Form: Quote Commentary

  • The Source of Difference Between Center and West

    —[M]uslims everywhere (or rather i should say most Muslims i have encountered) do not accept the logical and normative distinction that western philosophy effectuates between the truth-value of statements and the origin of those statements. This is the true nexus of the conflict between Islam and the West. It is a real conflict with stunning consequences.—-Ayelam Valentine Agaliba

  • The Source of Difference Between Center and West

    —[M]uslims everywhere (or rather i should say most Muslims i have encountered) do not accept the logical and normative distinction that western philosophy effectuates between the truth-value of statements and the origin of those statements. This is the true nexus of the conflict between Islam and the West. It is a real conflict with stunning consequences.—-Ayelam Valentine Agaliba

  • The Pentatuch, Bible, and Constitution?

    [T]here is very little difference between the negotiated construction of the Pentateuch, or the Bible, and the American Constitution: they were the product of committees constructing the criteria for civil law. This is quite contradictory to the Indo European Tradition in which law EVOLVES. But these things are constructs of man for the purpose of governing man.

  • The Pentatuch, Bible, and Constitution?

    [T]here is very little difference between the negotiated construction of the Pentateuch, or the Bible, and the American Constitution: they were the product of committees constructing the criteria for civil law. This is quite contradictory to the Indo European Tradition in which law EVOLVES. But these things are constructs of man for the purpose of governing man.

  • Untitled

    http://www.examiner.com/article/of-10-highest-iq-s-on-earth-at-least-8-are-theists-at-least-6-are-christians?CID=examiner_alerts_article


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-23 11:35:00 UTC

  • “Just as law is discovered, and that we need only a small set of axioms from whi

    —“Just as law is discovered, and that we need only a small set of axioms from which all others an be derived; amongst which are natural law, rule of law, and property rights – do we obfuscate gods in that we start with a near-infinite variety the further we go back in time; almost with one distinct God for each miraculously varying pattern; and as we understand more about power structures and humanity, the more we reduce the Godly behaviors into the individual and reduce the amount of gods to believe in, until, finally we have the individual.”— Johannes Meixner

    (That is how great minds find patterns of similarity between previously dissimilar concepts. Awesome. )


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 12:46:00 UTC

  • not an amren fan and and I prefer to avoid racism, but this data is continuing t

    http://www.moreright.net/murder-would-fall-by-91-percent-in-an-all-white-new-york-city/I’m not an amren fan and and I prefer to avoid racism, but this data is continuing the overwhelming evidence that European eugenics is the source of our lower criminality, and that reversing it has the logical effect


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-18 21:57:00 UTC

  • “Add Speaker Ryan To the Hit List of Traitors”— Well, a little aggressive, but

    –“Add Speaker Ryan To the Hit List of Traitors”—

    Well, a little aggressive, but it appears appropriate.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-17 11:40:00 UTC

  • FINANCIAL TIMES: TRUMP IS AMERICA’S PUTIN? Vladimir Putin offers Donald Trump fa

    FINANCIAL TIMES: TRUMP IS AMERICA’S PUTIN?

    Vladimir Putin offers Donald Trump fans a glimpse of the possible

    The Russian leader offers a glimpse of a president unstymied by Congress, writes Courtney Weaver

    Vladimir Putin…Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting on fuel and energy industries in the Kremlin, in Moscow, Russia, Tuesday, Oct. 27, 2015.

    On a blustery evening, a crowd of thousands gather at a political rally, many eager to explain to me why their country needs a strong leader, is right to take a more aggressive stance on the world stage and should be respected and feared by other nations.

    It’s a scene not unlike those I have covered over the past five years as a correspondent for the FT in Russia. Only this time I have not come to see the adoring fans of Vladimir Putin. I am in Macon, Georgia, and the man we are waiting for is Donald Trump.

    One month into a new job covering the US presidential campaign, I am starting to find that the Trump phenomenon is more understandable when viewed through the lens of a Putin-Trump Venn diagram — or, rather, the Venn diagram of their supporters.

    Two weeks ago in Macon at a stadium full of diehard Trump supporters, I met Tal Wollschlaeger, a law student, who declared apropos of nothing and with no knowledge of my background that he wanted to see a US president more like . . . Mr Putin.

    “I think Putin is brilliant!” the twenty-something Mr Wollschlaeger told me as two of his friends nodded in agreement. “He’s taking care of business the way he has to. His country loves him. He’s done well for them. He does what he says and he gets the job done.”

    He continued: “We just have to reassert ourselves. We’ve got to the point where Britain and France can’t look to us for advice because we can’t make the first move any more, because really we’re too weak. We need to get our seat back at the table.”

    At first it seemed like a one-off, a random Putin fan sprouting up like a unicorn in a southern US city nicknamed the Heart of Georgia. But I don’t think Mr Wollschlaeger is an outlier.

    In Dubuque, Iowa, a crucial primary state, the Associated Press recently spoke to Duane Ernster, a local Trump supporter who also offered the Putin comparison. “Maybe we need a warrior instead of a politician,” he said. “People compare Mr Trump to Putin. There’s something to be said about the man who takes care of the Russian people.”

    In a Gallup survey last year — a period marked by Russia’s annexation of Crimea, the war in Ukraine and western sanctions — Mr Putin ranked as the 10th most admired man in America, beating among others vice-president Joe Biden, the Dalai Lama and the actor George Clooney.

    To Mr Putin’s admirers in the US, he offers a tantalising view of what it might be like to have a president stymied by neither Congress nor two-term limits — and one who treats the delicate art of diplomacy more like judo than chess. To many of these people, Mr Trump represents the quixotic tsar who will rid Washington of its gridlock, reverse failed foreign policies and end years of perceived economic decline. If he is Trump the Terrible, so much the better.

    In his campaign, Mr Trump appears to be taking chapters out of Mr Putin’s handbook. There is the creation of a perceived external threat (in Mr Putin’s case, the US and its encroachment into Russia’s sphere of influence; in Mr Trump’s, it is Muslims and illegal immigrants); the salty language; and the stranglehold on national television. Both men are credited with being spontaneous, unpredictable and counter-intuitive, qualities that make it difficult for opponents to out manoeuvre them.

    The two men’s ratings appear to defy logic. Mr Putin’s remains strong despite a worsening economy on the back of western sanctions, lower oil prices and the plunging rouble. Mr Trump’s support improves the more offensive or outlandish his comments become.

    The comparisons to Mr Putin seem to suit Mr Trump just fine, perhaps because he knows they suit part of his base. In the past few months, Mr Trump has declared that he would “get along” with Mr Putin in a way that President Barack Obama has not, and he has been one of the few candidates to express his approval of Moscow’s military campaign in Syria. Mr Trump likes to joke that he and the Russian president are “stablemates” because they both appeared (separately) on the same episode of the US news programme 60 Minutes.

    As for Mr Putin’s impression of Mr Trump? He has yet to comment.

    courtney.weaver@ft.com


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-16 03:56:00 UTC

  • MERKEL “Multiculturalism leads to parallel societies and therefore remains a ‘li

    MERKEL

    “Multiculturalism leads to parallel societies and therefore remains a ‘life lie,’ ” or a sham, she said, before adding that Germany may be reaching its limits in terms of accepting more refugees. “The challenge is immense,” she said. “We want and we will reduce the number of refugees noticeably.”

    Although those remarks may seem uncharacteristic of Merkel, she probably would insist that she was not contradicting herself. In fact, she was only repeating a sentiment she first voiced several years ago when she said multiculturalism in Germany had “utterly failed.”

    “Of course the tendency had been to say, ‘Let’s adopt the multicultural concept and live happily side by side, and be happy to be living with each other.’ But this concept has failed, and failed utterly,” she said in 2010.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-15 04:31:00 UTC