(FB 1549825521 Timestamp) THE VALUE OF FREE ADVERTISING —“I’m both astounded and flattered that @curtdoolittle has elected to devote so much time to fighting avatars in the comment sections of my videos. For someone who prefers not to interact with others or “debate idiots” (his words), his conduct is extremely curious.”—Josh Neal Putting aside your attempt to find security, status, self image, and the illusion of agency, by hiding behind paranoia rather than evidence, reason, and argument: It is the most effective recruiting tool we have found. The people with whom we argue are immaterial. It’s the people that ‘sense something right’ in our arguments that we seek to attract by taking advantage of the attention (advertising) you create by your attempted criticism. We don’t want populists. We want men who will fight, or men who will win arguments. Those who are fearful lack the agency to participate. I am an elitist on the behalf of our people. I do not require their approval to work in their interests. Eventually you will discover, as all others do, that all attempts to engage in GSRRM (feminine argument) merely provide us with advertising space by which to compare your feminine(feels) vs our masculine(reals) arguments. The only other substantial non-neocon intellectual on the right is Buchanan. Everyone else is an apologist for classical liberalism. No one else has a solution or method of bringing it about. Conservatism is not an intellectual movement. It is a pre rational, sentimental and traditional one. AND I WILL CHANGE THAT FOREVER. The logic, science, and history of our people in rational prose. The Group Evolutionary Strategy of the European Peoples: Superior rates of evolution through Heroism and Innovation, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, The natural law, and markets in every aspect of life. We are not the first – we need not be. We need only be the fastest – and we always have been. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
Form: Quote Commentary
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549818692 Timestamp) WOMEN HAVE INTRINSIC VALUE, MEN HAVE POTENTIAL VALUE by Nicholas Christopher Richard This is why women can make money hand over fist filming themselves simply existing. See for reference: premium snapchats and female twitch streamers. I was trying to explain this to a female friend last year, that short of wearing a burka or something there is nothing they can do to avert the ‘male gaze.’ Even if she’s average (and I mean historically average, not “170 lbs is the current average for American women” average) she will always get attention from men. The app TikTok is a great example of this. There are videos of women literally just talking into the camera that have thousands and thousands of likes. Even something as simple as running her hand through her hair or shifting her weight a certain way does something for me. I can’t help it. Being a nominally attractive woman is the closest thing there is to mind control.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549818692 Timestamp) WOMEN HAVE INTRINSIC VALUE, MEN HAVE POTENTIAL VALUE by Nicholas Christopher Richard This is why women can make money hand over fist filming themselves simply existing. See for reference: premium snapchats and female twitch streamers. I was trying to explain this to a female friend last year, that short of wearing a burka or something there is nothing they can do to avert the ‘male gaze.’ Even if she’s average (and I mean historically average, not “170 lbs is the current average for American women” average) she will always get attention from men. The app TikTok is a great example of this. There are videos of women literally just talking into the camera that have thousands and thousands of likes. Even something as simple as running her hand through her hair or shifting her weight a certain way does something for me. I can’t help it. Being a nominally attractive woman is the closest thing there is to mind control.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549827459 Timestamp) DEBATE IS ABOUT THE AUDIENCE by Steven Kolpek —“It is the most effective recruiting tool we have found. The people with whom we argue are immaterial. It’s the people that ‘sense something right’ in our arguments that we seek to attract by taking advantage of the attention (advertising) you create by your attempted criticism.”—CD Public debate is less about convincing the opponent, and more about attracting and teaching the audience. The process is super fun when you get someone who bites the bait and runs through the GSRM tactics like clockwork so you end up making them look silly while present Truths for viewers to munch on.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549827459 Timestamp) DEBATE IS ABOUT THE AUDIENCE by Steven Kolpek —“It is the most effective recruiting tool we have found. The people with whom we argue are immaterial. It’s the people that ‘sense something right’ in our arguments that we seek to attract by taking advantage of the attention (advertising) you create by your attempted criticism.”—CD Public debate is less about convincing the opponent, and more about attracting and teaching the audience. The process is super fun when you get someone who bites the bait and runs through the GSRM tactics like clockwork so you end up making them look silly while present Truths for viewers to munch on.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1549998892 Timestamp) NEW CONTRIBUTION TO PROPERTARIANISM by @Michelle Catlin, on Medium A fuller, better, treatment of the subject. Well written. This is Canon. Can’t compliment enough. https://medium.com/@CatlinNyaa/a-propertarian-moral-foundations-theory-a70e440b9b13?fbclid=IwAR0rRaHYAf6JKt16ClFZK1POGrIkTAaz4-uqrJ4-j6adT9Scpjd08sLU_ow
References ( Original P version: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2014/09/28/moral-foundations-as-property-rights/ )
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1549971692 Timestamp) MORE ON THE REPLICATION CRISIS IN PSYCHOLOGY (PSEUDOSCIENCE) What if the reason we have not developed a framework, and why psychology cannot convert to a science, is because we may like what we find? I’ve been working on the problem as a byproduct of my work (method) and I think it’s relatively simple and solid. We just won’t like it. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0522-1 ==== by Valerio Caprario (via james santagata) Incredibly deep paper: – the replicability crisis in psychology is not only driven by methodological and statistical shortcomings – it’s mainly driven by a lack of theoretical frameworks – Psychology needs to be turned into a formal science Abstract (Gated) The replication crisis facing the psychological sciences is widely regarded as rooted in methodological or statistical shortcomings. We argue that a large part of the problem is the lack of a cumulative theoretical framework or frameworks. Without an overarching theoretical framework that generates hypotheses across diverse domains, empirical programs spawn and grow from personal intuitions and culturally biased folk theories. By providing ways to develop clear predictions, including through the use of formal modelling, theoretical frameworks set expectations that determine whether a new finding is confirmatory, nicely integrating with existing lines of research, or surprising, and therefore requiring further replication and scrutiny. Such frameworks also prioritize certain research foci, motivate the use diverse empirical approaches and, often, provide a natural means to integrate across the sciences. Thus, overarching theoretical frameworks pave the way toward a more general theory of human behaviour. We illustrate one such a theoretical framework: dual inheritance theory.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1549971692 Timestamp) MORE ON THE REPLICATION CRISIS IN PSYCHOLOGY (PSEUDOSCIENCE) What if the reason we have not developed a framework, and why psychology cannot convert to a science, is because we may like what we find? I’ve been working on the problem as a byproduct of my work (method) and I think it’s relatively simple and solid. We just won’t like it. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0522-1 ==== by Valerio Caprario (via james santagata) Incredibly deep paper: – the replicability crisis in psychology is not only driven by methodological and statistical shortcomings – it’s mainly driven by a lack of theoretical frameworks – Psychology needs to be turned into a formal science Abstract (Gated) The replication crisis facing the psychological sciences is widely regarded as rooted in methodological or statistical shortcomings. We argue that a large part of the problem is the lack of a cumulative theoretical framework or frameworks. Without an overarching theoretical framework that generates hypotheses across diverse domains, empirical programs spawn and grow from personal intuitions and culturally biased folk theories. By providing ways to develop clear predictions, including through the use of formal modelling, theoretical frameworks set expectations that determine whether a new finding is confirmatory, nicely integrating with existing lines of research, or surprising, and therefore requiring further replication and scrutiny. Such frameworks also prioritize certain research foci, motivate the use diverse empirical approaches and, often, provide a natural means to integrate across the sciences. Thus, overarching theoretical frameworks pave the way toward a more general theory of human behaviour. We illustrate one such a theoretical framework: dual inheritance theory.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1549998892 Timestamp) NEW CONTRIBUTION TO PROPERTARIANISM by @Michelle Catlin, on Medium A fuller, better, treatment of the subject. Well written. This is Canon. Can’t compliment enough. https://medium.com/@CatlinNyaa/a-propertarian-moral-foundations-theory-a70e440b9b13?fbclid=IwAR0rRaHYAf6JKt16ClFZK1POGrIkTAaz4-uqrJ4-j6adT9Scpjd08sLU_ow
References ( Original P version: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2014/09/28/moral-foundations-as-property-rights/ )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550020199 Timestamp) —“Arguments are only for convincing your friends to help you make a bigger skull pile.”—Dan Warren