WHY DO CHILDREN GO WITH THE MOTHER GIVEN THE DATA?
—-“immature children are the responsibility of the mother in the event of a divorce.” What is the empirical basis for this? Is there a scientific literature showing that when post-breastfeeding prepubescent children are made ward of their fathers, rather than their mothers, they have developmental failures?”—Asab Karpuz
^No. It’s just the evidence from every law code throughout history, that whenever there is a divorce the mother is returned to her father with her children and those assets the father contributed to the marriage.”
Traditionally men take charge of boys during a ritual of some sort (coming of age) where they leave the mother gradually or rapidly and join the world of men. Girls are not treated the same because there is endless demand for them, whether helping mother and siblings, or for sex and fertility, or for assistance in the operation of a household whether single or multi-generational.
The evidence is somewhat the opposite in that single women are deleterious to the development of their children, mostly because they will not accept a male who has influence over her children, where as the opposite is true in that men quickly reform stable households.
So (a) is the mother emotionally stable and not exposing her children to psychological chaos (b) is she sufficiently conscientious to run a household and govern children (c) is she financially stable in and possessed of enough income to run a household, and (d) is she stable enough to restore a two-parent family.
Conversely is the man (a) not anti-social, abusive, addictive, or criminal (c) desirable enough and conscientious enough to attract a woman who can maintain a household, (c) capable of producing sufficient income to afford doing so. In other words, it simply more beneficial to hold a two parent household and men are more likely to rapidly construct one.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 14:42:00 UTC
