Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • “Shared activities are not the same as shared values.”— James Santagata (Or, V

    —“Shared activities are not the same as shared values.”— James Santagata (Or, Via reciprocity (markets) can cooperate on common means, even if we cannot cooperate on uncommon ends.)

  • “Shared activities are not the same as shared values.”— James Santagata (Or, V

    —“Shared activities are not the same as shared values.”— James Santagata

    (Or, Via reciprocity (markets) can cooperate on common means, even if we cannot cooperate on uncommon ends.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-03 12:23:00 UTC

  • by Alexander Brown I used to be a total Christian. And that was when I was very

    by Alexander Brown I used to be a total Christian. And that was when I was very very stupid. I was even a practising Jew. I observed the seventh day sabbath. Now, I know that the only thing to trust is truth, and that God that is compatible with truth, science, natural law and laws of nature. I also have become aware that all men cannot be available. Because all men are not equal. And that the men that matter, and those with agency, are predetermined genetics and are indeed few. I would thus advise you to take responsibility. To love a clean life but if you must act to survive, do not hesitate. Learn to find the men that would reciprocate in mutually beneficial exchanges and partner with them. Avoid all other men. While at it, do be like the American: have manners, engage, explore, extend good will, throat punch when insulted and WIN. Or, be like the Japanese: take the insult in a good stride, wait for your opportunity and retaliate in sudden blitzkrieg. Or act the Russian: never forget, never forgive. Or the Jew: make money and control as many as is possible, regardless – and by deception or whatever means. Because, the billions don’t say fair.

  • by Alexander Brown I used to be a total Christian. And that was when I was very

    by Alexander Brown I used to be a total Christian. And that was when I was very very stupid. I was even a practising Jew. I observed the seventh day sabbath. Now, I know that the only thing to trust is truth, and that God that is compatible with truth, science, natural law and laws of nature. I also have become aware that all men cannot be available. Because all men are not equal. And that the men that matter, and those with agency, are predetermined genetics and are indeed few. I would thus advise you to take responsibility. To love a clean life but if you must act to survive, do not hesitate. Learn to find the men that would reciprocate in mutually beneficial exchanges and partner with them. Avoid all other men. While at it, do be like the American: have manners, engage, explore, extend good will, throat punch when insulted and WIN. Or, be like the Japanese: take the insult in a good stride, wait for your opportunity and retaliate in sudden blitzkrieg. Or act the Russian: never forget, never forgive. Or the Jew: make money and control as many as is possible, regardless – and by deception or whatever means. Because, the billions don’t say fair.

  • by Alexander Brown I used to be a total Christian. And that was when I was very

    by Alexander Brown

    I used to be a total Christian. And that was when I was very very stupid.

    I was even a practising Jew. I observed the seventh day sabbath.

    Now, I know that the only thing to trust is truth, and that God that is compatible with truth, science, natural law and laws of nature.

    I also have become aware that all men cannot be available. Because all men are not equal. And that the men that matter, and those with agency, are predetermined genetics and are indeed few.

    I would thus advise you to take responsibility. To love a clean life but if you must act to survive, do not hesitate.

    Learn to find the men that would reciprocate in mutually beneficial exchanges and partner with them. Avoid all other men.

    While at it, do be like the American: have manners, engage, explore, extend good will, throat punch when insulted and WIN.

    Or, be like the Japanese: take the insult in a good stride, wait for your opportunity and retaliate in sudden blitzkrieg.

    Or act the Russian: never forget, never forgive.

    Or the Jew: make money and control as many as is possible, regardless – and by deception or whatever means.

    Because, the billions don’t say fair.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-03 08:07:00 UTC

  • “You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your

    —“You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your own variant of the Nuremberg laws, as well as immigration policy. What’s the required vetted minimum IQ for migrants and citizens reaching the age of majority, among other requirements in maintains a viable polity?”— It depends upon two factors: a) a relative measurement: your existing median. and b) an absolute measurement: I work with the rule of thumb of approx 106 being the line of demarcation between those who can solve problems (fix machines, learn from manuals rather than instruction) and those who cannot. I don’t see any reason why you’d immigrate anyone who wasn’t a full standard deviation above your mean. In that case, i’d say 115 if the person has money and is of good character. Above 122 regardless of money. Above 130 and of good character they are going to contribute.

  • “You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your

    —“You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your own variant of the Nuremberg laws, as well as immigration policy. What’s the required vetted minimum IQ for migrants and citizens reaching the age of majority, among other requirements in maintains a viable polity?”— It depends upon two factors: a) a relative measurement: your existing median. and b) an absolute measurement: I work with the rule of thumb of approx 106 being the line of demarcation between those who can solve problems (fix machines, learn from manuals rather than instruction) and those who cannot. I don’t see any reason why you’d immigrate anyone who wasn’t a full standard deviation above your mean. In that case, i’d say 115 if the person has money and is of good character. Above 122 regardless of money. Above 130 and of good character they are going to contribute.

  • “You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your

    —“You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your own variant of the Nuremberg laws, as well as immigration policy. What’s the required vetted minimum IQ for migrants and citizens reaching the age of majority, among other requirements in maintains a viable polity?”—

    It depends upon two factors:

    a) a relative measurement: your existing median. and

    b) an absolute measurement: I work with the rule of thumb of approx 106 being the line of demarcation between those who can solve problems (fix machines, learn from manuals rather than instruction) and those who cannot.

    I don’t see any reason why you’d immigrate anyone who wasn’t a full standard deviation above your mean. In that case, i’d say 115 if the person has money and is of good character. Above 122 regardless of money. Above 130 and of good character they are going to contribute.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-02 21:34:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.wnd.com/2018/03/fatal-delusions-of-western-man/

  • Untitled

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5443599/White-South-African-farmers-removed-land.html#ixzz58VXEVgp7