Form: Quote Commentary

  • vs Right: Root Conflict

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsTyfPrUlOELeft vs Right: Root Conflict


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 05:56:00 UTC

  • GATTO (MANDATORY MATERIAL FOR PROPERTARIANS) (note: he speaks in a sort of drawl

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj8f7ycnUtUJOHN GATTO (MANDATORY MATERIAL FOR PROPERTARIANS)

    (note: he speaks in a sort of drawl – an emotive, expressive, pedantic and slow speech-pattern that he is as hard to listen to at first. But you get used to it after a bit, and he’s worth it.)

    His “Underground History Lesson”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj8f7ycnUtU

    Spends his life teaching every spectrum of society.

    (He is a catholic it seems, but german grandfather)

    He has great respect for the underclass. He is an equalitarian.

    1) His position is that no people are irredeemable. This is true. I agree. But he’s still making an aristocratic argument because it’s in and of itself not nihilistic, not accommodating, not facilitating, but Paternalistic, Aristocratic, and Monarchic.

    He’s a CHRISTIAN (equalitarian) aristocrat not an ARYAN (hierarchical) aristocrat. In other words he does not see the different strategies in the agrarian farmer of secure island England, and the defensive agrarian farmer in insecure Germany (and the rest of the world.).

    2) He is a critic of aristocracy, but because of its affect on education. He is correct. But he misdiagnoses the cure as POSITIVE (action->education->religion->norm), rather than NEGATIVE (reaction -> law -> markets -> norms) with which we ASSIST people by educating with evidence rather than fantasy, tradition, or hypothesis.

    Physical Law, Law (Natural Law), Economy, Fertility/Prosperity, High arts, and Monuments, are empirical evidence of that which we should teach. And education is assistive, not causal. We do not make agreat civilization through education without first knowing what it is that we have empirically determined that we should educate them with.

    He confuses or conflates

    – Religion, Tradition, CULTURE and Education

    — vs —

    – Law, History, MARKET, and Education

    In other words, he failed to grasp that education – while dialectic (question, discourse, and debate) is missing from eduaction in order to create slaves – that hes describing a market for the acquisition of knowledge that survives competition, and that western civilization is not based upon this constant ‘markets in everything’ that he may or may not understand he values. information(truthful discourse dialectice and debate), dispute resolution (juried courts), market economy, competing houses of parliament, and even the voluntary market for marriage and family. the west = aristocracy and aristocracy = markets in everything = the market for questions and answering and inquiry and skepticism that he values so highly.

    (I say this because he is wrong about hierarchy and diversity.) From the SCIENCE, we know that we create better, happier people with greater consumption, and a better happier society with greater opportunity, and a wealthier nation, more assets, more technology, and more arts and monuments with education. So that we can IMPROVE EVERYONE.

    That is not the same thing as saying that the market sorts us by ability and that the normal distribution of talents will not simply shift, thereby improving everyone, while maintaining everyone’s relative position.

    It may be true that even the worst families may produce a meritocratic child. It is however very evident that each class produces fewer worse offsrping, and more better offspring as class raises. This is just science.

    (very important insight -> )

    3) He fails to grasp that the class system produces a market for FAMILIES to invest in themselves and their reproductive quality not a means of constraining individuals from success independently of family. A family is the central unit of western (and all non-slave) social orders. Western tradition for thousands of years from family, to manor, to monarchy is simply a hierarchy of families (rather than corporations) whose status and achievement is determined by the family as an organization not the individual as a member of a corporation. In other words, western civilization is evolutionarily eugenic – because it creates a market for families, not individuals.

    INDIVIDUALS AND CORPORATIONS VS FAMILIES AND NATIONS

    The fact that our LAWS must target individuals has to do with the necessity that individuals act (and families, tribes, and nations insure), is separate from that our POLICies must target families so that we continue to eugenically improve.

    4) He blames thinkers more so than the economy, which is normal for an educator, but people simply react to opportunity. The reason for the failure of our age is both American due to the industrial revolution, the conteinental expansion, the consequent opportunism, the civil war’s destruction of the rule of law, and the advent of a new pseudoscientific ‘religion’: boaz, marx, freud, cantor, mises, keynes, and Adorno’s frankfurt school, and the opportunity that was created by the (usual) thirty years war of the oppression of germany, just as the north had oppressed the south.

    In each era, some dominant model of thinking arises to reflect the greatest extent of our knowledge because the extent of our knowledge increases explanatory power, and therefore argumentative authority over prior less explanatory and correspondent models of thought.

    The combination of the industrial revolution, (false) equalitarianism, marxism,socialism,world communism (french/russiah/jewish), with the rise in anglo and american empires and their expansionary commercial utopianism, and the inability of the recently unified germans to express in political terms what they expressed in arts, intellect, science, by restoring germanic and hanseatic civilization, is more responsible for the emphasis on industrialization than the people who took advantage of it for reasons of profit and used ideology as an excuse.

    MY THOUGHTS:

    THE WEST IS AN EMPIRICAL CIVILIZATION

    We use markets to calculate truth.

    Makets in discourse for information

    Markets for dispute resolution in courts

    Markets for commons between houses of parliaments.

    Markets for goods and services in the economy

    Markets for reproduction in voluntary marriage

    Markets for voluntary association and cooperation

    THE HIERARCHY OF TESTS IN THE WEST

    – Individual accountability (ethical, moral, rule of law)

    – Individual discipline (hygene, dress, manners, ethics, morals)

    – Individual productivity (voluntary exchagne)

    – Family productivity (marriage and family accountability)

    – Business productivity (business, industry, and financial acctblty)

    – Commons productivity (houses of commons one per class)

    – National Productivity (monarchy, judiciary, military)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-23 14:06:00 UTC

  • “What’s touched me most about Ukrainians, is that they don’t seem to be a self-p

    —“What’s touched me most about Ukrainians, is that they don’t seem to be a self-pitying people. They have a quiet dignity that is more understated than that of the English, but still present.”–Dmitry Chernov

    Dmitry put into words what I wasn’t able to. Beautiful. True.

    That is why I love them I think.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-23 09:42:00 UTC

  • THE WESTERN CANON —“According to the medieval poet Jean Bodel, the Matter of R

    THE WESTERN CANON

    —“According to the medieval poet Jean Bodel, the Matter of Rome was the literary cycle made up of Greek and Roman mythology, together with episodes from the history of classical antiquity, focusing on military heroes like Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar.



    The Matter of Rome also included what is referred to as the Matter of Troy, consisting of romances and other texts based on the Trojan War and its aftereffects, including the adventures of Aeneas.”—

    —“Bodel divided all the literary cycles he knew best into the Matter of Britain, the Matter of France and the Matter of Rome (although “non-cyclical” romance also existed). “—

    This is the same organization that victorians used, but added german and norse.

    The Beginning

    – The Flood – The Story Of The Black Sea Deluge

    – The Rise – The Story of the Aryans -Horse Wheel, Bronze

    – The Fall – The Story of the The Sea Peoples

    The Awakening – Homer

    – The Iliad and the Odyssey

    The Mediterranean

    – Aesop’s Fables

    – The Myths of Greece and Rome

    – The Story of Aneas

    – The Story of Alexander

    – The Story of Caesar

    The Fall

    – The Story of the Fall of Celitica to Rome

    – The Story of the Fall of Rome

    – The Story of the First Great Crime (judeo-christianity)

    – The Story of the Devastation of Islam

    – The Story of the Invasion of the Mongols

    – The Story of the Invasion of the Turks and loss of Byzantium.

    The Dark Ages

    – The “Fairy Tales”

    – The Story of The Isle (pre literate britain)

    – The Story of Arthur (de christianized)

    – The Matter of France (Carolingian Epic)

    – The Matter of Germany, and the North

    – The Matter of Slavs

    The Resurrection –

    – The Rise and Fall of the Templars – Bankers

    – The Rise of the Hansa (north sea) civilization

    – The Rise of science, law, reason,

    – The Rise Water, Steam, and Steel

    – The Atlantic Empire And The Stall of Hansa

    – The Colonial Expansion

    The Second Great Crime:

    – The Divergence of the Anglosophere

    – The Counter – Enlightenment

    – – France, Rousseau, Napoleon

    – – Jews, Marx/Freud/Boaz

    – – The Truncation of Russia, Stalin

    – – The Horrors of China, Mao

    – The Failed Restoration of Hansa Civilization

    – – Romanticism

    – – Germany Hitler

    – The Destruction of America

    – The Islamic invasion of the West

    The Resurrection

    – Truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-21 17:56:00 UTC

  • Bit Of Criticism Of the Pseudoscience of Hindu Origin Myths

    https://www.quora.com/Who-are-the-actual-Aryans-Europeans-Iranians-or-Indians/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv&share=432b3295A Bit Of Criticism Of the Pseudoscience of Hindu Origin Myths.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-21 13:32:00 UTC

  • GOLD (by Jag Bhalla) (from: —“Complexity economist Brian Arthur says science’s

    http://bigthink.com/experts/jag-bhallaPURE GOLD

    (by Jag Bhalla)

    (from: http://bigthink.com/experts/jag-bhalla)

    —“Complexity economist Brian Arthur says science’s pattern-grasping toolbox is becoming “more algorithmic … and less equation-based.” But the nascent algorithmic era hasn’t had its Newton yet.”—

    (curt: exactly. that’s exactly what we’re trying to achieve. The transition from mathematical to algorithmic)

    Nature invented software billions of years before we did. “The origin of life is really the origin of software,” says Gregory Chaitin. Life requires what software does (it’s foundationally algorithmic).

    1. “DNA is multibillion-year-old software,” says Chaitin (inventor of mathematical metabiology). We’re surrounded by software, but couldn’t see it until we had suitable thinking tools.

    2. Alan Turing described modern software in 1936, inspiring John Von Neumann to connect software to biology. Before DNA was understood, Von Neumann saw that self-reproducing automata needed software. We now know DNA stores information; it’s a biochemical version of Turning’s software tape, but more generally: All that lives must process information. Biology’s basic building blocks are processes that make decisions.

    3. Casting life as software provides many technomorphic insights (and mis-analogies), but let’s consider just its informational complexity. Do life’s patterns fit the tools of simpler sciences, like physics? How useful are experiments? Algebra? Statistics?

    4. The logic of life is more complex than the inanimate sciences need. The deep structure of life’s interactions are algorithmic (loosely algorithms = logic with if-then-else controls). Can physics-friendly algebra capture life’s biochemical computations?

    5. Describing its “pernicious influence” on science, Jack Schwartz says, mathematics succeeds in only “the simplest of situations” or when “rare good fortune makes [a] complex situation hinge upon a few dominant simple factors.”

    6. Physics has low “causal density” — a great Jim Manzi coinage. Nothing in physics chooses. Or changes how it chooses. A few simple factors dominate, operating on properties that generally combine in simple ways. Its parameters are independent. Its algebra-friendly patterns generalize well (its equations suit stable categories and equilibrium states).

    7. Higher-causal-density domains mean harder experiments (many hard-to-control factors that often can’t be varied independently). Fields like medicine can partly counter their complexity by randomized trials, but reliable generalization requires biological “uniformity of response.”

    8. Social sciences have even higher causal densities, so “generalizing from even properly randomized experiments” is “hazardous,” Manzi says. “Omitted variable bias” in human systems is “massive.” Randomization ≠ representativeness of results is guaranteed.

    9. Complexity economist Brian Arthur says science’s pattern-grasping toolbox is becoming “more algorithmic … and less equation-based.” But the nascent algorithmic era hasn’t had its Newton yet.

    10. With studies in high-causal-density fields, always consider how representative data is, and ponder if uniform or stable responses are plausible. Human systems are often highly variable; our behaviors aren’t homogenous; they can change types; they’re often not in equilibrium.

    11. Bad examples: Malcolm Gladwell puts entertainment first (again) by asserting that “the easiest way to raise people’s scores” is to make a test less readable (n = 40 study, later debunked). Also succumbing to unwarranted extrapolation, leading data-explainer Ezra Klein said, “Cutting-edge research shows that the more information partisans get, the deeper their disagreements.” That study neither represents all kinds of information, nor is a uniform response likely (in fact, assuming that would be ridiculous). Such rash generalizations = far from spotless record.

    Mismatched causal density and thinking tools creates errors. Entire fields are built on assuming such (mismatched) metaphors and methods.

    Related: olicausal sciences; Newton pattern vs. Darwin pattern; the two kinds of data (history ≠ nomothetic); life = game theoretic = fundamentally algorithmic.

    (Hat tip to Bryan Atkins @postgenetic for pointer to Brian Arthur).


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 12:34:00 UTC

  • RT @sapinker: The sociological religion of no biological differences between the

    RT @sapinker: The sociological religion of no biological differences between the sexes « Why Evolution Is True https://goo.gl/TJG8Tr


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 10:50:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/789056265498595328

  • RT @charlesmurray: They wouldn’t publish this without controlling for parental I

    RT @charlesmurray: They wouldn’t publish this without controlling for parental IQ, right? I must have missed it. It’s got to be there. http…


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 10:50:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/789056170317193216

  • RT @mr_scientism: When you’re smart, you can be wrong in really elaborate ways

    RT @mr_scientism: When you’re smart, you can be wrong in really elaborate ways.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 10:47:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/789055423630409728

  • “High IQ was given to us so that we can rationalize bad behavior”–Youssef Khanj

    –“High IQ was given to us so that we can rationalize bad behavior”–Youssef Khanjari


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 09:25:00 UTC