Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • “If masculinity were truly toxic what does that say about the 53.2 million copie

    —“If masculinity were truly toxic what does that say about the 53.2 million copies of “50 Shades of Grey” purchased by females?”—James Santagata

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 18:42:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM IN ANGLISH (brilliant!) by Ely Harman Ownerken: the thoughtlore

    PROPERTARIANISM IN ANGLISH (brilliant!)

    by Ely Harman

    Ownerken: the thoughtlore of western Lordcraft.

    A quick guide in Anglish (English with no outlandish words, but only theedish words.)

    Ownerken is a branch of worldken that has to do with the beholding and understanding of fellowship, trust, law, and all the dealings of lords, free men, thralls, and even women.

    Ownerken is not only thoughtlore, but worldken, because like all worldken it begins by guessing at beholdings and then working through them to see if they are untrue. You cannot show a beholding true with a workthrough because some other workthrough (yet undone) may show it untrue. But if a workthrough shows it untrue then that is settled and the beholding must be thrown out. In this way, our beholdings get better with time and become knowledge (true belief) and understanding even though we can never be sure that our beholdings are best or that our knowledge or understanding are flawless.

    Some basic workthroughs from ownerken are:

    Oneness: is each thing one thing, or many? If many, then someone means to fool you and you may kill them.

    Likelihood: will it work? If not, someone means to fool you and you may kill them.

    Reckoning: are all the gains being reckoned, as well as the losses? If not, someone means to fool you, and you may kill them.

    Give and take: Is someone seeking to take without giving? If so, that’s why they mean to fool you, and you may kill them.

    And others…

    The ownerkenish beholding of ownership is that “what you own” is what you are willing and able to keep, hold and guard. Some freeloaders think ownership is made by doing work and so workers own everything. Other freeriders think ownership is made by blending work with land and then traded, meaning workers do not own most things but a few of the best traders do. But all these foolish knaves are wrong because warriors can take their stuff and all they can do about it is whine, which they do, a lot.

    The first thing to ask is why not just kill you and take your stuff? Well. I might lose something by doing that. There will be struggle and threat. But also, we would not be dealing. And so the boons of dealing would be lost. It may be better to deal than to fight, but only if you will deal fair, only if you can fight well, and only if you have something worth dealing for.

    Men can deal, not deal, or fight. So if you want to deal, you must have something worth dealing for, or else we will not deal. And you must have something to threaten in a fight, or else it may be better for many to just fight you and take your stuff for their own.

    To win fights with other men, men must fight together, side by side, shoulder to shoulder, shield to shield. That means men must trade trust and fellowship because the only thing worth giving trust for is getting it back, the only thing worth giving fellowship for is getting it back.

    To be true fellows, men must have one mind, not on all things, but at least on the weighty ones. Where men are not of one mind they must have a leader to choose for them. Even free men, even lords, will follow a leader if he chooses no less well than them, and/or if the gains from onemindedness outwiegh the losses. And that is why even leaders choose leaders until there is only one high leader between them.

    There is much more to say about ownerken and Lordcraft. But this is the beginning of it…

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 18:17:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/31084197_10156304578912264_66323094

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/31084197_10156304578912264_6632309423563866112_n_10156304578907264.jpg Now If I remember correctly this is from a relatively small sample size of largely white people. I might be wrong, but that’s what I recall. That said, it’s about what we’d expect.

    REMEMBER: IQ = Potential, and personality traits can increase potential and decrease potential.Thorsten Stuart NorgateIt’s a very interesting list, and I’m probably smack in the middle being a law enforcement officer with a history degree. But I’ve met many people who have incredibly high IQs who can barely perform daily tasks, such as getting dressed in the right clothes, or not forgetting to shower – and I’m serious!Apr 22, 2018 10:12amTom WattI consider myself an underachiever. Maybe just autistic.

    No patience for the sciences.

    Law was a thought at one time…got woke.Apr 22, 2018 10:38amBrendan HegartyHow the Hell does one have sub 100 iq and become an EE? Rote learning of some solutions cook book?Apr 22, 2018 11:05amJay BryceAffirmative actionApr 22, 2018 11:11amBrendan HegartyYou still have to GET BY at the minimum.Apr 22, 2018 11:12amJay BryceI don’t think you necessarily do. Get pushed through in school and then get hired by a company who needs to meet diversity goals, put you in a back room counting something.Apr 22, 2018 11:14amJaimz BeelThorsten Stuart NorgateApr 22, 2018 11:28amBill JoslinYa those ranges are.quite broadApr 22, 2018 12:14pmMichael AndradeThe distribution for “social scientists” is… generous… at best. Most modern economists are little more than journalists who are very good at their job (producing lies). Sociologists, anthropologists, and Black/Gender/bullshit studies professors are much, much dumber and far, far more arrogant about how smart they’re told they are.

    Source: 6 years in the most Leftist PhD Economics program in the country.Apr 22, 2018 12:22pmDaniel SeisDo you mean jewish males or how is that distributed over sex/race (your best guess)?Apr 22, 2018 11:02pmNow If I remember correctly this is from a relatively small sample size of largely white people. I might be wrong, but that’s what I recall. That said, it’s about what we’d expect.

    REMEMBER: IQ = Potential, and personality traits can increase potential and decrease potential.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:43:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/31117943_10156303476507264_66892718

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/31117943_10156303476507264_6689271865413730304_n_10156303476502264.jpg Jaimz BeelWas watching some videos yesterday about the spread of the ancient Magyar DNA from present day Syria (and then supposedly later mixed with Uralic) — something like that.Apr 21, 2018 9:24pmDawid WellaFascinating how the great splittings all happened in areas suitable for agricultureApr 22, 2018 2:30am

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 20:28:00 UTC

  • Support for Natural Law

    by Daniel Roland Anderson And we have a mechanism for correcting non-correspondence of the constitution with natural law: the Amendment process—which won’t work in our current demographic situation. Do you know many judges you’d trust to implement Natural Law over the plain text of the document? I don’t. When I hear a “constitutionalist” go on about Natural Law, it’s 99.9% ignorant blather. Curt is the first guy in years to use the term Natural Law in a way that doesn’t make me want to punch someone. I suspect Curt provides for decidability whereas others use Natural Law to stand in for “whatever I think is good right now.” Curt has done great things for the Common Law that many constitutionalists would throw out with the bathwater if judicial abuse of discretion. (CD: Bingo)

  • Support for Natural Law

    by Daniel Roland Anderson And we have a mechanism for correcting non-correspondence of the constitution with natural law: the Amendment process—which won’t work in our current demographic situation. Do you know many judges you’d trust to implement Natural Law over the plain text of the document? I don’t. When I hear a “constitutionalist” go on about Natural Law, it’s 99.9% ignorant blather. Curt is the first guy in years to use the term Natural Law in a way that doesn’t make me want to punch someone. I suspect Curt provides for decidability whereas others use Natural Law to stand in for “whatever I think is good right now.” Curt has done great things for the Common Law that many constitutionalists would throw out with the bathwater if judicial abuse of discretion. (CD: Bingo)

  • The Feminine Mask

    The Feminine Mask—“Psychopathic personality is also consistently documented more often in men versus women; in fact, the ratio has been as high as 20:1.However, new research suggests that some of the difference between men and women may not be in the existence of deceitful, manipulative, and exploitive personality traits but in the expression of them. Specifically, these researchers found that women may be more likely to express these personality deficits through behaviors that are typically associated with, and diagnosed as, other mental illnesses.For example, these researchers found overlap between some of the symptoms such as histrionic personality disorder or borderline personality disorder. (link is external) A woman whose extreme fear of abandonment leads her to periodic outbursts of rage over real or imagined transgressions, flips between seeing her significant other as either completely perfect or totally evil, or who has to constantly be the center of attention (link is external) certainly isn’t who we think of when we think of the classic psychopath. But she may be just as incapable of true empathy, and just as manipulative and deceitful, as the callous, unemotional male.”—

  • The Feminine Mask

    The Feminine Mask—“Psychopathic personality is also consistently documented more often in men versus women; in fact, the ratio has been as high as 20:1.However, new research suggests that some of the difference between men and women may not be in the existence of deceitful, manipulative, and exploitive personality traits but in the expression of them. Specifically, these researchers found that women may be more likely to express these personality deficits through behaviors that are typically associated with, and diagnosed as, other mental illnesses.For example, these researchers found overlap between some of the symptoms such as histrionic personality disorder or borderline personality disorder. (link is external) A woman whose extreme fear of abandonment leads her to periodic outbursts of rage over real or imagined transgressions, flips between seeing her significant other as either completely perfect or totally evil, or who has to constantly be the center of attention (link is external) certainly isn’t who we think of when we think of the classic psychopath. But she may be just as incapable of true empathy, and just as manipulative and deceitful, as the callous, unemotional male.”—

  • Progressives are the Establishment

    by Ely Harman Progressives are the “establishment.” They are not “rebels” they are not “marginalized.” They are the powers that be and they use their institutional power, which they weild through something like 95% of all instititions to crush dissent, to shut down opposition, to silence criticism, and to squelch discussion. They also use their power only for bad, dysgenia, parasitism, lies fraud, corruption, degeneracy, weakness worship, mediocrity, stagnation, decay, uglification, everything that is mean, gross, defective, foul, or inferior and nothing that is excellent, good, beautiful, truthful or pure.

  • Progressives are the Establishment

    by Ely Harman Progressives are the “establishment.” They are not “rebels” they are not “marginalized.” They are the powers that be and they use their institutional power, which they weild through something like 95% of all instititions to crush dissent, to shut down opposition, to silence criticism, and to squelch discussion. They also use their power only for bad, dysgenia, parasitism, lies fraud, corruption, degeneracy, weakness worship, mediocrity, stagnation, decay, uglification, everything that is mean, gross, defective, foul, or inferior and nothing that is excellent, good, beautiful, truthful or pure.