Form: Quote Commentary

  • “Pure brilliance. Now, how do we find someone who can carry that vision into the

    —“Pure brilliance. Now, how do we find someone who can carry that vision into the world and gain that necessary critical mass? Truly, those solutions will change the world and make it a peaceful, happy, functional place. I’ll set my mind to how we can find the leader now.”—

    When we decided to “make propertarianism” as a spin-off of Hans Hoppe’s property and freedom society, we did it under the assumption that I was not the political face of the movement.

  • Yes, physics like war disciplines the mind. So…

    —“I’ve never noticed physicists to be humbled, but I believe that the physical world has disciplined them to recognize that if they don’t wish to look foolish it’s best to learn to partition their questions so that they only ask the questions which are robust to the errors within any given theory.”–Eric Weinstein

    Agreed. So the question is why we don’t simply save all civilization by limiting speech to the public in matters public to that which is robust to errors within a given theory AND is reciprocal, testifiable, and within limits of restitutability?

    I mean, that’s what P-Law does right? It criminalizes indiscipline, false promise, baiting into hazard, undermining, sedition and TREASON against the natural law, testimony according to that law, and the european tradition of building a scientific system of thought, society, economy, and government.

    Why? Because science is just another name for testimony, and testimony under threat of perjury is how you stop the lying.

  • Yes, physics like war disciplines the mind. So…

    —“I’ve never noticed physicists to be humbled, but I believe that the physical world has disciplined them to recognize that if they don’t wish to look foolish it’s best to learn to partition their questions so that they only ask the questions which are robust to the errors within any given theory.”–Eric Weinstein

    Agreed. So the question is why we don’t simply save all civilization by limiting speech to the public in matters public to that which is robust to errors within a given theory AND is reciprocal, testifiable, and within limits of restitutability?

    I mean, that’s what P-Law does right? It criminalizes indiscipline, false promise, baiting into hazard, undermining, sedition and TREASON against the natural law, testimony according to that law, and the european tradition of building a scientific system of thought, society, economy, and government.

    Why? Because science is just another name for testimony, and testimony under threat of perjury is how you stop the lying.

  • The Barriers to Right Activism

    —“Identify the barriers and lift them. The problem is obvious but why is it like this? We need data on what these barriers are for the right. Is it the fact that they have to much to lose? Comfort? Security? Or cowardness?”—Bjorn Hocke

    The barriers to right activism are:

    1 – Boyhood: No intention to do anything, just find shallow dominance expression from the safety and anonymity of being online (these are undesirables);
    2 – Cowardice: (lots of Xian’s in this category);
    3 – Right Psychology (a) lower agreeableness (b) tendency to over-rely on self-judgment, (c) tendency to demand self-determination, need for control, need for understanding, need for certainty, need for leaders they understand. This leads to atomization and the near panic of ‘just show up and we’ll figure it out. The left ‘just shows up and figures it out. Because they are not concerned with status or hierarchy.
    3 – Relative Poverty such that they can’t show up because they’re already disenfranchised; living on marginal income so that they can’t afford the time off or away;
    4 – Responsibilities so that they can’t afford being away without serious consequences;
    5 – Consequence of doxxing by GSRRM that would hurt them their income or their families;
    6 – Wives or girlfriends that would leave them if they did;
    7 – and property that they have accumulated that they are unable or willing to expose to risk.

    The left is not burdend by these constraints. Why? The right manages vast commons and the left consumes them. This is the difference in our ‘wiring’. Male capitalization (pack territory and resources), female consumption (herd and offspring consumption before others beat them to it.)

    This is why only a mass movement will work and ‘resistance’ won’t. It’s because without certain reprisals for the left’s DOXX machine, the right afford to show up.
    Hence my strategy. Hence why everyone else’s is a lost cause.

  • The Barriers to Right Activism

    —“Identify the barriers and lift them. The problem is obvious but why is it like this? We need data on what these barriers are for the right. Is it the fact that they have to much to lose? Comfort? Security? Or cowardness?”—Bjorn Hocke

    The barriers to right activism are:

    1 – Boyhood: No intention to do anything, just find shallow dominance expression from the safety and anonymity of being online (these are undesirables);
    2 – Cowardice: (lots of Xian’s in this category);
    3 – Right Psychology (a) lower agreeableness (b) tendency to over-rely on self-judgment, (c) tendency to demand self-determination, need for control, need for understanding, need for certainty, need for leaders they understand. This leads to atomization and the near panic of ‘just show up and we’ll figure it out. The left ‘just shows up and figures it out. Because they are not concerned with status or hierarchy.
    3 – Relative Poverty such that they can’t show up because they’re already disenfranchised; living on marginal income so that they can’t afford the time off or away;
    4 – Responsibilities so that they can’t afford being away without serious consequences;
    5 – Consequence of doxxing by GSRRM that would hurt them their income or their families;
    6 – Wives or girlfriends that would leave them if they did;
    7 – and property that they have accumulated that they are unable or willing to expose to risk.

    The left is not burdend by these constraints. Why? The right manages vast commons and the left consumes them. This is the difference in our ‘wiring’. Male capitalization (pack territory and resources), female consumption (herd and offspring consumption before others beat them to it.)

    This is why only a mass movement will work and ‘resistance’ won’t. It’s because without certain reprisals for the left’s DOXX machine, the right afford to show up.
    Hence my strategy. Hence why everyone else’s is a lost cause.

  • the words ‘fair’ and ‘fairness’ appear only in the languages of northwest Europe

    —“despite their roots in Proto-Indo-European, the words ‘fair’ and ‘fairness’ appear only in the languages of northwest Europe where they originally referred only to behavior within the tribe. This is clearly a marker for the importance of moral reputation within the group, and it suggests selection for these traits in the northwest of Europe but not elsewhere throughout the extensive areas conquered by the Indo-Europeans.”—

  • the words ‘fair’ and ‘fairness’ appear only in the languages of northwest Europe

    —“despite their roots in Proto-Indo-European, the words ‘fair’ and ‘fairness’ appear only in the languages of northwest Europe where they originally referred only to behavior within the tribe. This is clearly a marker for the importance of moral reputation within the group, and it suggests selection for these traits in the northwest of Europe but not elsewhere throughout the extensive areas conquered by the Indo-Europeans.”—

  • “The Witch is dead. Which old Witch? The Wicked Witch! Ding Dong! The Wicked Wit

    —“The Witch is dead. Which old Witch? The Wicked Witch!

    Ding Dong! The Wicked Witch is dead.”—

    YAAAAY!!!!


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-18 19:53:00 UTC

  • Bannon on Fox with Tucker last night: “The War Begins November 3rd.” Oh goodie

    Bannon on Fox with Tucker last night: “The War Begins November 3rd.”

    Oh goodie.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-18 13:13:00 UTC

  • RT @DegenRolf: Psychology finding, suggesting that “we are all liberals at heart

    RT @DegenRolf: Psychology finding, suggesting that “we are all liberals at heart,” goes down the drain in failed high-quality replication.…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-18 06:20:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1306840619344629761