Form: Quote Commentary

  • The Alt Right Can’t Reform

    —“Most of those would be serious critics, or fellow travelers, have chosen to ignore CD as a crank, deconstructing life, the universe, & everything in a sandbox. It doesn’t matter if you’re a new Athanasius Kircher, if you irritate men into avoiding you.”—

    Truth isn’t a popularity contest. Darwin irritated a lot of those same (ahem) ‘men’. I’m only interested in those who are interested as well. And irritating what we might questionably call ‘men’ who are nazis, xians, or idiots serves my interests: Data says they’re dead weight.

    John’s idea was that we could combine my work on reform, with the alt-right’s agitation, and despite the conflict between intellectual and emotional, turn you morons into something other than sexual, social, economic, and political anal leakage. You failed our test too. 😉

    So, we gave up on you. You want what will fail. You won’t learn from your failures. You won’t accept what WILL work. So you fail and re-fail. Every single person that has tried to unite the right has failed. We failed too. Y’all get what you deserve because you get what you earn.

    The only way to succeed is to marginalize you like everyone else has marginalized you. To continue to let them silence you. Because you will not favor the group, get in line, stay on strategy, stay on message, and take orders. You’re done. You’re disagreeable. It’s your fate.

    And as your future continues to evaporate dooming you to your fate as removed from the gene pool you will continue to double down on your failings like all idiots do, and fade into nothing – more nothing than you are now. Meme’s aren’t power. They’re cowardly apes flinging feces.

  • The Alt Right Can’t Reform

    —“Most of those would be serious critics, or fellow travelers, have chosen to ignore CD as a crank, deconstructing life, the universe, & everything in a sandbox. It doesn’t matter if you’re a new Athanasius Kircher, if you irritate men into avoiding you.”—

    Truth isn’t a popularity contest. Darwin irritated a lot of those same (ahem) ‘men’. I’m only interested in those who are interested as well. And irritating what we might questionably call ‘men’ who are nazis, xians, or idiots serves my interests: Data says they’re dead weight.

    John’s idea was that we could combine my work on reform, with the alt-right’s agitation, and despite the conflict between intellectual and emotional, turn you morons into something other than sexual, social, economic, and political anal leakage. You failed our test too. 😉

    So, we gave up on you. You want what will fail. You won’t learn from your failures. You won’t accept what WILL work. So you fail and re-fail. Every single person that has tried to unite the right has failed. We failed too. Y’all get what you deserve because you get what you earn.

    The only way to succeed is to marginalize you like everyone else has marginalized you. To continue to let them silence you. Because you will not favor the group, get in line, stay on strategy, stay on message, and take orders. You’re done. You’re disagreeable. It’s your fate.

    And as your future continues to evaporate dooming you to your fate as removed from the gene pool you will continue to double down on your failings like all idiots do, and fade into nothing – more nothing than you are now. Meme’s aren’t power. They’re cowardly apes flinging feces.

  • RT @andrewtwalk: One thing that is certain regardless of tonight’s outcome: A ne

    RT @andrewtwalk: One thing that is certain regardless of tonight’s outcome: A new phase of White Evangelical Recrimination think-pieces, wh…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 21:11:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323734540247015425

  • Boost of @BHaze SOPHISTRY FROM SCRIPTURALISM By: @curtd (a) It’s not Godel’s it’

    Boost of @BHaze SOPHISTRY FROM SCRIPTURALISM
    By: @curtd

    (a) It’s not Godel’s it’s just his most recent restatement.
    (c) A proof is a test of internal consistency of its axioms not external correspondence or operational possibility.
    (b) Proofs test axioms and words. Theories test premises and actions.
    (d) Logic falsifies not justifies
    (e) Actions are informationally more complete than words.
    (f) And we must falsify BOTH words and actions.
    (g) There are no such things as ‘ontological proofs’ in and of themselves that are other than meaningless tautologies.
    It’s all just sophistry inherited from scripturalism.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 21:05:59 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105148580089633992

  • “Curt what are your thoughts on Gödel’s ontological proof?”— Two Tweets

    —“Curt what are your thoughts on Gödel’s ontological proof?”—

    Two Tweets: https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1323727511608561665

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: I have no critics that I know of that are not mere rent-seeker

    RT @ThruTheHayes: I have no critics that I know of that are not mere rent-seekers.
    -@curtdoolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 18:04:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323687396622372866

  • Boost of @BHaze MASCULINE GSRRM VS FEMININE GSRRM By: -@curtd The Stupid Male Tr

    Boost of @BHaze MASCULINE GSRRM VS FEMININE GSRRM
    By: –@curtd

    The Stupid Male Trick – Male GSRRM – I don’t understand, you’re wrong.
    The Stupid Female Trick – Female GSRRM – I disapprove, you’re bad.

    The male method: Cast an accusation and cause the author to defend himself, rather than allow the falsehood to spread.

    The female method is to substitute disapproval for truth. The masculine method is to force the author to educate the critic on his terms rather than do the work, or rather than admit his ignorance or status simply asking the question.

    Either you can ask a question if you have little knowledge, you can make a criticism on the terms implied if you have more, or you can explain what you disagree with and ask why you err.

    If I criticize thinkers it’s after understanding their work. In most cases thinkers have only one or two fundamental insights that all their additional prose explains the application of it to a host of contexts.

    Most critics on the other hand have no ideas, only a field of ignorance error bias, and deceit.

    This is the difference between producers and rent seekers.

    Some of us produce ideas.

    The rest consume, or rent seek.

    Male posers are rent seekers.
    I have no critics that I know of that are not mere rent-seekers.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 17:42:44 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105148580342440891

  • Worth repeating

    Worth repeating.

    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/05/27/masculine-gsrrm-versus-female-gsrrm/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 17:40:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323681388344823809

  • “We no longer have the necessary conditions for democracy or a Republic, and res

    —“We no longer have the necessary conditions for democracy or a Republic, and restoring them would require recreating a virtuous elite, a project that takes generations.”— “Jim”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 15:20:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323646326421229569

  • RT @Outsideness: “There were no MAGA riots this year, or any year.”

    RT @Outsideness: “There were no MAGA riots this year, or any year.” https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/riots-election-an-america-afraid-of-its-left/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 07:37:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323529829157904391