https://t.co/pYojn9neOXRetweeted Steven Pinker (@sapinker):
The sociological religion of no biological differences between the sexes « Why Evolution Is True
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 06:54:00 UTC
Form: Quote Commentary
-
Steven Pinker (@sapinker): The sociological religion of no biological difference
-
Retweeted Charles Murray (@charlesmurray): They wouldn’t publish this without co
Retweeted Charles Murray (@charlesmurray):
They wouldn’t publish this without controlling for parental IQ, right? I must have missed it. It’s got to be there. https://t.co/vdTtmdVBPf
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 06:53:00 UTC
-
RT @alec_h_tyson: Large majorities of Trump (78%) and Clinton (77%) supporters w
RT @alec_h_tyson: Large majorities of Trump (78%) and Clinton (77%) supporters who are in a relationship, say spouse/partner shares #Electi…
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-19 23:01:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/788877831031906305
-
RT @charlesmurray: This could get to be a problem, evolution-wise
RT @charlesmurray: This could get to be a problem, evolution-wise. https://twitter.com/Burzenland/status/788414772962168832
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-19 23:01:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/788877659174559744
-
Retweeted Alec Tyson (@alec_h_tyson): Large majorities of Trump (78%) and Clinto
Retweeted Alec Tyson (@alec_h_tyson):
Large majorities of Trump (78%) and Clinton (77%) supporters who are in a relationship, say spouse/partner shares #Election2016 preference https://t.co/DuHYeYANwW
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-19 19:02:00 UTC
-
Charles Murray (@charlesmurray): This could get to be a problem, evolution-wise
https://t.co/Mv5hgcWr9rRetweeted Charles Murray (@charlesmurray):
This could get to be a problem, evolution-wise.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-19 19:01:00 UTC
-
“Our enemies are animals, combating them isnt cruelty. It is an act of love and
“Our enemies are animals, combating them isnt cruelty. It is an act of love and absolute devotion to humanity” — Aaron Catlin Styles.
Human?
My definition of human is someone with whom I can cooperate with for reciprocal benefit. My definition of livestock is one that I must manage or maintain – a slave. My definition of animal is one whom I cannot cooperate with nor manage, nor maintain – a resource, a pest, a parasite, or a predator.
One acts as a Human, Livestock, or Animal. What one looks like, or speaks is immaterial. I cannot cooperate with an ape, I may not be able to domesticate it without incurring a net loss. So it remains a resource at best and a pest or parasite or predator under other conditions.
If we cannot cooperate or domesticate a creature it is not human: someone with whom we can cooperate with in the production of goods, services, and information, family, and generations, commons and defense.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-18 10:37:00 UTC
-
“The adaptation – excessive resistance to killing other humans – is that humans
—“The adaptation – excessive resistance to killing other humans – is that humans are dangerous predators that retaliate at high cost to themselves, whereas other creatures do not retaliate at high cost to themselves, they simply avoid taking the risk again. So we evolved for rational reasons, to both retaliate and to avoid retaliation. So it is retaliation humans fear regarding each other, and not regarding beasts. Most creatures flee losses, but humans and chimps reinforce losses purely for defensive reasons.”— Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-18 09:36:00 UTC
-
“This is a problem of extending in group loyalty to all humans. Human genes are
—“This is a problem of extending in group loyalty to all humans. Human genes are only valuable should they be closely related to your own or at least not destructive to your own.
As an emotionally relatable example the cockroach works well. I kill the roach not because I hate the roach, I kill it not for the sake of killing but because it poses some danger to me. I kill the rabbits in my garden not for any hatred of rabbits but because they are destructive to my ends. I kill the deer not because I enjoy hurting it but because it is made of food.
But when we get to those who posses human genes or even humanish form (dicks out for Harambe) there is something in the human mind, whether genetic or memetic I’m not sure, that is repulsed by killing. It may be that this trait was adaptive in that any costs imposed on me by others are less than the costs imposed by the results of humans not being repulsed by killing other humans, even those unrelated to them.”— Ben B. Rodríguez
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-18 09:32:00 UTC
-
“They will rally against us with the criticism of ‘dehumanization’ when we can c
—“They will rally against us with the criticism of ‘dehumanization’ when we can consistently return the criticism with ‘romanticism and pseudoscience’: in other words – you’re just lazy. Confusing conviction with convenience. We are confused. We don’t conflate. We’re men of the west. They are the enemy because they are predatory parasitic animals, and animals need us to domesticate them to make the world safe for Humans.”—Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-18 08:31:00 UTC