Curt Doolittle

Form: Question

  • QUESTION: —“Curt I have a question for you. Do you think that there is any pos

    QUESTION: —“Curt I have a question for you. Do you think that there is any possibility of a tyrant getting in charge of the USA should it descend into civil war for separation? Or do we think this can be done by democratic processes in place? The latter one I think realistically doesn’t have a chance.”—

    There is a possibility of democratic process *IF* we propose a solution that is a superior alternative to certain conflict. This is what I hope to do. But the public won’t accept that until the conflict is certain. Which will happen soon.

    Any democrat is by definition a tyrant, because any rule by legislation rather than rule by law of reciprocity is by definition despotism.

    My hope, and most probable is a military takeover of the government. The problem is that the military needs something to enforce. So we must provide them with the market demand (up rising), moral license (to prevent chaos and civil war), and solution (that they can enforce to maintain the peace).

    We will need to act before the election. That’s all I can tell you. And that is why I’m working so hard to get enough done to provide that solution – at the last minute.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 17:21:00 UTC

  • WHY (((UNDERMINING)))? Destroying trust. Why?

    WHY (((UNDERMINING)))?

    Destroying trust. Why?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 14:38:00 UTC

  • Why do women consider emotions a cost? Example: “These asymmetrical moral suppor

    Why do women consider emotions a cost? Example: “These asymmetrical moral support relations may be instantiated in many different ways” …Asymmetrical accumulation of cellular damage may be instantiated in many different ways. That’s why men die earlier. How are they equivalent?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227509807779840

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227509027651584

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    WHY MISOGYNY?
    Presumption: Why do women confuse rejection, disapproval, restraint from reciprocity with emotional disapproval (hate)? Why do women not argue truth or falsehood, reciprocity vs reciprocity? Why do women engage in endless conflict by Undermining … vs Exchange?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227509027651584

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    WHY MISOGYNY?
    Presumption: Why do women confuse rejection, disapproval, restraint from reciprocity with emotional disapproval (hate)? Why do women not argue truth or falsehood, reciprocity vs reciprocity? Why do women engage in endless conflict by Undermining … vs Exchange?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227509027651584

  • WHY MISOGYNY? Presumption: Why do women confuse rejection, disapproval, restrain

    WHY MISOGYNY?
    Presumption: Why do women confuse rejection, disapproval, restraint from reciprocity with emotional disapproval (hate)? Why do women not argue truth or falsehood, reciprocity vs reciprocity? Why do women engage in endless conflict by Undermining … vs Exchange?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227509027651584

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227508214030336

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    NOTES ON DOWN GIRL – THREAD @kate_manne
    Short Answer:
    Q: “When will women be human? When?” asked feminist legal theorist, Catharine A. MacKinnon, in a 1999 essay.
    A: When Truth, Productive and Accumulative, and Eugenic, take precedence over Approval, Consumption and Dysgenia.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227508214030336

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    NOTES ON DOWN GIRL – THREAD @kate_manne
    Short Answer:
    Q: “When will women be human? When?” asked feminist legal theorist, Catharine A. MacKinnon, in a 1999 essay.
    A: When Truth, Productive and Accumulative, and Eugenic, take precedence over Approval, Consumption and Dysgenia.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227508214030336

  • OPINIONS? —“Curt, when is the Next Propertarianism Convention?”

    OPINIONS?

    —“Curt, when is the Next Propertarianism Convention?”—

    …

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 20:55:00 UTC

  • WHY IS DEBATING AGAINST P SO UNPLEASANT? Listening to EMJ debate Dutton and Reco

    WHY IS DEBATING AGAINST P SO UNPLEASANT?

    Listening to EMJ debate Dutton and Recognizing the profound difference between Argument and Error, vs Prosecution and Lying. So the reason it’s so painful for others to argue with us, is that if you use operational terms you can’t testify to something you claim you can, then you’re lying or engaging in fraud, while if you’re argument in ideal language instead of operational, you’re just making an error. This is why people hate arguing with us. That not only do we eliminate the ability to engage in sophism, but we don’t call it error, we call it lying, fraud, and deceit.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-11 11:58:00 UTC

  • by @[1013719133:2048:Luke Weinhagen] Is there a relationship between virtue and

    by @[1013719133:2048:Luke Weinhagen]

    Is there a relationship between virtue and freedom? Why might have the Founding Father pursued virtue, rather than explicitly pursue freedom?

    In this context, I am using –

    Virtues: the characteristics and actions of an individual that enable the accumulation of trust.

    Vices: the characteristics and actions of an individual that consume trust.

    Virtue Freedom: The ability to refrain from acting, without the burden of consequence. To be free from compulsion.

    Versus

    Vice Freedom: The ability to act, without the burden of consequence. To be free from costs.

    It is my belief that –

    Virtue empowers the development of freedom, as trust increases the incentive for compulsion decreases.

    Vice is dependent on freedom, social costs of vice are covered by consuming the store of trust.

    Setting the founders aside, you may not agree their pursuit was one of virtue, this is my goal. My alignment with Propertarianism (https://propertarianism.com/) is with its potential to support the pursuit of virtue. For anyone interested in “why” I explore and post much of what I do, creating a structure where a man is free to pursue virtue is that “why”.

    If the goal is freedom for all, the inherent demand this creates is the pursuit of virtue by all.

    And where our definitions of virtue conflict with each other, meaning reciprocity is not possible, is where I believe we should be seeking separation rather than trying to impose our definitions on each other.Updated Oct 9, 2019, 10:24 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-09 22:24:00 UTC

  • Q: Other Writers: Which Archetype is Joker? How old is that Archetype? HINT: If

    Q: Other Writers: Which Archetype is Joker? How old is that Archetype?

    HINT: If you dont now all the archetypes you will make the mistake of conflating them.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 10:05:00 UTC

  • What does monetarily efficient defense mean, and why is that good? And why are y

    What does monetarily efficient defense mean, and why is that good? And why are you claiming america and finland were not governments or states?

    (Don’t use words like ‘disprove, premise, and conclusion’ (logic) when you’re argument is by analogy.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 00:10:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180998721963737088

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180971864316928001

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180971864316928001

  • What evidence do you have that the state cannot end digital shares in digital ne

    What evidence do you have that the state cannot end digital shares in digital networks?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:30:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180822695988121600

    Reply addressees: @NickmhTw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180822192495321088

    IN REPLY TO:

    @nickTw7m47amfe

    @curtdoolittle The state needs to demonstrate that anything it economically touches isn’t poison. Untill that happens? Btc will be the standard by which all others will be measured.
    It can generate as much crypto as it likes. It will “suck-in” the naive. But that’s all.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180822192495321088