Form: Quote Commentary

  • The Feminine Mask —“Psychopathic personality is also consistently documented m

    The Feminine Mask

    —“Psychopathic personality is also consistently documented more often in men versus women; in fact, the ratio has been as high as 20:1.

    However, new research suggests that some of the difference between men and women may not be in the existence of deceitful, manipulative, and exploitive personality traits but in the expression of them. Specifically, these researchers found that women may be more likely to express these personality deficits through behaviors that are typically associated with, and diagnosed as, other mental illnesses.

    For example, these researchers found overlap between some of the symptoms such as histrionic personality disorder or borderline personality disorder. (link is external) A woman whose extreme fear of abandonment leads her to periodic outbursts of rage over real or imagined transgressions, flips between seeing her significant other as either completely perfect or totally evil, or who has to constantly be the center of attention (link is external) certainly isn’t who we think of when we think of the classic psychopath. But she may be just as incapable of true empathy, and just as manipulative and deceitful, as the callous, unemotional male.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:44:00 UTC

  • by Daniel Roland Anderson And we have a mechanism for correcting non-corresponde

    by Daniel Roland Anderson

    And we have a mechanism for correcting non-correspondence of the constitution with natural law: the Amendment process—which won’t work in our current demographic situation.

    Do you know many judges you’d trust to implement Natural Law over the plain text of the document?

    I don’t.

    When I hear a “constitutionalist” go on about Natural Law, it’s 99.9% ignorant blather. Curt is the first guy in years to use the term Natural Law in a way that doesn’t make me want to punch someone.

    I suspect Curt provides for decidability whereas others use Natural Law to stand in for “whatever I think is good right now.”

    Curt has done great things for the Common Law that many constitutionalists would throw out with the bathwater if judicial abuse of discretion.

    (CD: Bingo)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:04:00 UTC

  • “Natural law, where it conflicts, must supersede the plain text of the constitut

    —“Natural law, where it conflicts, must supersede the plain text of the constitution.”— Zachary Miller

    Yep.

    The constitution either reflects natural law or it is an irreciprocal contract and therefore CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTION of natural law. Ergo, no constitutional construction may violate the natural law of reciprocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:02:00 UTC

  • (archived for others) PATERNALISM (ARYANISM) WILL HELP YOU LOVE PEOPLE AGAIN —

    (archived for others)

    PATERNALISM (ARYANISM) WILL HELP YOU LOVE PEOPLE AGAIN

    —“The more I learn, and ‘see’ what I learn in people and in the world, I can feel arising in me a tendency to just see most other people as non self aware, selfish actors who simply act (almost deterministically) according to their incentives, within the scope that they can understand…. which usually isn’t very large. On one hand this gives a certain amount of peace, but on the other is the temptation to simply feel atomised and a bit apathetic. Is it possible to love people and love the world despite losing so many illusions about them? And if so, how would you suggest cultivating more of that emotional state?”—Rob McMullan

    Well, this is what I hope ‘the precious few’ achieve: the understanding that propertarianism is as revolutionary as was empiricism, and that it’s not that we CAN’t have relatively free will but that we DON’T have relatively free will, because we are just negotiating machines on behalf of our genes using incentives.

    So, where you say ‘pathetic’ I”ll use the term “dehumanizing” which is how the christian world reacted against the findings of science, and in particular heliocentrism and darwinism.

    But once you ‘adapt’ to your new understanding, you will love people like I do, and like generals love their soldiers, like kings love their people, and mothers love their children.

    The miracle of it all is that IT WORKS. I mean, we actually manage to evolve and live together and drag ourselves into godhood despite being nearly automatons in doing so.

    It’s wondrous!!!

    I found I had an amazing sense of power (mindfulness), and i suspect otehrs do too. the problem is you can’t go around and change the world with the knowledge all that easily. It’s got to ‘grow’ in influence.

    Hence why I”m so concerned not with people agreeing, but with using force to impose the law, from which they will learn by environmental pressure and incentives rather than exposition and understanding.

    Once you return to being an Aryan, and seeing mankind as children and us as gods, you will just love them. It’s the christian falsehood of equality that deprives you of the option of paternalism and love for fellow man.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 11:44:00 UTC

  • “I fucking hate this guy’s unbearably verbose, pseudo-intellectual writing style

    —“I fucking hate this guy’s unbearably verbose, pseudo-intellectual writing style. He rambles on for ages with astonishingly long run-on sentences when his point could easily be made with half the effort.”— Baron von Plebe.

    I write in and teach how to argue and write law in operational language (using the natural law of reciprocity).

    Law is of necessity ‘written with good manners’ (unloaded, neutral), and verbose, and grammatically strict, in order to prevent intentional misinterpretation.

    Sorry. Just how it is. It’s not my job to write wisdom in petty prose of proletarians. It’s my job to develop the logic, grammar and vocabulary of Natural Law so that we can extend the prohibition on fraud and harm from goods and services to information (speech).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 09:49:00 UTC

  • “Intelligence creates an environment of maturity, respect and purpose. The lack

    —“Intelligence creates an environment of maturity, respect and purpose. The lack of intelligence results in chaotic competition for anything and everything.” — Tom Watt


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 09:16:00 UTC

  • constitution was the best yet written, because it attempted to create a “third w

    https://www.quora.com/Do-all-Americans-realise-how-lucky-they-are-For-all-their-shortcomings-they-have-a-prosperous-beautiful-land-with-many-different-ideas-and-people-The-Constitution-which-protects-their-rights-e-g-free-speech-which-is/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=ffbf12ed&srid=u4QvOur constitution was the best yet written, because it attempted to create a “third way” alternative to church or state under Natural Law – a middle class country – but it has been fairly easy to circumvent for the simple reason that the supreme court has no vehicle for ‘returning law to the congress’, and therefore can legislate from the bench. As far as I know the basis of common law is optimum (natural law of tort) and the level of detail in continental law is less open to circumvention.

    Our political system is outright bad, with parties, prime ministers and a monarch empirically superior by all the evidence.

    While conceived as a loose collection of states like europe, we have failed to preserve the independence of the states, and the presidency, and the majority election of the president, has only reinforce that problem.

    As such we have a continent-wide empire where everyone is always angry because each state or region has a different culture with different social, economic, political, and strategic demands.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-20 20:31:00 UTC

  • More on English vs German

    Q: What would English look like if it followed the grammar of German? by Vlad Andreev (From Quora) Have you geheard, we should to the German Grammar overswitch? That have i already yesterday gemade. The German Grammar could, itself tofirst, strange sound, but you will perhaps discover that it not so difficult is. It is yes only a Matter of Wordorder… wait but. Have i “geheard” gesaid? I estimate once, that there also other Factors be could. Firstens, the Verbs. The Present Perfect in English is not the same as the Perfekt Timeform on German. On German, corresponds she to the Simple Past on English, in the last Years becomes but also increasingly employed in order all past Forms to indicate. The perfective Aspect, on German, is with the Gerundform geformed. So, now say we Things so like “gefound” and “geshopped” and “atgelooked”. Wait, “atgelooked”? Right. Whereas on the old Language, we Things “looked at”, now we Things “atlook”. This is a separable Verb, so the Gerundmarker becomes in the Word insidegeinserted. Secondens, the Nouns. Each has a grammatical Gender, and it must with the Pronouns match in anaphoric Situations (in this Answer, i want it to avoid, new Morphemes to withupcome, or from the Old English to borrow: so it’s called the Phrase, not þēos Phrase, is but still toreferred as she). If one with the Goal operates, new Words not towardstoadd, and the existing Inflections to reuse (“in the last Years”, not “in the lasts Years”, because the adjectival Plural unmarked in English is), then are we already more or less there. Some Littlehoods remain: Questionwordorder, Compoundnouns, certain Verbconjugationdetails and a few more, but in the Principle should you on Denglish communicate can. Much Luck! ANOTHER: English: Here is a little demonstration of what English would roughly feel like if it had essentially the same grammar as German. Word order would perhaps be the most difficult for modern English speakers trying to understand it, but word inflections would be particularly hard to produce correctly, especially because of noun genders. English with German grammar: Here is a little demonstration thereof, how English itself rough feelen would, if it in’t General thesame Grammar hadde, as German. That wordorder weré perhaps the biggest Understandingdifficulty for Speaker of’t modernen English, but Wordendings weren particular difficult correct to producen, before all because of thes’ gendern’s thes’ nounen’s. German with English grammar: Hier ist ein klein demonstration von wie Englisch ungefährlich würd fühl, wenn es hatte wesentlichlich de selb grammatik wie Deutsch. Wortfolge war vielleicht de meist schwierig für modern Englisch sprechers versuchend zu verstehen es, aber wort endungs würd sein besonders schwer zu reproduzier richtiglich, vor all wegen von substantiv geschlechts. German: Hier ist eine kleine Demonstration davon, wie sich Englisch ungefähr anfühlen würde, wenn es im Wesentlichen dieselbe Grammatik hätte, wie Deutsch. Die Wortstellung wäre vielleicht die größte Verständnisschwierigkeit für Sprecher des modernen Englisch, aber Wortendungen wären besonders schwer richtig zu reproduzieren, vor allem wegen der Geschlechter der Substantive. Apr 20, 2018 9:54am

  • More on English vs German

    Q: What would English look like if it followed the grammar of German? by Vlad Andreev (From Quora) Have you geheard, we should to the German Grammar overswitch? That have i already yesterday gemade. The German Grammar could, itself tofirst, strange sound, but you will perhaps discover that it not so difficult is. It is yes only a Matter of Wordorder… wait but. Have i “geheard” gesaid? I estimate once, that there also other Factors be could. Firstens, the Verbs. The Present Perfect in English is not the same as the Perfekt Timeform on German. On German, corresponds she to the Simple Past on English, in the last Years becomes but also increasingly employed in order all past Forms to indicate. The perfective Aspect, on German, is with the Gerundform geformed. So, now say we Things so like “gefound” and “geshopped” and “atgelooked”. Wait, “atgelooked”? Right. Whereas on the old Language, we Things “looked at”, now we Things “atlook”. This is a separable Verb, so the Gerundmarker becomes in the Word insidegeinserted. Secondens, the Nouns. Each has a grammatical Gender, and it must with the Pronouns match in anaphoric Situations (in this Answer, i want it to avoid, new Morphemes to withupcome, or from the Old English to borrow: so it’s called the Phrase, not þēos Phrase, is but still toreferred as she). If one with the Goal operates, new Words not towardstoadd, and the existing Inflections to reuse (“in the last Years”, not “in the lasts Years”, because the adjectival Plural unmarked in English is), then are we already more or less there. Some Littlehoods remain: Questionwordorder, Compoundnouns, certain Verbconjugationdetails and a few more, but in the Principle should you on Denglish communicate can. Much Luck! ANOTHER: English: Here is a little demonstration of what English would roughly feel like if it had essentially the same grammar as German. Word order would perhaps be the most difficult for modern English speakers trying to understand it, but word inflections would be particularly hard to produce correctly, especially because of noun genders. English with German grammar: Here is a little demonstration thereof, how English itself rough feelen would, if it in’t General thesame Grammar hadde, as German. That wordorder weré perhaps the biggest Understandingdifficulty for Speaker of’t modernen English, but Wordendings weren particular difficult correct to producen, before all because of thes’ gendern’s thes’ nounen’s. German with English grammar: Hier ist ein klein demonstration von wie Englisch ungefährlich würd fühl, wenn es hatte wesentlichlich de selb grammatik wie Deutsch. Wortfolge war vielleicht de meist schwierig für modern Englisch sprechers versuchend zu verstehen es, aber wort endungs würd sein besonders schwer zu reproduzier richtiglich, vor all wegen von substantiv geschlechts. German: Hier ist eine kleine Demonstration davon, wie sich Englisch ungefähr anfühlen würde, wenn es im Wesentlichen dieselbe Grammatik hätte, wie Deutsch. Die Wortstellung wäre vielleicht die größte Verständnisschwierigkeit für Sprecher des modernen Englisch, aber Wortendungen wären besonders schwer richtig zu reproduzieren, vor allem wegen der Geschlechter der Substantive. Apr 20, 2018 9:54am

  • IN PRISONS AS WELL – THE BOTTOM DETERMINES THE MEDIAN —“We definitely don’t un

    IN PRISONS AS WELL – THE BOTTOM DETERMINES THE MEDIAN

    —“We definitely don’t understand the entire package as far as how IQ explains the process leading to an inmate engaging in misbehavior,” Morris said. “It’s more about IQ playing a role, and that it’s not only about a particular person’s IQ, but it’s about collective IQ in an environment of confinement.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-20 16:14:00 UTC