Form: Question

  • WHY IS POLITICAL ECONOMY ONCE AGAIN CENTER STAGE, WHILE MONETARY AND FISCAL POLI

    WHY IS POLITICAL ECONOMY ONCE AGAIN CENTER STAGE, WHILE MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICY CLAIM LESS ATTENTION?

    Because it’s become obvious that democracy, permanent growth, equality, diversity, and the end of political innovation were false assumptions.

    Tribalism has, does, and will always rule.

    Perhaps academia should focus more on institutions of cooperation rather than optimum choices for all.

    MONOPOLY IS A BAD IDEA EVERYWHERE IN NATURE THAT WE FIND IT.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-20 08:57:00 UTC

  • DOES THE WORLD LOOK LIKE WITHOUT FAMILIES? What does that mean for politics?

    http://www.newgeography.com/content/003133-the-rise-post-familialism-humanitys-futureWHAT DOES THE WORLD LOOK LIKE WITHOUT FAMILIES?

    What does that mean for politics?


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-12 10:53:00 UTC

  • (allergies) What preservatives or chemistry are in Powdered Sugar? Also known as

    (allergies)

    What preservatives or chemistry are in Powdered Sugar? Also known as confectioners sugar.

    Couldn’t figure out what it was. But it put me down hard for hours. Just coming out of it. Same effect as whatever is in coconut.

    One more thing off the menu.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-09 17:02:00 UTC

  • Is it just me, or did Microsoft taint the Metro style UI so badly that it’s dead

    Is it just me, or did Microsoft taint the Metro style UI so badly that it’s dead?

    I realize that flatness is fashionable (as resolution increases it’s only natural). But the metro UI, at least to me, reads as synonym for failure.

    I’m overly sensitive to this stuff. So maybe it’s just me.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-07 04:04:00 UTC

  • HUMAN BEHAVIOR QUESTION: LOTTOCRATIC BUSINESS PROCESSES? If you have worked with

    HUMAN BEHAVIOR QUESTION: LOTTOCRATIC BUSINESS PROCESSES?

    If you have worked with me before, you know that I have a sort of personal commitment to eliminating overhead bureaucracy and empowering the people who actually do the work. I’ve found that it’s better to distribute management functions to a large number of people, each of whom does just a little bit of it.

    The side effects are fascinating. First, you educate a lot of people about how to run a business. If you rotate these duties you basically train most of your staff in how to operate the boring but necessary parts. Second, it makes it impossible for people to use their management duties to obscure information. Third, it prevents stagnation and encourages innovation. People want to eliminate these little process functions rather than expand them. So they tend to invent ways of making them go away.

    TIME CARDS AND EXPENSES AS LOTTOCRACY

    I have been toying with the idea of lottocratically assigning timesheet approvals around a services company. That is, anyone with one year of experience or more gets X randomly assigned timesheets and expense reports to review and approve. Most of what is accomplished by approvals is error checking. If accounting, upon entering and posting, approves it too, your score goes up, and if they reject it your score goes down.

    Now you might think this is crazy. But I’m pretty sure, that if I made it an option. Most people in any company would want to do it. Particularly the less experienced people. And the senior people would avoid it at all costs.

    People would want to do it because it increases Sovereignty. They are more in control, and participating more in their environment. And from my perspective, an informed and participatory employee is happier one, who brags about his or her job to others. Which helps recruiting. And customers ‘SENSE’ it. And that ‘sense’ sells.

    I’M WONDERING WHAT YOU THINK?


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-07 01:19:00 UTC

  • WHY ISN’T REDISTRIBUTION SIMPLY CANNIBALISM? Interesting

    WHY ISN’T REDISTRIBUTION SIMPLY CANNIBALISM?

    Interesting.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-09-25 07:54:00 UTC

  • WAS MILLGRAM WRONG?

    http://www.psmag.com/health/electric-schlock-65377/BUT WAS MILLGRAM WRONG?

    http://psmag.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=2a3f99f9e81d48228ea39f9a4&id=356e2d99e0&e=1d54207add


    Source date (UTC): 2013-09-17 05:27:00 UTC

  • How many axis can these disciplines be ordered by? Mathematics Computer Science

    How many axis can these disciplines be ordered by?

    Mathematics

    Computer Science

    Physics

    Engineering

    Economics

    THOUGHTS

    Causal Density

    Susceptibility to mathematical representation

    Testability

    Computabiity

    Platonic vs Real

    ???


    Source date (UTC): 2013-09-14 15:53:00 UTC

  • WERE THE FIRST EGYPTIANS?

    http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/469/2159/20130395WHO WERE THE FIRST EGYPTIANS?


    Source date (UTC): 2013-09-10 23:01:00 UTC

  • PUZZLES vs PROBLEMS : PLATONISM vs NATURALISM What is the difference between a p

    PUZZLES vs PROBLEMS : PLATONISM vs NATURALISM

    What is the difference between a puzzle and a problem?

    What is the difference between tautology and correspondence?

    What is the difference between utility and necessity?

    What is the difference between equivalence and truth?

    What is the difference between platonism and realism?

    What is the difference between mathematics and science?

    From Books To Problems or from Problems To Books?

    Cheers.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-09-05 11:36:00 UTC