Form: Quote Commentary

  • “Overfitting explains everything. Counter-signalling explains everything else.”-

    –“Overfitting explains everything. Counter-signalling explains everything else.”— Via Caplan

    Justification explains overfitting.Moral, religious, political, and legal justification explain justificationism.

    Hence the Demand for Falsification.

    So, the question is, *Who and what institutions, disciplines, and professions are perpetuating justificationism?*


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 10:49:00 UTC

  • SOCIAL MEDIA TRUISM —“Exactly. My audience is much larger the more ignorant I

    SOCIAL MEDIA TRUISM

    —“Exactly. My audience is much larger the more ignorant I become.”— Ronald Karinkanta

    —“Dumb people say X. Educated people say Y. Really smart people say X.”—Steve Schneider


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 10:09:00 UTC

  • load time, but he gets there at least loosely: The only common interests america

    http://www.claremont.org/crb/article/the-cold-civil-war/Long load time, but he gets there at least loosely: The only common interests americans have is military defense.

    Literally. That’s it.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 09:35:00 UTC

  • THE INJECTION OF GOD ‘STEALS” AUTHORITY FROM NATURE by Bill Joslin Some of Peter

    THE INJECTION OF GOD ‘STEALS” AUTHORITY FROM NATURE

    by Bill Joslin

    Some of Peterson’s commentary leaves the door open for some abuses. For instance the assertion that truth and science evolved out of and are nested in religious frames. But truth and science has blown that frame apart and the results are atrocious.

    || Science, objective truth ->nested in -> religious, intuitive truth (Christ)->Darwinian utility -> properties of nature.

    I disagree and see the religous frame obsolete and leaves us open to future failings.

    || Truth -> Darwinian utility -> Nature

    Then injection of God and religion “steals” authority from nature.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 09:09:00 UTC

  • “If the meaning of every word is up for debate with moral relativists, there is

    —“If the meaning of every word is up for debate with moral relativists, there is metaphysically zero reason to engage Noel Fritsch

    Ergo, the only solution is violence.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 09:08:00 UTC

  • “My opinion on most topics where I have an opinion, is very nuanced and sophisti

    —“My opinion on most topics where I have an opinion, is very nuanced and sophisticated. But basically I usually agree with the dumb people.”— Eli Harman

    It’s cuz dum peepul arunt cunning enuf to lie good.

    (really. that’s why uneducated people often produce superior polling results.)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 07:55:00 UTC

  • The Priestly Question: On the Restoration of Aristocracy by Special Pleading by

    The Priestly Question: On the Restoration of Aristocracy by Special Pleading

    by James Augustus

    An important insight made by the Reactionaries (literary ‘priestly’ right) that is often over-looked by the martial (upper) and soldiering (mid-to-low) right is the dynamic between power & propaganda, or more accurately, the (totality of existential) dynamics concerning the distribution of rents, discretion (influence) & information.

    And we are often misguided by the fallacy of seeking agreement (through force of reasoned argument & genuine good will) amongst the lower-and-middle priestly classes under the false presumption that power follows propaganda, as opposed to propaganda as the industrial production of weaponized misinformation by priest against the aristocratic, commercial & the suggestible consumer classes.

    And we can blame the priest & Abrahamist, but really it was the mere perusal of rational self-interest given the (incentives) opportunities produced by advent of mass communications & the failure of the aristocracy to adapt to consumer capitalism (a shift of in revenues from rents on feudal holdings to rents on human holdings in exchange for cost of domestication & the product of civilizational order (commons)).

    Europe was just recovering from Abrahamic-monotheism via the Renaissance (rediscovery of Aristotelianism) & the introduction of Empiricism through the Anglo Enlightenment, when we fell to the next wave of deceits & conflations pseudo-science (Abrahamic), pseudo-rationalism (German), literary-moral-fictionalism (French), so we were never able to compete the scientific enlightenment (expand empiricism into the social sciences (law) through the falsification of ‘Man as inherently Moral’ instead of ‘Man as Rational’ (selfishly incentive-driven).

    The purpose of pseudo-science was to resist/destroy empiricism, so that a misguided West could not rule its colonial holdings (84% of the globe) empirically—& we lost the world because of it.

    And when the failures of the pseudo-scientific enlightenment began to accumulate, the response by the Priest was to attack the very notion of objectivity, and therefor measurement, accounting in political economy & scientific narrative.

    So post-modernism is merely the latest iteration of the priestly assault against Aristocracy (markets in everything).

    So to close that thought, we cannot restore the Aristocracy (markets), and by extension the West, by special pleading to the Priestly Class & its subordinates. We cannot restore the west by re-appropriation of the Church.

    The Restoration can only be achieved by our ancient practice of sovereignty by militia, which is to say reintroducing violence into the political process.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-08 22:53:00 UTC

  • is how things work there. It is how things work better

    http://vidmax.com/video/160845-Brother-Slaps-Friend-And-Carries-Home-His-Drunk-Sister-After-A-Long-Night-Of-Drinking#.WYpn7yF7DDU.facebookThis is how things work there. It is how things work better.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-08 21:40:00 UTC

  • “Ya know? Most of the conflation, lies and misinformation is just man makin’ sh-

    –“Ya know? Most of the conflation, lies and misinformation is just man makin’ sh-t up to supplement his inability to climb hierarchy.”—Nick Heywood


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-08 18:21:00 UTC

  • by Simon Ström We may choose at all times to cooperate, disassociate or aggress.

    by Simon Ström

    We may choose at all times to cooperate, disassociate or aggress. The market equilibrium of such agency produces an institutional phenotype which reflects the distribution of agency, and tends to approximate the highest possible degree of voluntary cooperation between peers, because that is most mutually beneficial.–Until it’s not.

    A great discrepancy in agency between agents creates more incentives for the superior part to aggress, to the point of *that* no longer being most profitable (e.g. destruction of the subjugated).

    Natural law maximizes cooperation but only among those who willingly cooperate–the militia.

    It does so as much as it discourages the granting of discounts to outgroups for a reason that in no way is profitable for the ingroup.

    A militia of sovereigns is contingent on some degree of homogeneity of agency which is why its membership is generally limited to a subset of a population.

    And, is why the age of American ‘liberty’ was also one of colonialism, ethnic cleansing and conquest, and slavery and segregation.

    (curt: well done)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-08 14:17:00 UTC