—“Do lions and hyenas think of love, markets or hate? no. but that does not stop them from competing for and defending territory.”— Neil A. Bucklew
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-06 23:39:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1004507996326694913
photos_and_videos/your_posts/34600386_10156409002247264_6252213906018664448_o_10156409002237264.jpg Radu M OleniucThere are a lot of discoveries in Romania and in the East in the recent years that were unaccounted for in most of the history books. Pestera cu Oase, for example, a cave in Romania is just being discovered by the scientific community.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8ZTp-gs-OkJun 07, 2018 9:06pm photos_and_videos/your_posts/34636649_10156409002317264_5069663200153174016_n_10156409002312264.jpg photos_and_videos/your_posts/34507538_10156409002457264_908564227973709824_o_10156409002447264.jpg —“the earliest populations of the Near East derived around half their ancestry from a ‘Basal Eurasian’ lineage that had little if any Neanderthal admixture and that separated from other non-African lineages before their separation from each other. The first farmers of the southern Levant (Israel and Jordan) and Zagros Mountains (Iran) were strongly genetically differentiated, and each descended from local hunter–gatherers. By the time of the Bronze Age, these two populations and Anatolian-related farmers had mixed with each other and with the hunter–gatherers of Europe to greatly reduce genetic differentiation. The impact of the Near Eastern farmers extended beyond the Near East: farmers related to those of Anatolia spread westward into Europe; farmers related to those of the Levant spread southward into East Africa; farmers related to those of Iran spread northward into the Eurasian steppe; and people related to both the early farmers of Iran and to the pastoralists of the Eurasian steppe spread eastward into South Asia.”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-06 23:07:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/34600386_10156409002247264_6252213906018664448_o_10156409002237264.jpg Radu M OleniucThere are a lot of discoveries in Romania and in the East in the recent years that were unaccounted for in most of the history books. Pestera cu Oase, for example, a cave in Romania is just being discovered by the scientific community.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8ZTp-gs-OkJun 07, 2018 9:06pm photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/34636649_10156409002317264_5069663200153174016_n_10156409002312264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/34507538_10156409002457264_908564227973709824_o_10156409002447264.jpg —“the earliest populations of the Near East derived around half their ancestry from a ‘Basal Eurasian’ lineage that had little if any Neanderthal admixture and that separated from other non-African lineages before their separation from each other. The first farmers of the southern Levant (Israel and Jordan) and Zagros Mountains (Iran) were strongly genetically differentiated, and each descended from local hunter–gatherers. By the time of the Bronze Age, these two populations and Anatolian-related farmers had mixed with each other and with the hunter–gatherers of Europe to greatly reduce genetic differentiation. The impact of the Near Eastern farmers extended beyond the Near East: farmers related to those of Anatolia spread westward into Europe; farmers related to those of the Levant spread southward into East Africa; farmers related to those of Iran spread northward into the Eurasian steppe; and people related to both the early farmers of Iran and to the pastoralists of the Eurasian steppe spread eastward into South Asia.”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-06 23:07:00 UTC
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-31/rise-mass-knife-attacks-around-world-shows-problem-isnt-guns-its-peoplehttps://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-31/rise-mass-knife-attacks-around-world-shows-problem-isnt-guns-its-people
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-06 21:10:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-06 21:10:00 UTC
—“Most people don’t seek truth. They seek to feel better. It has taken me many years and some painful lessons to learn this. Think how many enemies we (the Real (scientific) Right) have – people who react emotionally and instinctively against us because we speak truth (or as close as we have been able to get to it) on various topics: the whole Left, the Swamp, all religions. Against these odds we must win. And we will.”—John Mark
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-06 20:17:00 UTC
—“Family is enemy number one of the State”—Tomás Rodriguez Villegas
People forget that the reason women have property rights was so that the church could break up the aristocratic families so that the church (state) could acquire their lands.
By the French revolution, half of the land in europe was dead capital.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-06 20:06:00 UTC
by Neil A. Bucklew The Transcendent? Of course the idea boils down to unclear definitions and murky grammar. and none of us have the time to sort them all out. the transcendent cannot be consumed by definition, but there are plenty of illusions that trigger a neurochemical reaction that is expressed as a transcendent emotion. if the experience is what you want to consume, how is it transcendent? so mindfulness and fasting are more transcendent than illusory gods, who are symbolic guides at best, and ludicrous distractions as worst. What is generally called the transcendent is as you describe, an emotional quest of sorts for some idea that triggers a neurochemical reaction. this is incorrectly named as transcendent and should have a different term. i am of the opinion that this need and behavior is related to atomizing individuality, and the loss of tribal/community connection. our “gods” were our connection to our tribe, throughout time. But there is also a “real’ transcendent. there are real limits and boundaries. identifying and exceeding them could be called transcendent. Self improvement as well as community improvement is simply work done to improve the market value of the individual or community. but it requires identifying and potentially exceeding limitations, opening the path of Caesar, Aristotle, Odin, Zeus, and Tesla to those who dare. Tesla is an example we can look at because he is recent and well documented. There is no silliness involved. He had to eat and sleep just like everyone else, yet he achieved some sort of what i would tentatively call “real transcendent”.
by Neil A. Bucklew The Transcendent? Of course the idea boils down to unclear definitions and murky grammar. and none of us have the time to sort them all out. the transcendent cannot be consumed by definition, but there are plenty of illusions that trigger a neurochemical reaction that is expressed as a transcendent emotion. if the experience is what you want to consume, how is it transcendent? so mindfulness and fasting are more transcendent than illusory gods, who are symbolic guides at best, and ludicrous distractions as worst. What is generally called the transcendent is as you describe, an emotional quest of sorts for some idea that triggers a neurochemical reaction. this is incorrectly named as transcendent and should have a different term. i am of the opinion that this need and behavior is related to atomizing individuality, and the loss of tribal/community connection. our “gods” were our connection to our tribe, throughout time. But there is also a “real’ transcendent. there are real limits and boundaries. identifying and exceeding them could be called transcendent. Self improvement as well as community improvement is simply work done to improve the market value of the individual or community. but it requires identifying and potentially exceeding limitations, opening the path of Caesar, Aristotle, Odin, Zeus, and Tesla to those who dare. Tesla is an example we can look at because he is recent and well documented. There is no silliness involved. He had to eat and sleep just like everyone else, yet he achieved some sort of what i would tentatively call “real transcendent”.
—“If you are trying to a convince a woman of something, you will be better off talking to a wall. Both will not listen or take your advice but at least the wall won’t argue with you.” — Old Adage. Um. My advice is different. (a) You cannot compel women to do much of anything other than ‘fit in’, ‘signal’, and ‘advance her offspring’. (b) You can only say ‘no’ to what will negatively affect you, or that you cannot afford, or that you are unable to do. In other words, argue possibility with women not preference or good. Otherwise you are attacking her intuition not her reason. A woman’s intuition (impulse) is not only unavoidable but her identity. If you argue against it then you are in fact criticizing HER, not the idea. Ergo, avoid doing so. My philosophy with women is to help them be all they can be, just like we should our children. And to leave decisions to them that do not REQUIRE a ‘no’ from you (man) because it is inter-temporally dangerous, economically, or physically costly for you.