Form: Question

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544796934 Timestamp) Within the subject of Face vs Truth, what is the difference between Loyalty and Duty?

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544796934 Timestamp) Within the subject of Face vs Truth, what is the difference between Loyalty and Duty?

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545151057 Timestamp) PROPERTARIANISM AND STOICISM VS BUDDHISM? —“We ought to discuss Buddhism (I am a Buddhist) and Propertarianism (I’ve discussed various matters with Curt Doolittle) in the future.”— Andrew Taylor by The Propertarian Institute It’s not complicated. Buddhism evolved out of hinduism’s ‘spiritualism’ and because of that started out very similar to stoicism but with less empirical names of phenomenon, and was largely a way of developing mindfulness by way of REJECTING the world. Stoicism began as self authoring and was very close to the then-greco-roman empirical method. It’s purpose was to facilitate ACTION in the world, despite our emotions. Stoicism was incorporated into christianity when the stoic schools were forcibly closed by the christian hordes. Buddhism was adopted widely but evolved into a religion rather than a discipline. This has to do largely with the means of spreading stoicism (middle class schools) vs the means of spreading buddhism (common folk under direction of independent teachers, and eventually out of political utility as in japan. ) Where buddhism is pacific and heroic, stoicism is martial and heroic. Otherwise they are similar. My suspicion is that stoicism would have turned into a religion like stoicism if it had not been suppressed by the jews, christians, and the byzantine (greek) re-conquest of rome.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545151057 Timestamp) PROPERTARIANISM AND STOICISM VS BUDDHISM? —“We ought to discuss Buddhism (I am a Buddhist) and Propertarianism (I’ve discussed various matters with Curt Doolittle) in the future.”— Andrew Taylor by The Propertarian Institute It’s not complicated. Buddhism evolved out of hinduism’s ‘spiritualism’ and because of that started out very similar to stoicism but with less empirical names of phenomenon, and was largely a way of developing mindfulness by way of REJECTING the world. Stoicism began as self authoring and was very close to the then-greco-roman empirical method. It’s purpose was to facilitate ACTION in the world, despite our emotions. Stoicism was incorporated into christianity when the stoic schools were forcibly closed by the christian hordes. Buddhism was adopted widely but evolved into a religion rather than a discipline. This has to do largely with the means of spreading stoicism (middle class schools) vs the means of spreading buddhism (common folk under direction of independent teachers, and eventually out of political utility as in japan. ) Where buddhism is pacific and heroic, stoicism is martial and heroic. Otherwise they are similar. My suspicion is that stoicism would have turned into a religion like stoicism if it had not been suppressed by the jews, christians, and the byzantine (greek) re-conquest of rome.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545690102 Timestamp) ( What Happened to Adam Voight? )

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545690102 Timestamp) ( What Happened to Adam Voight? )

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1546366269 Timestamp) THE MALE COGNITIVE LOAD? by Simon Ström How is the male cognitive load operationalized? It isn’t as easily because of greater variation and division of labor among the male population. But the most basic load to which males are predisposed to carry should be the dominance hierarchy and male peer group. It probably goes a lot deeper and varies with class and IQ, and I bet there are actually evolved, discrete, ‘archetypical male clusters’ beyond the random, gaussian normal distribution of psychometric traits traits, (and the male-female division common to all of the animal kingdom.) Whereas the female cognitive load varies in sophistication along the class or IQ axis, I think the lifecycle of the reproductive bottleneck-sex limits the evolutionary plasticity of its physiological cognitive load. Men are not only biologically expendable but also evolutionarily plastic and differentiated along multiple axes of skills and ‘loads’.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1546719526 Timestamp) IS IT THAT SIMPLE? Seems to be a common observation that men informationally limited and insensitive and women are informationally oversaturated and hypersensitive, while we both have about the same limits on calculating decidability. You hear this a lot: –“Men are stupid and women are crazy”– But honestly it’s just cognitive structure. The drawers of the male mind and relative insensitivity, and the nets of the female mind and relative hypersensitivity. Evolution must have had a lot of fun rolling up those characters sheets…. Seriously. I wonder how many times Zeus rolled the dice before he said “Wow, do ya’ know how much fun we’re gonna have watching THIS pairing of the sexes? We are gonna be entertained for the next million years!!!” The gods have a mischievous sense of humor.

  • Curt Doolittle shared a photo.

    (FB 1547142874 Timestamp) Does anyone know what model of car this is? I mean, ditch the rally interior, but otherwise I think that’s probably a pretty awesome summer and snow car.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1547131714 Timestamp) QUESTIONS: FREE MARKET VS RECIPROCAL CAPITALISM by ‎Noah J Revoy‎ Let’s compare the trope “Free Markets” of Free Market Capitalism with “Reciprocal Markets”, of Reciprocal Market Capitalism. Or stated differently, lets compare the IDEAL good of free markets regardless of externality – particularly knowledge, fixed, cultural, and genetic capital, with the MEASURED good of reciprocal markets under rule of law that prohibits the consumption privatization, or destruction, of such precious capital. QUESTIONS: 1. How would you describe the differences between Reciprocal Capitalism as proposed under a propertarianism model and Free Market Capitalism as promoted by libertarians?

    1. What problems does Reciprocal Capitalism solve (vs Free Markets)?

    2. What are the libertarians missing?

    3. How could Reciprocal Capitalism help solve some of the moderate lefts concerns about markets?

    4. Both the left and the right have problems with the current “Free Market Capitalism” as practiced in the west. (Free market is a poor descriptor as its not truly free and often not even a real set of markets).