—“I love violence. Violence is a form of wealth. One can spend it wisely. One can spend it unwisely. One can fail to maintain it, and see it inflated or deflated away. “—
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-26 12:47:00 UTC
—“I love violence. Violence is a form of wealth. One can spend it wisely. One can spend it unwisely. One can fail to maintain it, and see it inflated or deflated away. “—
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-26 12:47:00 UTC
—“Women are made to be loved but they do not seem to know it.”—Francesco Principi
(they are too much social climbers and impulsive nesters. never happy with the status quo. always seeking more. men seek an equilibrium that they can tolerate physically, emotionally, and intellectually. women only seek an equilibrium they can tolerate emotionally. The reason being that they can call upon the resources of men to climb. Men are happy when we discover and hold our place in the hierarchy. Women will always seek to climb it. )
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-26 10:40:00 UTC
—“Intelligence then increases ability to recognize more distant relationships between actions and outcomes, thereby making it possible to see as property (act territorially towards) representational/abstract assets.”—Moritz Bierling
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 13:25:00 UTC
THE CONFLICT: ABRAHAMISM OR ARYANISM?
By Daniel Gurpide (excellent)
I think heroism boils down to the monomyth, as Curt usually reminds us: transcendence.
The possibility of transcendence for Abrahamism takes place in the world beyond, in meta-physics; for Aryanism, on the other hand, it takes place in this world, in meta-history, through the announcement of the the Nietzschean “Übermensch”.
In this sense, the hero’s journey might require sometimes an enemy, which can also be oneself, or the representation that we choose to have of our own past, and more generally of the universe, in relation to the future, the destiny that we want to create.
Virgil stated, ‘We make our destiny by our choice of the Gods.’ Any decision on the future is always a decision on the past—on the origins—and vice versa.
The cultural battle today implies, as always, a conflict of genealogies: Abrahamism or Aryanism?
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-23 07:25:00 UTC
—“Pilpul offends me. The fact that we’re not allowed to simply kill such creatures offends me. The fact that there is an entire people/culture/religion based around psychopathy as a group evolutionary strategy, offends me. Wasting a minute of my time slogging through that dreck, when it’s obvious someone is motivated to their core, by malice and duplicity, and will never even state a plain fact unless pinned down, with all alternatives denied, offends me to my core. It’s cognitively, and emotionally draining dealing with them. And they don’t even seem human. It’s like a malignant, unfathomable, hostile, alien, entity, with a human mask. And the damage it’s done, down through the years. It’s worth a lot of false positives to avoid false negatives in the identification and elimination of such evil.”—- Eli Harman
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 22:17:00 UTC
—“Well, you’ve got to take a run at the bars sometimes if you want to know how big the cage is.”—Karl Grohe
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 19:58:00 UTC
“Man’s got to know his limitations.” -Dirty Harry …
“Unfortunately, some men simply lack the cognitive horsepower to know their own limitations.” -Dunning & Kruger
(By Frank Lovell)
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 18:26:00 UTC
—“Eugenics equalizes the worthy.”—Charles Krafft
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 12:23:00 UTC
—“I personally enjoy Molyneux’s delivery. Assholes need a voice too. Dont hate, because we don’t give a f-ck about your feelings anyway”— Nilam Enliven
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 09:33:00 UTC
—“Part of why the separation of church and state failed is because they forgot to separate Atheism and state.—Ely Harman
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-21 18:22:00 UTC