If you’re fat, don’t eat the
donut.Feb 28, 2019, 12:30 PMDaniel OgburnAlso Ogburn — the donut is anything homeomorphic to s1 x s1Feb 28, 2019, 12:31 PMDaniel OgburnDavin Eastley — the donut reminds me of my sisters.Feb 28, 2019, 12:32 PMDavin Eastleyit’s a teacupFeb 28, 2019, 12:32 PMCurt DoolittleMarx: the classes are at war instead of tripartite, rather than the semites and the aryan are at war, and the semites can’t develop morals and ethics of high trust commons.Feb 28, 2019, 12:38 PMEric BlankenburgThere is something to be said for the directness and simplicity of Locke. ;)Feb 28, 2019, 12:43 PMDavin EastleyPrevent the theft of donuts from the commons.Feb 28, 2019, 12:49 PMDavin EastleyProtect the donut commons from parasitism.Feb 28, 2019, 12:49 PMThorsten NorgateBill & Ted version – All we are is doughnuts in the wind, Dude.Feb 28, 2019, 12:50 PMShannon Constantine Logandonut in totoFeb 28, 2019, 1:29 PMJWarren Prescottfreud was rightFeb 28, 2019, 1:37 PMGreg GrzywaczProprietarianism-You can have my donut if I can have yours and no one else gets harmed in the processFeb 28, 2019, 2:05 PMCurt DoolittlepricelessFeb 28, 2019, 2:07 PMCurt Doolittleadded to op.Feb 28, 2019, 2:08 PMMichael BurkeDerrida: donut, eclair, muffin? What the difference?Feb 28, 2019, 2:19 PMPiero ThymiopoulosWithout a means of power to obtain the donut, one simply can’t obtain it.Feb 28, 2019, 9:44 PMAdrian Folkersamlet’s get this (glazed) bread kingsMar 1, 2019, 3:11 PMBill JoslinReciprocity is shaped like DonutMar 1, 2019, 4:53 PMRob RandallStealing this picture.Mar 1, 2019, 5:14 PMGünther Shroomachersounds weird 😀
edit: let’s make donut together and make sure no one else gets harmed in the processMar 1, 2019, 9:44 PMEric RushNeeds some Lord BerkeleyMar 3, 2019, 5:55 PM—“Proprietarianism-You can have my donut if I can have yours and no one else gets harmed in the process”–Greg Grzywacz
He forgot the last bit.
—…. Otherwise, either you don’t get my donut, and if you even try, I’m going to end you and eat both our donuts.”–CurtD
