Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • THERE IS ONLY ONE METHOD OF OPTING-IN by Lorenz Fiorenza —“We only opt-in thro

    THERE IS ONLY ONE METHOD OF OPTING-IN

    by Lorenz Fiorenza

    —“We only opt-in through participation in the militia and the revolution. The system can’t be reformed. If the militia is a sword that forges itself, then it is up to the discretion of the militia to choose what leader they give their sword to. It is a gamble and there is no 100% likelihood of benevolence- Washington could have contracted syphilis and gone mad despite pure intent. The question is, will a world of monarchies be inevitable due to the long-term institutions needed for managing the domestication and transcendence of man?”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-18 15:03:00 UTC

  • “When you have four sons, two can die in the crusade , two can pass on the famil

    —“When you have four sons, two can die in the crusade , two can pass on the family line, and they will have the necessary hate in their hearts to teach their sons to revenge their uncles.”—Ryan Williams

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-17 15:41:00 UTC

  • RUSSIA AND THE FAMILY OVER THE INDIVIDUAL —“Is “utopia” to be found in somethi

    RUSSIA AND THE FAMILY OVER THE INDIVIDUAL

    —“Is “utopia” to be found in something close to the Russian model but with a developed middle class, meaning combining the Russian model with European. And does Eastern-Europe (Poland, Ukraine, etc.) fit those criteria?”—

    Russia has preserved the family, and the west has heralded the individual. Russia has restored the military to the top of the order. The west has the academy (church) at the top of the order. Russia has high corruption for money, America has high corruption for (church) virtue signaling and money.

    How do you fix both? Well, you simply stop playing dishonest games and institute in your constitution that which is important: familiy, and you institutionalize the commons in the service of the family and individuals can benefit only so long as they do not diminish the sacredness of the family. And that’s pretty easy to do. You just have to write it into the law. I can do that.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-17 10:16:00 UTC

  • OF VIOLENCE AGAINST CONSERVATIVES

    http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/16/this-list-of-attacks-against-conservatives-is-mind-blowing/LIST OF VIOLENCE AGAINST CONSERVATIVES

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 09:28:00 UTC

  • “Should” nearly always means “gimme sh-t for free” —Karl Grohe

    “Should” nearly always means “gimme sh-t for free”

    —Karl Grohe

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 14:57:00 UTC

  • THE NEW RIGHT. ALL OF US. ALL MEN. YES ITS AWESOME. —“It sounds like you are s

    THE NEW RIGHT. ALL OF US. ALL MEN. YES ITS AWESOME.

    —“It sounds like you are saying that good men of all the classes (working, labor, middle, upper, academic, etc.), in the current disorder, each with their own language, with their own skills and contributions, can come together consciously in the struggle to correct the wrong of egalitarianism, leftism, progressivism (etc.). That would be awesome.”—Todd Ojala

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 14:11:00 UTC

  • “Traces are still being done on the two firearms recovered at the scene — an SK

    —“Traces are still being done on the two firearms recovered at the scene — an SKS rifle 7.62 (which is a Chinese-made AK variant) and a 9 mm pistol, a law enforcement source tells CNN.”—

    no. an SKS is NOT an AK variant. It is a much more primitive weapon.

    The AK was invented to replace it.

    In technological terms, the sks is a clip-fed rifle like the M1 Garand. The AK is a magazine fed rifle like the M16.

    FWIW: to develop the SKS the russians downscaled the design of the mechanism of a german artillery weapon. (Someone said russian, but I’m pretty certain the history is german artillery ->russian artillery -> russian rifle

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-14 23:58:00 UTC

  • THE BIG QUESTION FOR PETERSON, THAT HARRIS COULDN”T FIGURE OUT HOW TO ASK —“Pe

    THE BIG QUESTION FOR PETERSON, THAT HARRIS COULDN”T FIGURE OUT HOW TO ASK

    —“Peterson manages to inspire me without coming across as foolishly optimistic or unrealistic in expectation. That’s really quite an accomplishment.”—

    (That is because you already agree with him. – Who *doesn’t* agree with him? Why? I read all the same research that he does. I just read very different LITERATURE from that which he does. )

    RESOLVING HARRIS’ QUESTION

    I want to resolve the same question Harris does, but I am capable of asking in more articulately than Harris.

    THE QUESTION FOR JORDAN PETERSON

    “Jordan, given the portfolio of Myth, Literature, History, and Science and Tort Law (record of existential disputes), why does one have to preserve political conflation (combining myth, law, history), choice conflation (the useful, the preferable, the good, and the true) and fictionalism (idealism, supernaturalism, occultism)?

    In other words WHY DO YOU NEED TO PRESERVE LYING when it is by conflation and fictionalism that the west was destroyed in the ancient world; medieval man was trapped in illiteracy and superstition for a dark age – ended by literacy and restoration of our ancient thought; four great civilizations have been destroyed by islam and descended into ignorance; jews were unable to build a territory and institutions, and despite being literate contributed nothing good to human history, and in the modern era, kant, the french and the cosmopolitans, the marxists and the postmodernists have done nothing but attempt to produce a series of counter-enlightenments preventing the completion of the ‘restoration’ (enlightenment) by its extension to the social, political, and juridical sciences?

    Why do we need to circumvent reason, and rely upon lying, when the secret by which the west in the black sea, aegean, Mediterranean, north-baltic sea (hansa), atlantic, and seven-seas eras, dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, disease, and tyranny by the use of Martial Epistemology (Truth), Sovereignty, Heroism, and Markets?

    Why isn’t the battle between good and evil, that between the use of truth in pagan aristocracy and the use of lies in monotheistic underclass socialism?

    Isn’t the battle that we have had for 6000 years, between (a) the revolutionary invention of truth, paternalism, sovereignty, markets, and transcendence of the limits of mind and body, and (b) the counter-revolution against it and the preservation of the primitive? Isn’t the enlightenment and the ongoing counter-enlightemnent just a continuation of the cycle between truth and deceit?

    How is history reducible to anything other than two rare peoples, each at opposite ends of the eurasian continent, (europe and china) inventing reason, and everyone between them retaliating against them in a series of cycles and counter-cycles?

    How is it even conscionable to perpetuate that which was invented and has served as the primary means by which civilization has been reversed, regressed?

    I mean. How is it in any way morally conscionable to advocate the preservation of the greatest cause of murder, suffering, destruction, poverty, ignorance, and dysgenia, – even greater than the black plague – when there is no demonstrable need to do so other than to appeal to the baser elements of man?

    What is the difference between marketing the dream state by saturation in endorphins by hacking man’s submission-to-the-pack instinct, and saturating those endorphins by the use of opium?

    What is the difference between the British sale of opium to the chinese, and the state, academy, and church’s sale of the opium of endorphins to the west?

    Why aren’t constantine and justinian, the middle eastern purveyors of the same thing to the west that the British were to the east?

    What moral justification can you give for what appears to be nothing more than one of the greatest crimes, if not THE greatest crimes, in history: the invention of zoroastrianism-abrahamism? The use of conflation to overload reason as a counter-revolution AGAINST truth and reason?

    THERE ISN’T ANY MORAL JUSTIFICATION FOR IT, IS THERE?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-14 22:26:00 UTC

  • “The African wild dog is a highly social animal, living in packs with separate d

    —“The African wild dog is a highly social animal, living in packs with separate dominance hierarchies for males and females. Uniquely among social carnivores, it is the females rather than the males that scatter from the natal pack once sexually mature, and the young are allowed to feed first on carcasses. The species is a specialised diurnal hunter of antelopes, which it catches by chasing them to exhaustion. Like other canids, it regurgitates food for its young, but this action is also extended to adults, to the point of being the bedrock of African wild dog social life. It has few natural predators, though lions are a major source of mortality, and spotted hyenas are frequent kleptoparasites.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-14 07:52:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.unz.com/pbuchanan/are-we-nearing-civil-war/

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-13 21:11:00 UTC