So let me get this straight, if they try to prosecute the president for obstruction despite the fact that there was no crime, and nothing to obstruct, meaning he that he was honest, and the entire thing was a setup, then is that when the right wing burns dc to ashes?
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 20:34:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991777939103600640
So let me get this straight, if they try to prosecute the president for obstruction despite the fact that there was no crime, and nothing to obstruct, meaning he that he was honest, and the entire thing was a setup, then is that when the right wing burns dc to ashes?
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 16:34:00 UTC
@FriedrichHayek Do you have a link to the lectures on Marx’s knowing he’d failed etc? I can’t remember who gave them. Anything else would be great as well. My followers would love it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 11:25:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991639843913584640
Is that video of Obama singing “I’m A Lumberjack” for real?
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 00:45:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991478772204556288
Is that video of Obama singing “I’m A Lumberjack” for real?
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-01 20:45:00 UTC
As far as I know the IE peoples separated into european and indo-iranian branches, and my understanding via Armstrong is that it was because the eastern peoples ‘left’ (created a diaspora) because they could not compete against the west but they could compete south and east. As far as I know (from the record) The Indo-Iranian religion was polytheistic. As far as I know, zoroaster lived closer to 1000bc (earlier), even if the religion was formalized (like most were) centuries later. As far as I know zoroaster and his work were addressed to the iranian branch, and to no small degree, to intentionally cause conflcit between the iranian and indian branches. As far as I know the indian version of religion is the closest to our EASTERN ancestral religion. But again the western ancestral and the eastern ancestral differed greatly in that in the western, men traded with and could often defeat the gods, where in the eastern version, men were dependent upon or submissive to the gods. The difference is that IE’s disappeared through interbreeding with the peoples of india, the persians (iranians) were boxed in between india and the semites, Although they seem to have preserved most of their genetic independence until the arab conquest. And the west were isolated by the urals, mediterranean, black sea and alps, as were india and the chinese.
As far as I know the IE peoples separated into european and indo-iranian branches, and my understanding via Armstrong is that it was because the eastern peoples ‘left’ (created a diaspora) because they could not compete against the west but they could compete south and east. As far as I know (from the record) The Indo-Iranian religion was polytheistic. As far as I know, zoroaster lived closer to 1000bc (earlier), even if the religion was formalized (like most were) centuries later. As far as I know zoroaster and his work were addressed to the iranian branch, and to no small degree, to intentionally cause conflcit between the iranian and indian branches. As far as I know the indian version of religion is the closest to our EASTERN ancestral religion. But again the western ancestral and the eastern ancestral differed greatly in that in the western, men traded with and could often defeat the gods, where in the eastern version, men were dependent upon or submissive to the gods. The difference is that IE’s disappeared through interbreeding with the peoples of india, the persians (iranians) were boxed in between india and the semites, Although they seem to have preserved most of their genetic independence until the arab conquest. And the west were isolated by the urals, mediterranean, black sea and alps, as were india and the chinese.
GENGHIS KHAN VS CRUSOE What provides genghis kahn with the incentive to (a) let you live, (b) keep your things (c) let you remain free of slavery (d) Let you keep a portion of your production? It’s the inverse of the Crusoe’s Island thought experiment. Historically, the model that we evolved with, is an evenly distributed but scarce population preying on one another to obtain territory, women, and goods. How do you develop mutually beneficial cooperation in the historical (existential) rather than pessimistic (Kahn) or optimistic (Crusoe) models? Genghis Khan <———- Steppe ———> Crusoe
GENGHIS KHAN VS CRUSOE What provides genghis kahn with the incentive to (a) let you live, (b) keep your things (c) let you remain free of slavery (d) Let you keep a portion of your production? It’s the inverse of the Crusoe’s Island thought experiment. Historically, the model that we evolved with, is an evenly distributed but scarce population preying on one another to obtain territory, women, and goods. How do you develop mutually beneficial cooperation in the historical (existential) rather than pessimistic (Kahn) or optimistic (Crusoe) models? Genghis Khan <———- Steppe ———> Crusoe
GENGHIS KHAN VS CRUSOE
What provides genghis kahn with the incentive to (a) let you live, (b) keep your things (c) let you remain free of slavery (d) Let you keep a portion of your production?
It’s the inverse of the Crusoe’s Island thought experiment.
Historically, the model that we evolved with, is an evenly distributed but scarce population preying on one another to obtain territory, women, and goods.
How do you develop mutually beneficial cooperation in the historical (existential) rather than pessimistic (Kahn) or optimistic (Crusoe) models?
Genghis Khan <———- Steppe ———> Crusoe
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 13:43:00 UTC