Form: Outline

  • THE TECHNIQUES: USING SOPHISTRY FOR DECEPTION Our Logical Facility … Reason: .

    THE TECHNIQUES: USING SOPHISTRY FOR DECEPTION

    Our Logical Facility

    … Reason:

    … … 1. theology: wisdom: mythology, literary wisdom literature.

    … … … theo-sophistry: supernatural sophistry, abrahamism

    … … 2. philosophy: choice: realism, naturalism, operationalism, rational choice, reciprocity, completeness

    … … … philo-sophistry: Idealism (platonism), textual interpretation, …. philosophical rationalism.

    … … 3. Law: testimony: by realism, naturalism, operationalism

    … … … legal-sophistry: ( … )

    … … 4. science: testimony: by realism, naturalism, operationalism

    … … … pseudo-science: material sophistry (…)

    … … 5. mathematics:

    … … … pseudo-mathematics: (…)

    TOOLS OF DECEIT

    |Falsehood -> Deceit|:

    … Ignorance -> Error >

    … … Bias->wishful_thiking >

    … … … Loading->framing >

    … … … … Suggestion->Obscurantism >

    … … … … … Sophistry->Idealism (verbal) >

    … … … … … … Magic ->Pseudoscience (physical) >

    … … … … … … … Occult-> Supernaturalism (imaginary) >

    … … … … … … … … Fiction (fabrication) >

    … … … … … … … … … Denial


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 19:19:00 UTC

  • What is Necessary for an optimum Government 0) A militia consisting of sharehold

    What is Necessary for an optimum Government

    0) A militia consisting of shareholders who reciprocally and unconditionally, insure one another’s property-in-toto from the involuntary imposition of costs by both members and non.

    1) A contract (constitution) between those shareholders for that reciprocal insurance, consisting of Rule of law, natural law, universal standing, universal applicability, absence of discretion through strict construction, with a monarchy as a judge (veto) of last resort. And providing for:

    2) A market for polities in which many small polities compete by the production of different commons. (btw: what polities will attract not only the most, but the best women?)

    3) A market for the production of commons within any given polity, by exchange between the classes (those with different reproductive strategies, capabilities, and capital interests)

    4) A Market for the production of goods and services within any given polity by exchanges between individuals and organizations OTHER than those that exclusively produce commons.

    5) A market for the production of generations (marriage) within any given polity, within any given market for commons, within any given market for production of goods, services, and information.

    6) A market for association and cooperation, within the market for polities, the market for commons, the market for private goods, the market for reproduction.

    7) A market for the resolution of disputes over property in toto by application and strict construction of the natural law of cooperation: reciprocity. (Judiciary)

    8) A market for the production of contracts (agreements) in all markets (lawyers)

    9) An insurer of last resort consisting of: A military of last resort, A treasury of last resort (shares in the nation), An insurer against acts of nature, age, and incompetence of last resort.

    Share this:


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 12:20:00 UTC

  • MATURITY OF YOUR POLITICAL PREFERENCE “The Limits of Calculability” 1. Communism

    MATURITY OF YOUR POLITICAL PREFERENCE

    “The Limits of Calculability”

    1. Communism (Family) >

    2. … Socialism (Extended Family) >

    3. … … Classical Liberalism (Community – Market) >

    4. … … … Rule of Law (Nation(People) – Multiple Markets) >

    5. … … … … Military (Territory(International) – Competing Markets).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 08:35:00 UTC

  • Why South America?

    WHY SOUTH AMERICA? 1. Population of natives and slaves. 2. christianity => increase trust to increase cooperation. 3. church => will to power by the weak. 4. church => high rates of reproduction, mysticism to govern them and anti-empiricism and anti-meritocracy to maintain control over them. 5. high rates of reproduction => underclass poverty 6. vast underclass poverty => demand for socialism. 7. demand for socialism => demand for authority instead of rule of law. 8. lack of rule of law = lack of militia to defend against corruption under rule of law by threat of overthrow. This is the cycle of poverty, dysgenia, corruption, and stagnation under the church – a cycle only broken in northern europe by aristocratic manorialism to suppress the growth of the underclass, and the subsequent middle class restoration of trade, and the subsequent restoration of rule of law, and the subsequent wealth, and the subsequent literacy, and the subsequent break with the parasitism mysticism and dysgenia of the church, and the subsequent conquest of the world, and the subsequent industrial, scientific, technical, medical, and informational revolutions, and the subsequent dragging of mankind – kicking and screaming against the european aristocracy – out of their addiction to ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the victimhood of nature all but hostile to life. Then the academy, which had evolved as an extension of the church to teach church dogma, shifted from mythology, theology, and the granting of indulgences to alternate history, pseudoscience, and the granting of useless diplomas under the second jewish attack on western civilization.

  • Why South America?

    WHY SOUTH AMERICA? 1. Population of natives and slaves. 2. christianity => increase trust to increase cooperation. 3. church => will to power by the weak. 4. church => high rates of reproduction, mysticism to govern them and anti-empiricism and anti-meritocracy to maintain control over them. 5. high rates of reproduction => underclass poverty 6. vast underclass poverty => demand for socialism. 7. demand for socialism => demand for authority instead of rule of law. 8. lack of rule of law = lack of militia to defend against corruption under rule of law by threat of overthrow. This is the cycle of poverty, dysgenia, corruption, and stagnation under the church – a cycle only broken in northern europe by aristocratic manorialism to suppress the growth of the underclass, and the subsequent middle class restoration of trade, and the subsequent restoration of rule of law, and the subsequent wealth, and the subsequent literacy, and the subsequent break with the parasitism mysticism and dysgenia of the church, and the subsequent conquest of the world, and the subsequent industrial, scientific, technical, medical, and informational revolutions, and the subsequent dragging of mankind – kicking and screaming against the european aristocracy – out of their addiction to ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the victimhood of nature all but hostile to life. Then the academy, which had evolved as an extension of the church to teach church dogma, shifted from mythology, theology, and the granting of indulgences to alternate history, pseudoscience, and the granting of useless diplomas under the second jewish attack on western civilization.

  • Moral Foundations (instincts)

    (HERD): SOCIALIST – EQUALITARIAN – FEMALE(Consumption – Short Term – Anti-Property)Offer: Care, Affection, Sex. Weapon: Undermining, Disloyalty.

    1) Care/Harm: Redistributive Property (Welfare, Charity, Land reform)

    And; 2) Fairness/Cheating: Proportionality. Cooperative Property (Sharing, Antitrust laws, Sport rules)(SOLITARY HUNTER): LIBERTARIAN – EGALITARIAN – ASCENDENT MALE(Production – Medium Term – Property – Exchange)Offer: Exchange. Weapon: Boycott (deprivation)

    3) Liberty/Oppression: Personal Property (freedom, liberty, self determination, opportunity seeking)

    And; 4) Truth/Face: reciprocity information Property (truth before face:M vs face before truth:F)(PACK) ARISTOCRACY – HIERARCHY – DOMINANT MALE(Capitalization – Long Term – Common Property) Offer: Defense, Safety, Order. Weapon: Force, Violence, Disorder.

    5) Sanctity/Degradation: Disgust: Normative Property (Norms, Manners, Ethics)

    And; 6) Loyalty/Betrayal: Interpersonal Property (Kinship, Ethnicity, Nationhood)

    And; 7) Authority/Subversion: Institutional Property (Religion, Hierarchy, Law)

  • Moral Foundations (instincts)

    (HERD): SOCIALIST – EQUALITARIAN – FEMALE(Consumption – Short Term – Anti-Property)Offer: Care, Affection, Sex. Weapon: Undermining, Disloyalty.

    1) Care/Harm: Redistributive Property (Welfare, Charity, Land reform)

    And; 2) Fairness/Cheating: Proportionality. Cooperative Property (Sharing, Antitrust laws, Sport rules)(SOLITARY HUNTER): LIBERTARIAN – EGALITARIAN – ASCENDENT MALE(Production – Medium Term – Property – Exchange)Offer: Exchange. Weapon: Boycott (deprivation)

    3) Liberty/Oppression: Personal Property (freedom, liberty, self determination, opportunity seeking)

    And; 4) Truth/Face: reciprocity information Property (truth before face:M vs face before truth:F)(PACK) ARISTOCRACY – HIERARCHY – DOMINANT MALE(Capitalization – Long Term – Common Property) Offer: Defense, Safety, Order. Weapon: Force, Violence, Disorder.

    5) Sanctity/Degradation: Disgust: Normative Property (Norms, Manners, Ethics)

    And; 6) Loyalty/Betrayal: Interpersonal Property (Kinship, Ethnicity, Nationhood)

    And; 7) Authority/Subversion: Institutional Property (Religion, Hierarchy, Law)

  • We Invented Truth and They Invented Lying in Response

    (important) (core)

    ............Female and Semitic vs Male and European
    .....................Dysgenics vs Eugenics
    ...................Consumption vs Capitalization
    ...........Private Consumption vs Commons Production
    ...................Undermining vs Order
    ..........Approval/Disapproval vs True/False
    ................Incrementalism vs zero tolerance
    .........Plausible Deniability vs Warranty
    .........................GSRRM vs Truth Regardless of Cost
    ......................Critique vs Falsification
    ........................Pilpul vs Justification
    .................False Promise vs Promise
    ...........Baiting into Hazard vs Offers of Reciprocity
    ......................One Herd vs Many Packs
  • We Invented Truth and They Invented Lying in Response

    (important) (core)

    ............Female and Semitic vs Male and European
    .....................Dysgenics vs Eugenics
    ...................Consumption vs Capitalization
    ...........Private Consumption vs Commons Production
    ...................Undermining vs Order
    ..........Approval/Disapproval vs True/False
    ................Incrementalism vs zero tolerance
    .........Plausible Deniability vs Warranty
    .........................GSRRM vs Truth Regardless of Cost
    ......................Critique vs Falsification
    ........................Pilpul vs Justification
    .................False Promise vs Promise
    ...........Baiting into Hazard vs Offers of Reciprocity
    ......................One Herd vs Many Packs
  • The Hierarchy of Possibilities Prevents Error

    THE HIERARCHY OF POSSIBILITIES PREVENTS ERROR By Lucas Cort SOVEREIGNTY – DOMINANT MALE The male strategy creates sovereignty IN FACT – violence and Law – establishment of action, preservation and insurance between insurers. FREEDOM – ALL Those Sovereigns then grant PERMISSION to those of lesser insurance or specializations in the division of labour to act within the limits of that permission(markets) what we call FREEDOM. If FREEDOM is used as the starting point without understanding the necessity for sovereignty that makes freedom possible, then men will not pay the cost of defending the sovereigns who create freedom. LIBERTY – ASCENDANT MALE The ascendant male navigates the permissible freedom with LIBERTY(agency, autonomy). If LIBERTY is used the starting point without understanding the necessity for the larger structures of permission and insurance to uphold that permission, the idea of liberty (autonomy) can undermine the very thing that allows it to survive through entitlement (false priors) and possible negative externalities that undermine group cohesion (think libertarianism – baiting into hazard, etc). REDISTRIBUTION – FEMALE This can be divided further into the female strategy, which has the primarily focus on empathy using social transactions to create redistribution within the group. If REDISTRIBUTION is used as the starting point, first entitlement devoid merit, then hyper consumption, and redistribution undermine the value of the structure that allows it to navigate, just as the ascendant male.