Form: Quote Commentary

  • RT @Outsideness: The actual state of sociology

    RT @Outsideness: The actual state of sociology. https://www.unz.com/isteve/sociologist-whiteness-is-both-imaginary-and-demands-extermination/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 17:29:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234893688238727169

  • RT @Steve_Sailer: Unlike in the days of barbaric nomads, we now have territorial

    RT @Steve_Sailer: Unlike in the days of barbaric nomads, we now have territorial states with internationally recognized borders, countries…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 17:29:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234893658090070017

  • RT @Steve_Sailer: So, @RichardDawkins, the invasion of Britain 4500 years ago by

    RT @Steve_Sailer: So, @RichardDawkins, the invasion of Britain 4500 years ago by the Beaker culture, which led to the genocide of 90% of th…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 17:29:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234893640260079617

  • INALIENABLE HUMAN RIGHTS ONLY EXIST IF WE PROVIDE THEM TO OURSELVES.

    By Martin Štěpán

    —“Each person has inherent worth, inalienable human rights, and value, but we must not let political correctness dictate reality.”— a friend

    Not quite. Inherent worth is Platonism. Your value, just like value of anything else, is subjective and not necessarily positive. The only way to ensure that our value to others isn’t negative is limiting our display, word and deed to reciprocity. Inalienable human rights only exist if we provide them to ourselves.

  • INALIENABLE HUMAN RIGHTS ONLY EXIST IF WE PROVIDE THEM TO OURSELVES.

    By Martin Štěpán

    —“Each person has inherent worth, inalienable human rights, and value, but we must not let political correctness dictate reality.”— a friend

    Not quite. Inherent worth is Platonism. Your value, just like value of anything else, is subjective and not necessarily positive. The only way to ensure that our value to others isn’t negative is limiting our display, word and deed to reciprocity. Inalienable human rights only exist if we provide them to ourselves.

  • ZEIHAN ON TRUMP AND OUR CONDITION

    ZEIHAN ON TRUMP AND OUR CONDITION

    —“The Beauty, tragedy and irony of Donald Trump – is that he’s right.”—Peter Zeihan

    OTHER QUOTES We don’t need a global trade system, we don’t need and can’t lead, as a global hegemon. You have to be able to provide global maritime security. If the Americans never add another Supercarrier, the rest of the world won’t catch up until 2240. You have to have consumption. If people don’t buy the exports, you can’t do anything. The USA has a consumption based system. (He’s not answering how that’s no longer necessary – it’s what they consume given the demographics. we could consume CONQUEST if we wanted to.) We have milennials (omfg) well at least they can pay taxes – but they are all alone in the night. The first world is now a retirement community. the financialization and redistribution caused a dysgenic population crash i our civilization. But we can’t maintain it all – we haven’t got the population and QUALITY of population to do maintain superpower status. Mexicans are the market – a partner. Canada isn’t a partner it’s a dependent. There is nothing canada can do other than product dumping. Canada is a competitor. You can’t run a first world economy without a work force – you have to automate. Japan did it. So you automate internally ship products and labor externally. and prevent the lower class problem. — end — We have to be the empire AND automate. White government and military . White middle and working class. not-so-white labor and service. Eugneic reproduction. Automation.

  • ZEIHAN ON TRUMP AND OUR CONDITION

    ZEIHAN ON TRUMP AND OUR CONDITION

    —“The Beauty, tragedy and irony of Donald Trump – is that he’s right.”—Peter Zeihan

    OTHER QUOTES We don’t need a global trade system, we don’t need and can’t lead, as a global hegemon. You have to be able to provide global maritime security. If the Americans never add another Supercarrier, the rest of the world won’t catch up until 2240. You have to have consumption. If people don’t buy the exports, you can’t do anything. The USA has a consumption based system. (He’s not answering how that’s no longer necessary – it’s what they consume given the demographics. we could consume CONQUEST if we wanted to.) We have milennials (omfg) well at least they can pay taxes – but they are all alone in the night. The first world is now a retirement community. the financialization and redistribution caused a dysgenic population crash i our civilization. But we can’t maintain it all – we haven’t got the population and QUALITY of population to do maintain superpower status. Mexicans are the market – a partner. Canada isn’t a partner it’s a dependent. There is nothing canada can do other than product dumping. Canada is a competitor. You can’t run a first world economy without a work force – you have to automate. Japan did it. So you automate internally ship products and labor externally. and prevent the lower class problem. — end — We have to be the empire AND automate. White government and military . White middle and working class. not-so-white labor and service. Eugneic reproduction. Automation.

  • An ex Muslim Woman’s Take on P and Women. (Very Smart)

    Maria gives me perhaps the most important answer I was looking for: as Adam has suggested, if we re-write Aristotle in P, we give humanity across the spectrum what they are looking for. This was an important insight that I kept on the back burner, but now must move to the front.

    by Maria Al Masani Makienko As a Muslim woman, I have to make a comment about ex Muslim women. My issue is when they leave the faith, they cut their hair short, become rad feminists, sleep with every man they can, then they get into their 30s and want to settle down and men are not interested. My issue with ex Muslim men is they enable this behavior, encourage it, but don’t marry them. I think religion is an excellent tool to manage women and prevent them from eating each other and destroying their marriage marketplace value and policing weak beta males who put them on a pedestal and become their slaves when they know better. Female cognition is highly emotional, made to care for infants – something autistic women such as myself are terrible at. Female cognitives and their emotion-based thinking must be managed not to destroy themselves and society. I think for male cognitive with an IQ 115 and above that are not slaves to women, P is excellent. In a way, P creates a cognitive aristocracy and a traditional masculine religion is the only effective tool for cognitive commoner management.The utility of religion is domesticating the slaves of emotion-based thinking. The aristocracy should use philosophy, logic, and reason for decision making. In leading Orthodox, Catholic and Muslim seminaries, Aristotle is studied a lot – as my husband said, why can’t that be updated with P?

    Curt: They Can be (updated with P).

    They, as in ex Muslim women, the men who enable them? As for they can be… my favorite response is Dr Johanthan Haidt on decay. The issue with 6 pronged conservative values is they prevent decay. But every generation of secular women is more degenerate than the next and eats each other. I am a sufi, a moderate who used to go after religious conservatives and moved to Canada .. but then in 15 years I saw the decay of each subsequent generation. Women from when I came to Canada are Audrey Hepburn compared to the blue and green hair tattooed feminist monsters coming out of the schools. And then at 30, they are tired and spent. And the religious immigrant girls who don’t integrate from a patriarchal faith have their pick of men here. If the woman has male cognition, and is an ex Muslim autist, she would agree with me about what happens to female cognitive ex Muslim women over time. Female cognition is a problem: if you give them power they ruin everything! And the way you control them is not the way you think for yourself. When one is motivated by logic and reason, they first go to Aristotle for their thinking, Marcus Aurellius … but its so nice to have something modern and even more relevant like P. P for the aristocracy – a traditional religion for the underclass

    Smart. Very smart. WOMEN Agreed, but In our culture we must state this differently: “We have had centuries to develop many institutional means of controlling men’s bad behavior when they have gained social, economic, and political freedom, but we have not had time to create institutions to control women’s bad behavior when they have social economic and political freedom – and women, just like men, clearly have many bad behaviors we need institutions to control.” ARISTOCRACY: Agreed .. But in our culture, where the majority is in the middle, not the bottom, we use tri-partism and tri-functionalism, so we must have three: “Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.” WORK: I have so many projects I would like to finish: 1) to rewrite all of Aristotle in propertarian prose. 2) to write a tripartite theology for western peoples 3) to try write one book that tries to reform christianity, islam, judaism, buddhism – if not hinduism (i don’t think I can understand it) so that they are rational as well as spiritual, but not in conflict with the natural law. I will not live long enough to do all these things. But I’ll do the best I can. 😉

  • An ex Muslim Woman’s Take on P and Women. (Very Smart)

    Maria gives me perhaps the most important answer I was looking for: as Adam has suggested, if we re-write Aristotle in P, we give humanity across the spectrum what they are looking for. This was an important insight that I kept on the back burner, but now must move to the front.

    by Maria Al Masani Makienko As a Muslim woman, I have to make a comment about ex Muslim women. My issue is when they leave the faith, they cut their hair short, become rad feminists, sleep with every man they can, then they get into their 30s and want to settle down and men are not interested. My issue with ex Muslim men is they enable this behavior, encourage it, but don’t marry them. I think religion is an excellent tool to manage women and prevent them from eating each other and destroying their marriage marketplace value and policing weak beta males who put them on a pedestal and become their slaves when they know better. Female cognition is highly emotional, made to care for infants – something autistic women such as myself are terrible at. Female cognitives and their emotion-based thinking must be managed not to destroy themselves and society. I think for male cognitive with an IQ 115 and above that are not slaves to women, P is excellent. In a way, P creates a cognitive aristocracy and a traditional masculine religion is the only effective tool for cognitive commoner management.The utility of religion is domesticating the slaves of emotion-based thinking. The aristocracy should use philosophy, logic, and reason for decision making. In leading Orthodox, Catholic and Muslim seminaries, Aristotle is studied a lot – as my husband said, why can’t that be updated with P?

    Curt: They Can be (updated with P).

    They, as in ex Muslim women, the men who enable them? As for they can be… my favorite response is Dr Johanthan Haidt on decay. The issue with 6 pronged conservative values is they prevent decay. But every generation of secular women is more degenerate than the next and eats each other. I am a sufi, a moderate who used to go after religious conservatives and moved to Canada .. but then in 15 years I saw the decay of each subsequent generation. Women from when I came to Canada are Audrey Hepburn compared to the blue and green hair tattooed feminist monsters coming out of the schools. And then at 30, they are tired and spent. And the religious immigrant girls who don’t integrate from a patriarchal faith have their pick of men here. If the woman has male cognition, and is an ex Muslim autist, she would agree with me about what happens to female cognitive ex Muslim women over time. Female cognition is a problem: if you give them power they ruin everything! And the way you control them is not the way you think for yourself. When one is motivated by logic and reason, they first go to Aristotle for their thinking, Marcus Aurellius … but its so nice to have something modern and even more relevant like P. P for the aristocracy – a traditional religion for the underclass

    Smart. Very smart. WOMEN Agreed, but In our culture we must state this differently: “We have had centuries to develop many institutional means of controlling men’s bad behavior when they have gained social, economic, and political freedom, but we have not had time to create institutions to control women’s bad behavior when they have social economic and political freedom – and women, just like men, clearly have many bad behaviors we need institutions to control.” ARISTOCRACY: Agreed .. But in our culture, where the majority is in the middle, not the bottom, we use tri-partism and tri-functionalism, so we must have three: “Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.” WORK: I have so many projects I would like to finish: 1) to rewrite all of Aristotle in propertarian prose. 2) to write a tripartite theology for western peoples 3) to try write one book that tries to reform christianity, islam, judaism, buddhism – if not hinduism (i don’t think I can understand it) so that they are rational as well as spiritual, but not in conflict with the natural law. I will not live long enough to do all these things. But I’ll do the best I can. 😉

  • Market Demand for Systems of Choice

    —“Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.”– We need all three. This was one of the first concepts I devoted effort to, back in the 1990’s.