Form: Quote Commentary

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53557098_10157022546302264_202861774

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53557098_10157022546302264_2028617743728640000_n_10157022546297264.jpg FAKE HATE CRIMES LIST.

    LINK: http://FakeHateCrimes.OrgRafael AureliusNovember 2016 showed record hate crime hoaxes.

    Can we buy some call options set to expire in December of 2020?Mar 2, 2019, 5:13 PMFAKE HATE CRIMES LIST.

    LINK: http://FakeHateCrimes.Org/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 12:21:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53316612_10157022496292264_852280925

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53316612_10157022496292264_8522809252505452544_n_10157022496287264.jpg It Isn’t Rare.JWarren PrescottNo more lies…. For me, this is the biggest attraction to Propertarianism.Mar 2, 2019, 12:02 PMCurt Doolittleeach of these would be criminally prosecutable and we would enjoy it.Mar 2, 2019, 12:02 PMRafael AureliusFakehatecrimes.orgMar 2, 2019, 12:05 PMCurt Doolittleit’s blocked by fb I think.Mar 2, 2019, 12:05 PMWilliam L. BengeRacketeers need the racks.Mar 2, 2019, 12:08 PMWilliam L. BengeUnleash Libel law.Mar 2, 2019, 12:10 PMRafael AureliusIt’s not blocked, click it. The link preview is just messed up. That website is a treasure trove.Mar 2, 2019, 12:12 PMErik LukovskyDisgracefulMar 2, 2019, 12:25 PMWayne WaltonTribal Exodus Government Judges rule harshly against the False Accusers. Those who falsely witness capital crimes are stoned.Mar 2, 2019, 12:29 PMWayne WaltonTribal Exodus Government Judges rule harshly against the False Accusers. Those who falsely witness capital crimes are stoned.Mar 2, 2019, 12:29 PMWayne WaltonCurt Doolittle Tribal Exodus Government Judges rule harshly against the False Accusers. Those who falsely witness capital crimes are stoned.Mar 2, 2019, 12:30 PMJWarren PrescottWayne Walton – sometimes witch doctors get results.Mar 2, 2019, 12:46 PMTim Beckley-SpillaneDemand is greater than supply.Mar 2, 2019, 12:52 PMWayne WaltonJWarren Prescott Pharaoh thought he was GOD too. Defining good and evil. That’s like fighting gravityMar 2, 2019, 1:04 PMMartin ŠtěpánIt’s incentivized, same as false rape accusations. MRAs have a made a similar effort: http://register-her.netMar 2, 2019, 3:52 PMIt Isn’t Rare.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 11:59:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53513205_10157022435202264_355288347

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53513205_10157022435202264_3552883477957312512_o_10157022435187264.jpg Serg GioBalls + Brains make allMar 3, 2019, 6:07 AMJameson Blackwell>influence

    no one knows who you are.

    >strategy

    ramming telephone poles and shooting transformers is not a strategy. 200 mile wide hurricanes crush the electrical grid of Florida every year and the lights are back on in a few days. As of yet, no separatist militias have formed from the lack of electricity.Mar 3, 2019, 9:14 AMCurt DoolittleHurricane’s don’t shoot first responders, or linemen, or warn first responders and linemen that they’ll be shot. Hurricanes in one region draw resources from other regions. Enough hurricanes and that won’t happen.Mar 3, 2019, 12:03 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 11:29:00 UTC

  • Frederick, IMO (selfishly on my part ) one of your best papers – success and fai

    https://www.academia.edu/…/Are_Institutions_Created_by_Coll…Danny Frederick,

    IMO (selfishly on my part ) one of your best papers – success and failure of institutions being near and dear to my heart.

    RE: https://www.academia.edu/38466999/Are_Institutions_Created_by_Collective_Acceptance?

    CONTEXT QUESTION

    0. Could be a little more ‘bold’ in the abstract, because the question you are trying to answer is relevant to the urgent present condition – abstract under rates the argument? My understanding is that you consistently address the arguments of other authors in proper academic fashion, but do you tie your work back to general theory, or general arguments? Or do you intend your audience to interpret each paper in a vacuum rather than as a collection of your works in defense or advocacy of a theory?

    ANSWERED QUESTION

    1. Attributing greater agency to people than they have? (not sure if this is answered)

    2. Do institutions(producers) rules (products) and actions (services) fulfill a market demand or fail to fulfill a market demand? (answered)

    3. Is the failure to fulfill a market demand due to (a) contrary to demand, (b) limiting demand, (c) assisting demand? (answered)

    UNANSWERED QUESTION

    5. Do you mean to say that status is assigned or that institutions can provide a vehicle for signaling by virtue of either the coercive power delivered to their members or success at competing within the limits of those coercive powers?

    6. Is the market demand determined by Moral Intuitions (group strategies), Ethical Intuitions (Organizational Strategies), or Generational, or Gender intuitions (strategies)?

    7. Are the Neocon, Marxist, Libertarian, Postmodern, Feminist movements made possible by temporary economic windfalls from hydrocarbons, the industrial and technological revolutions lasting only until asymmetry of underclasses and technology is ameliorated by regression to the mean? And is that the underlying conflict?

    8. Are we not only discovering that this luxury makes females and males diverge in demonstration of genetic interests (rather than converge as the left anticipated), but that groups within empires and nation states are seeking expression of genetic interests generating unresolvable conflict of interest?

    9. What equilibrium must be established to move in any given direction from existing intellectual, narrative, economic, political, social, and familial orders?

    10. Is there any value of scale, or (as in the ancient world) do we regress to the mean and decline slowly in order to preserve what we perceive as benefits of institutional and political scale?

    thanks.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 10:36:00 UTC

  • Danny, IMO (selfishly on my part ) one of your best papers – success and failure

    Danny,

    IMO (selfishly on my part ) one of your best papers – success and failure of institutions being near and dear to my heart.

    RE: https://www.academia.edu/38466999/Are_Institutions_Created_by_Collective_Acceptance?

    CONTEXT QUESTION

    0. Could be a little more ‘bold’ in the abstract, because the question you are trying to answer is relevant to the urgent present condition – abstract under rates the argument? My understanding is that you consistently address the arguments of other authors in proper academic fashion, but do you tie your work back to general theory, or general arguments? Or do you intend your audience to interpret each paper in a vacuum rather than as a collection of your works in defense or advocacy of a theory?

    ANSWERED QUESTION

    1. Attributing greater agency to people than they have? (not sure if this is answered)

    2. Do institutions(producers) rules (products) and actions (services) fulfill a market demand or fail to fulfill a market demand? (answered)

    3. Is the failure to fulfill a market demand due to (a) contrary to demand, (b) limiting demand, (c) assisting demand? (answered)

    UNANSWERED QUESTION

    5. Do you mean to say that status is assigned or that institutions can provide a vehicle for signaling by virtue of either the coercive power delivered to their members or success at competing within the limits of those coercive powers?

    6. Is the market demand determined by Moral Intuitions (group strategies), Ethical Intuitions (Organizational Strategies), or Generational, or Gender intuitions (strategies)?

    7. Are the Neocon, Marxist, Libertarian, Postmodern, Feminist movements made possible by temporary economic windfalls from hydrocarbons, the industrial and technological revolutions lasting only until asymmetry of underclasses and technology is ameliorated by regression to the mean? And is that the underlying conflict?

    8. Are we not only discovering that this luxury makes females and males diverge in demonstration of genetic interests (rather than converge as the left anticipated), but that groups within empires and nation states are seeking expression of genetic interests generating unresolvable conflict of interest?

    9. What equilibrium must be established to move in any given direction from existing intellectual, narrative, economic, political, social, and familial orders?

    10. Is there any value of scale, or (as in the ancient world) do we regress to the mean and decline slowly in order to preserve what we perceive as benefits of institutional and political scale?

    thanks.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 09:19:00 UTC

  • “Markets in everything is not how we want it to be. Markets in everything is how

    —“Markets in everything is not how we want it to be. Markets in everything is how we already are without externals forcing to be behave otherwise.”—Stephen Thomas


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 14:10:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101484896214749184

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53084598_10157020137832264_263703139

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53084598_10157020137832264_2637031399151894528_o_10157020137827264.jpg Via @[525087895:2048:James Santagata]

    (humor)James SantagataIt was Darren O’Connor. 😂Mar 1, 2019, 9:23 AMDarren O’ConnorOh, I can’t take credit for it…just a humble sharer.Mar 1, 2019, 9:40 AMJames SantagataOne of the best ones this year!Mar 1, 2019, 10:05 AMMartin ŠtěpánHigh mutational load. People ugly on the outside are likely to be ugly on the inside too, despite everything we’re being told. It’s actually the whole reason we perceive them as ugly in the first place.Mar 1, 2019, 10:18 AMMark Di RussoLiterally a Roman neckbeard. I’d not be surprised if he shared their sexual proclivities too.. 😏Mar 1, 2019, 10:35 AMJB BurnsNero looks like hes part of the Odoyle family in Billy MadisonMar 1, 2019, 10:52 AMAlain DwightGuy who ordered Seneca to kill himself would be a neck beard.Mar 1, 2019, 12:37 PMNathan McLaughlinJames LynchMar 1, 2019, 1:54 PMPatrick SmythMark Di Russo pretty sure he did…Mar 1, 2019, 2:38 PMNick HeywoodBoth have been accused of Satan 🙂

    Will the real Satan, please stand up?!?!Mar 1, 2019, 5:40 PMChristian WarwickVery Cro-magnon features.Mar 1, 2019, 6:19 PMBrendan McGlynnJeff SevercoolMar 1, 2019, 6:50 PMBen FrayleGreatest Artistic Genius in Human History. World champion poet, dramatist, musician, wrestler, chariot racer. … everything he did he was the best. Sort of like the Howard Hughes of Ancient Rome.Mar 1, 2019, 7:27 PMMarko KlaicFed trying to be funnyMar 4, 2019, 5:32 AMVia James Santagata

    (humor)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:23:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53292243_10157020122247264_150357994

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53292243_10157020122247264_1503579947665457152_n_10157020122242264.jpg SCIENCE OF BEER GOGGLES

    (I’m only guilty once.)Jaromír MiškovskýBag over head now Appstore iBag™.Mar 1, 2019, 10:09 AMEric Blankenburghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_a3oY1ND_8Mar 1, 2019, 11:11 AMSCIENCE OF BEER GOGGLES

    (I’m only guilty once.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:12:00 UTC

  • “Markets in everything is not how we want it to be. Markets in everything is how

    —“Markets in everything is not how we want it to be. Markets in everything is how we already are without externals forcing to be behave otherwise.”—Stephen Thomas


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:10:00 UTC

  • ECONOMICS IS THE STUDY OF PEOPLE by Stephen Thomas (mutliple quotables in this o

    ECONOMICS IS THE STUDY OF PEOPLE

    by Stephen Thomas

    (mutliple quotables in this one)

    Economics is not really the study of money or financial systems. It’s the study of people and groups and the behaviors of each/both.

    The more I have studied it. The more I realize. I am not learning about anything other than people. The People are the market.

    Markets in everything is not how we want it to be. Markets in everything is how we already are without externals forcing to be behave otherwise.

    Need(desire) > Incentive(demand) > Motivation > Action > Result(Failure/Success) > Need(desire)

    This seems to be the cycle of nearly all human actions.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:09:00 UTC