(Link to bill’s videos pls. Can’t find them.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 13:44:00 UTC
(Link to bill’s videos pls. Can’t find them.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 13:44:00 UTC
[W]ho produced pseudoscience and sophistry for the academic market? Are women the source of, or market for, academic pseudoscience and sophism? Math: Cantor-Bohr-Einstein, Man: Boas-Freud, Econ: Marx-Mises, Culture: Adorno-Fromm, Philosophy: Derrida, Feminism: Friedan, Neocons: Trotsky-S…-Crystal and Rothbard/Rand are the innovators – but Europeans readily jump on the opportunity for advancement by pseudoscience and sophism.
[W]ho produced pseudoscience and sophistry for the academic market? Are women the source of, or market for, academic pseudoscience and sophism? Math: Cantor-Bohr-Einstein, Man: Boas-Freud, Econ: Marx-Mises, Culture: Adorno-Fromm, Philosophy: Derrida, Feminism: Friedan, Neocons: Trotsky-S…-Crystal and Rothbard/Rand are the innovators – but Europeans readily jump on the opportunity for advancement by pseudoscience and sophism.
Who produced pseudoscience and sophistry for the academic market? Are women the source of, or market for, academic pseudoscience and sophism?
Math: Cantor-Bohr-Einstein, Man: Boas-Freud, Econ: Marx-Mises, Culture: Adorno-Fromm, Philosophy: Derrida, Feminism: Friedan, Neocons: Trotsky-S…-Crystal and Rothbard/Rand are the innovators – but Europeans readily jump on the opportunity for advancement by pseudoscience and sophism.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 12:36:00 UTC
CURT: UNDONE
=========
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle.personal/posts/206449687419859
==================
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle.personal/posts/204852640912897?comment_id=205594074172087&reply_comment_id=206750814056413¬if_id=1581642235521526¬if_t=feed_comment https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle.personal/posts/204852640912897?comment_id=205594074172087&reply_comment_id=206750814056413¬if_id=1581642235521526¬if_t=feed_comment
=================
QUESTION
From Jennifer Dean
—“My background taught me to view everything in terms of personal risk and responsibility. In other words, if you choose to take the risk, you have to take the responsibility for the outcome and just live with it (regardless of whether others were deceptive, made false promises, caused harm, etc.) It seems like that mindset is a big part of what made this country what it is, for both good and ill, and people hold on to that very strongly because they equate it with liberty. They don’t want to ban things that are harmful, or hold others accountable for deceit or coercion because they think it all comes down to personal choice.”—
—“It puzzles me because it’s hard to see how P can work on a practical level in everyday life, when so many people operate in a way that places personal choice above reciprocity. I sense that many advocate for it out of selfishness, or a punitive attitude towards those they perceive as selfish or stupid.”—
—“But I think there’s also a very traditional view among conservatives that the world has to be this way because God judges in the afterlife and until then we just have to turn the other cheek.”—
—“Conservatives and liberals both tend to believe education is the answer. But with the increasing complexity in the world, no one can be smart enough or educated enough to have full informed consent in every decision they make.”—
—“It seems like a big cultural shift is needed before people will understand the real need for reciprocity.”—
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 13:15:00 UTC
Is there any democrat that isn’t trying to buy the election with bread and circuses for the masses?
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 11:13:00 UTC
How long do you think it takes to reorganize an economy subject to externalization of capital intensive industries that employ labor, and all the required suppliers and vendors in each network in the chain of production? It will take at least twelve years.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 16:23:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227267001560838144
Reply addressees: @AMCarbonaro @realDonaldTrump @SecPompeo
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227266581996150784
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227266581996150784
FREE WILL AND DETERMINISM (DETERMINISTIC UNIVERSE)
—“Could you say then that free will is a sort of emergent property of determinism?”—Andy Lunn
Maybe I don’t understand that question enough.
We have will. That’s a fact.
We evolved for graceful failure in exercise of our will – so that is what we interpret as somtimes lacking free will.
We evolved for incremental improvement of our knowledge, and then our will as a consequence.
The degree to which we develop our will (ability) into agency (successful application) depends on ability, experience, training and general knowledge.
So the question isn’t do we have free will, it’s that we evolved will and the capacity to develop agency with it. But we are limited by our knowledge. We do not appear to be otherwise limited simply because we are so good at building tools that extend our sense, perception and action.
Now, within that context, if you mean, that without a deterministic universe (the scientific definition of determinism, not the sophomoric and philosophical definition), then yes, we could never develop agency because there would be no regularity, and without regularity no use for memory, and without memory there would be no use for will reason, or agency.
So in that sense, yes. But only in that sense.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 14:26:00 UTC
https://www.the-sun.com/news/376364/anti-putin-blogger-has-his-throat-slit-in-a-hotel-room-after-vocally-opposing-the-russian-president/OPINIONS PLEASE: ISRAEL, RUSSIA AND NOW SAUDIS USE ASSASSINATIONS TO SILENCE CRITICS.
Opinions on the use of assassination of critics?
https://www.the-sun.com/news/376364/anti-putin-blogger-has-his-throat-slit-in-a-hotel-room-after-vocally-opposing-the-russian-president/Updated Feb 10, 2020, 5:22 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 17:22:00 UTC
question. we have been referring to eprime (eliminating the copula: the verb to be), so that people could use the literature on eprime to understand how to do it. But the problem is, referencing that literature produces strange externalities because of the sequence of thinkers that went into defining it. All of whom amounted to nothing, and eprime was the only meaningful result of their works.
should we just drop eprime reference and instead refer to ‘dropping the copula’ or ‘eliminating the verb to be’ and explaining it?
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 12:32:00 UTC