Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • “The variables which were corrected for brain size [in the study of the corpus c

    —-“The variables which were corrected for brain size [in the study of the corpus callosum] were usually significantly larger in females, although this pattern varied in each sample. The statistical pattern of sexual dimorphism for the human Corpus Callosum differs from that found in most other neural structures, such as the amygdaloid nucleus, cerebellum, hippocampus, and thalamus. The absolute sizes of these structures are always significantly larger in males. When corrected for brain size, the relative sizes are not significantly larger. The Corpus Callosum is the only structure to show a larger set of relative measures in females.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-25 01:01:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/120038346_386751062723053_5304029135

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/120038346_386751062723053_5304029135

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/120038346_386751062723053_5304029135867448540_o_386751059389720.jpg Clear, Correct, and Recent: It’s Just Neurons Stupid.

    https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00044/full#:~:text=Conclusions%20From%20Genetic%20Studies,of%20the%20most%20heritable%20traits.Clear, Correct, and Recent: It’s Just Neurons Stupid.

    https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00044/full#:~:text=Conclusions%20From%20Genetic%20Studies,of%20the%20most%20heritable%20traits.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-23 16:20:00 UTC

  • An Insight Worth Repeating —“What I find interesting is that the reproductivel

    An Insight Worth Repeating

    —“What I find interesting is that the reproductively favorable traits: Height, Light Skin, Blue Eyes, Blonde Hair, Sociability, Agency, Milk, and Grain tolerance end up in Europeans thus maintaining SIGNAL neoteny without sexual neoteny as in east Asia. Despite the fact that these traits evolved in different places in different groups, europeans collected them. and it’s because of the range of eurasian genetic experimentation in varying climates and conditions. This is one of the key insights I’ve had. East Asians overplayed neoteny. Africans, Austronesians (impulsivity) and Semites underplayed neoteny (aggression). Europeans collected highly desirable features abandoning primitive rapid maturity, deep morphology, and lack of agency (Africa) without sacrificing reproductive desirability (east Asians), or carrying reproductive undesirability to extremes (Australians). In other words, Europeans selected for symbolic neoteny without significant suppression of sexual maturity. Thus creating a balance between impulsive and rapidly maturing Africans, and calm slowly maturing east Asians. It’s like the three little bears: “this one is just right”.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-23 12:28:00 UTC

  • This has explanatory power but I don’t know what research it’s coming from, and

    This has explanatory power but I don’t know what research it’s coming from, and i’m suspicious.

    —“…there were several migrations from Eurasia into Africa. The Khoi and San populations are descendants of a back-migration from Asia. Additionally, it was found that the Austronesian expansion had also stronger influence on Africa than suggested before. Between 1% to 10% of eastern Africans have East Asian-related ancestry from Austronesians.”—

    ( Göran Dahl? )

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-22 22:13:00 UTC

  • Conclusion from Yuan et al. 2019: —“We have shown that there are only three ma

    Conclusion from Yuan et al. 2019:

    —“We have shown that there are only three major human groups, Africans (Negroid), East Asians (Mongoloid), and Europeans/Indians (Caucasoid). Aboriginal Australians and the related Papuans, traditionally viewed as the fourth major group, in fact consist of largely European/Indian and African genomes and their unique traits might have come from admixture of incoming Neanderthals with local archaic humans.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-22 21:41:00 UTC

  • TESTIMONY —“I was so offended when I read “elevated intelligence of East Asian

    TESTIMONY

    —“I was so offended when I read “elevated intelligence of East Asians and Western Europeans” in your response. But I get what you are saying now! I never really understood the after effects of Eugenics. In the social discourse its always framed as a bad idea that never took root. Oh Yes it did! I would like to read more about of your studies.”— (Quora Reader)

    Thanks. We are not very different really. We hybridize too quickly when there is an evolutionary advantage. The primary difference is (a) degree of neoteny, (b) size of the underclass. ( c) the technology of ‘culture’ meaning group strategy, mythology, traditions, norms, and method of persuasion(argument). (d) technology in general spreads more rapidly than cultural technology or genes.

    This means all human groups can (eventually) achieve parity if they limit the reproduction of the underclasses. This is, however, a very difficult thing to do if you need to alter a lare population (india). A very difficult thing for a government to do under democracy (modern europe, south america), and harder to do under a religion that favors the underclass (the middle east).

    This is why only east Asians and Europeans did it in the past: 1) a powerful aristocratic class, 2) homogenous enough polities that it doesn’t pit tribes or clans against one another. 3) The desire to keep the costs of conflict down (economic self interest).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-22 19:06:00 UTC

  • by Adam Voight I have been reading the Bible of late, and it seems that its core

    by Adam Voight

    I have been reading the Bible of late, and it seems that its core theme is race, by which I mean a group of people with:

    1) common ancestry

    2) who recognize each other

    3) who are natural allies

    4) who have a common moral valuation

    5) who serve the same God(s)

    #4 is shown that for every major plot-turn in the Biblical meta-narrative, the human race divides into on side that makes the proper choice and one or many that choose wrongly or are simply chosen by God as being the “bad guys”. And for each and everyone of these, the latter inherits some form of “sin” and the former inherits a “covenant” with God.

    1) Adam/Eve/Serpent all inherit sin and punishment

    2) Abel/Cain

    3) Noah/ everyone else

    4) Abraham/ everyone else e.g. Sodom and Gomorrah

    5) Jacob/Esau

    6) Israel/Egypt

    etc.

    And finally, Us and the “Pharisees”, with whom we have so much difficulty.

    Jesus to the Pharisees: “Ye are of your father the Devil…”Look it up; the Gospel of John was the last to be written; by then the difficulties with the Jews had become more obvious and violent. Notice how Devil = lies and deceit.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-22 13:04:00 UTC

  • Throughout all of history. “The Invention of The mass production of lying by Soc

    Throughout all of history. “The Invention of The mass production of lying by Social Construction, using false promise of freedom from physical natural and evolutionary laws.” Judaism/Islam are not primitive. They’re as radical an innovation in deceit as Aristotelianism in truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-20 17:53:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307739755522805762

    Reply addressees: @adinhaykin @nathancofnas

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288106527824310272

  • Throughout all of history. “The Invention of The mass production of lying by Soc

    Throughout all of history. “The Invention of The mass production of lying by Social Construction, using false promise of freedom from physical natural and evolutionary laws.” Judaism/Islam are not primitive. They’re as radical an innovation in deceit as Aristotelianism in truth.

    Reply addressees: @adinhaykin @nathancofnas

  • “Pure brilliance. Now, how do we find someone who can carry that vision into the

    —“Pure brilliance. Now, how do we find someone who can carry that vision into the world and gain that necessary critical mass? Truly, those solutions will change the world and make it a peaceful, happy, functional place. I’ll set my mind to how we can find the leader now.”—

    When we decided to “make propertarianism” as a spin-off of Hans Hoppe’s property and freedom society, we did it under the assumption that I was not the political face of the movement.