Form: Quote Commentary

  • GOOD ADVICE FROM A CHRISTIAN From Anon (via pm) (CD: See. If you get enough of a

    GOOD ADVICE FROM A CHRISTIAN

    From Anon (via pm)

    (CD: See. If you get enough of a solution the people help you. A “Discernment Movement”. “Christisim, Churchianity, and Orthodoxy”. Hmmm… that sets up Jesus vs political religion vs social religion nicely like the conflict between Science-Law vs philosophy(political) vs Faith, as the MONOPOLY position in both series failed. This helps a great deal. )

    From Anon;

    Curt. Read your piece – the first sermon. You’re doing quite a good job. I call it a Discernment Movement!

    On the piece, I have shared similar view about Christianity and I have for long, distance myself from the church and often avoid confrontation with dogma-infused people I know.

    I think you could do so much better by getting more people on your side by either:

    1. Developing on these themes: Christism or Christology (you could find better name) to promote the exact teachings and practice of Jesus – the ‘first sermon’ captures it well – as again current Christianity which is a dogma. Present Christianity is to be deservingly attacked as’ ‘Churchianity,’ your accurate construct. Both approaches are better to maximise benefits. It may be difficult to reform Christianity as it is, reason for the new approach.

    2. Do a propertarian interpretation of the Bible – which could on its be a bestseller. I think it could potentially knock down struggling Churchianity and a special propertarian biblican account of Jesus and how he should be understood, followed and a standard to determine those who pervert, undermine, and manipulate his brand for other purposes can be identified. This could be a potential canon in the making to liberate all under the effective control of churchian leaders.

    (CD: We would need to do Aristotle, The Epic Cycle, The Bible, and the Germanic-nordic) Cycle. I understand the need for the first two I didn’t think of really doing over the bible but i certainly am beginning to get there…. hmmm. very smart.)

    You can see, I already like the construct, churchian.

    3. 1 and 2 to go together. This is where the mass body of Christianity could be forced to rethink and also pay attention to propertarianism.

    Finally, if you’re to consider this suggestion, observe this as well, while promoting propertarian Christism (let’s that be a dummy name), refrain from using attacking current Christian community as a whole for rhetorical reason – let people, the audience concentrate on the message ONLY.

    However, for the them on attacking Churchianity, you critique limit it to critique and moderate use of strong words at this outset.

    Reasonable, decent people, those who want to be Christ-like, I think, will pay attention if it’s devoid of strong language and attack.

    Again, the consideration here is rhetoric.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 14:39:00 UTC

  • ADViCE FOR NEWBS? —“Hello Curt, I have been trying to follow your work but the

    ADViCE FOR NEWBS?

    —“Hello Curt, I have been trying to follow your work but the vocab is above my level, I was wondering if you could recommend me anything similar to your work but a bit easier to read for the less seasoned reader so I can work up to your stuff?”—

    Personally I think everything I recommend will take you years of work to read through. Check out our reading list.

    I would say that when you don’t understand terms, simply ask, and we’ll provide links, and share those links too. So that means when you don’t understand something, and ask, we teach everyone who doesn’t understand.

    We are very patient in teaching the vocabulary because we know that like *any system of measurement* it’s the primary hurdle to learning Natural Law (P-Law).

    My experience is that John Mark and InTruthVictorious videos are the best explanation.

    But everyone here will help if you ask, and we prefer this ‘hands on’ teaching of others rather than sending you off to read because it builds skill in both you and the teacher, and develops relationships.

    It TAKES TIME. There are only a few basic concepts really, and not that many terms that explain them. But learning to (a) use them rather than appeal to your intuition, and (b) use equilibrial thinking, and (c) use full accounting takes some time. Its a lot like learning programming.

    Others please comment with advice.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 13:48:00 UTC

  • MORE ADVOCACY OF ORTHODOXY AS A STATE RELIGION (and correcting me) by James Dmit

    MORE ADVOCACY OF ORTHODOXY AS A STATE RELIGION

    (and correcting me)

    by James Dmitro Makienko

    I made a long detailed post on the christian denial of the laws evident in god’s hand.

    Here: https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle.personal/posts/253632416034919

    James corrects me – as did others, that none of these criticisms apply to orthodoxy only to evangelicals and catholics. I might argue that the church of england might apply as well. (Where I was married)

    I agree on orthodoxy as the optimum political christian religion. I only argue that the evangelicals are closest to jesus’ teachings as a folk religion, and I only make that argument in order to advance some form of nationalist christianity that tolerates the entire spectrum of human cognition: feeling, intuition, reason, observation.

    The only thing I criticize in the slavic sphere (a) intermarium inability to produce commercial and military scale, and (b) russian inability to produce trust at scale, rule of law at scale, and use of rule of law to suppress corruption at scale.

    Conversely, the number of things I criticize in the west middle east and far east are endless.

    I tend to use christianity to refer to evangelical, protestant, and catholic divisions, and I call out orthodoxy in particular. I will try to correct this habit as “western christianity” instead of ‘christianity’ but I think it will be a hard habit to break.

    thank you for the ‘correction’. 😉

    James correctly answers below.

    == From James Dmitro Makienko ==

    To clarify on what you said about Christianity “denying”, NONE of that applies to Orthodox Church.

    Of this set of God’s laws, what does Christianity DENY?

    1. physical laws of nature. – You won’t see any of this “young earth creation” crap in Orthodox churches, they are generally accepting of science now and don’t try to override it.

    6. the political law of homogeneity – Virtually every Orthodox church is nation-centered – hence you have Greek, Ukrainian, Bulgarian, Russian, Serbian, Georgian, Armenian, Coptic Ethiopian, Coptic Egyptian, Romanian, North Macedonian etc – this is why it has such difficulty in multicultural countries like Canada and America to create its own indigenous Orthodox church. We have Armenian and Ethiopian that go to out church, but we are Ukrainian, do our liturgy in Ukrainian, and not destroying our identity because there are people who are not Ukrainian.

    7. the evolutionary law of transcendence – we venerate numerous saints who have transcended through their works, and a lot of them did it through military victories and statesmanship.

    8. the … law of self domestication – there are many ways such as numerous feasts/fasting throughout the year, which toughens you in case hard times hit, rituals you do, which presents a framework for all classes to work together and not go after each other

    9. the … law of competition. – Do you mean economic competition (no Orthodox will have an issue with that, most will be negative towards socialism) or competition on the marketplace of ideas (Orthodox church likes to test things against time, so thats why a lot of things may take a few generations to implement – it is slow, yet it exists and we recognize its importance)

    Now if you apply it to the modern evangelical Christianity you will see that:

    1. Laws of nature – lawsuits against teaching of evolution, “bible parks” that promote young earth creationism – they literally allocate millions of dollars that they fleece from their hapless flocks to promote their anti-scientific falsehoods.

    6. Homogeneity – all the multi-culti crap you hear from liberal media is in evangelical (especially mainline) churches “we’re all the same, in jesus name, god loves you regardless of your skin, lets sing kumbaya for jesus” etc. Canada’s United Church is the absolute worst in trying to cuck to the progressives

    7. Evolutionary law of transcendence – they do the opposite, they love to revel in underclasses, and promote the message of equality regardless of cost or merit.

    8. Self domestication? Not much on this front either, because why domesticate when jesus loves you the way you are

    9. Competition? This is where evangelicals are actually outdo themselves, as they like to latch onto different new worldly ideas and modify them for their needs. It sometimes may come at the cost of discarding doctrine – but who cares about doctrine when to be “saved” in evangelical christianity you just need to say a Shahada(declaration of faith) that “i accept jesus christ as my lord and savior” – just like in Islam (that Mo is the prophet).

    The speculation about an industrial age in the first or second century AD which Christianity allegedly averted makes about as much sense as if ancient Egypt didn’t collapse we’d all be living in the giant space-travelling pyramids heading for nearest stars. We wuz space vikangs and shiet (makes me think of that lost vikings game of the early 90s!)

    It is impossible to combine all of Christianity into one-size-fits-all model. As for the reasons of the collapse of the Roman Empire it’ll just take me too much time to research and argument. In brief, i think you give Christianity too much credit for the collapse of the Roman Empire, as most of the 4th century was spend by Christians coming up with a Nicene creed and confronting Arianism(Jesus created & not divine, non-trinitarian), then confronting Nestorianism(Mary mother of Jesus, dyophysitism of Christ etc).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 13:40:00 UTC

  • “SO THAT THE TRUE CAN BE MADE BEAUTIFUL, BUT THE MERELY BEAUTIFUL CANNOT BE MIST

    “SO THAT THE TRUE CAN BE MADE BEAUTIFUL, BUT THE MERELY BEAUTIFUL CANNOT BE MISTAKEN FOR TRUTH.”

    —“Joyce said truth is apprehended by the intellect which is appeased by the most satisfying relations of the intelligible. Beauty is beheld by the imagination which is appeased by the most satisfying relations of the sensible. Think lit has more to do with the latter than the former. It’s philosophical only secondarily.”—Tim Beckley

    Damn! See? That’s why we need poetry, literature, philosophy, law and science. So that the true can be made beautiful, but the merely beautiful cannot be mistaken for truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 12:10:00 UTC

  • “ITS TIME TO CREATE A NEW NORMAL” —“The government has no end in sight for ret

    “ITS TIME TO CREATE A NEW NORMAL”

    —“The government has no end in sight for returning to normal. So why should we? Let’s create a new normal.”—Jesse Daughtry

    ==

    @john mark : possible framing?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 12:05:00 UTC

  • “there exists such a thing as better people. unfortunately, people contest this.

    —“there exists such a thing as better people. unfortunately, people contest this.”—Micah Pezdirtz

    —“To acquire virtue one must first have the the capacity and the desire. More so the desire.”— Anon

    —“Virtue isn’t an accident. It’s an acquired skill.”– Anon

    —“We never know if a man is good until after he is dead”– Montaigne

    Translated: Work at it. But, as long as we are still living, we have opportunity to screw it all up. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-10 19:57:00 UTC

  • “Public school is a social event… and mostly a bad one that you shouldn’t want

    –“Public school is a social event… and mostly a bad one that you shouldn’t want your children to experience.”—Heimdallr Aldafaðir


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-10 15:46:00 UTC

  • “Most orthodox churches – Greek, Serbian, Ukrainian, Bulgarian, Russian, Romania

    —“Most orthodox churches – Greek, Serbian, Ukrainian, Bulgarian, Russian, Romanian – are organized around a nation, language and culture. This is why in a multi-cultural societies they have a hard time starting new Orthodox churches from zero. Because people will be drawn to existing national Orthodox churches. So you don’t need to tell any Orthodox twice about why being a nationalist is good 🙂 “—James Dmitro Makienko


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-10 15:40:00 UTC

  • RT @JayMan471: IQ is the causal variable

    RT @JayMan471: IQ is the causal variable https://www.unz.com/jman/obesity-and-iq/ https://twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/1248305691577552897

  • Apr 9, 2020, 11:12 PM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzLfL1WyGME&feature=shareUpdated Apr 9, 2020, 11:12 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-09 23:12:00 UTC