[T]RUTH, HONESTY, COSTS, JUSTIFICATION, CRITICISM COSTS OF TRUTH Hierarchy of Truths by internality to externality of costs.: 1) True enough to imagine a conceptual relationship 2) True enough for me to feel good about myself. 3) True enough for me to take actions that produce positive results. 4) True enough for me to not cause others to react negatively to me. 5) True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values. 6) True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different values. 7) True regardless of all opinions or perspectives. 8) Tautologically true: in that the two things are equal. CATEGORIES OF TRUTH 1) TRUTH: That testimony (description) you would give, if your knowledge (information) was complete, your language was sufficient, stated without error, cleansed of bias, and absent deceit, within the scope of precision limited to the context of the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possessed of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. 2) TRUTHFULNESS: that testimony (description) you give if your knowledge (information) is incomplete, your language is insufficient, you have performed due diligence in the elimination of error, imaginary content, wishful thinking, bias, and deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and which you warranty to be so; and the promise that another possessed of the knowledge, performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. 3) HONESTY: that testimony (description) you give with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. ….CATEGORIES OF HONESTY ….3.1 Demonstrated Preference: – Evidence of intuition, preference, opinion, and position as demonstrated by your actions, independent of your statements. ….3.2 Position: (criticism) – a theoretical statement that survives one’s available criticisms about external questions. ….3.3 Opinion: (justificationism) – a justified uncritical statement given the limits of one’s knowledge about external questions. ….3.4 Preference (rational expression) : a justification of one’s biases (wants). ….3.5 Intuition: (sentimental expression) – an uncritical, uncriticized, response to information that expresses a measure of existing biases (priors). JUSTIFICATION (SUPPORT) VS CRITICISM (SURVIVAL) 1) OBVERSE: We justify moral arguments given the requirement to preserve the disproportionate rewards of Cooperation, without which survival is nearly impossible. Law and Morality are Contractual, informationally complete, and open only to increases in precision – we know the first principles of cooperation. 2) REVERSE: We criticize intuitions, hypothesis, theories and laws to remove imagination, error, bias, wishful thinking, and deception from our imaginations in order to identify truth candidates. Reality is Non Contractual, informationally incomplete, and forever open to revision. We do not yet know the fist principles of the universe. The reason it took us so long to identify the meaning of truth (Testimony) was that we evolved from moral and cooperative creatures, and we evolved science from moral and cooperative and therefore justificationary reasoning. However, now that we know the first principles of cooperation we can complete the evolution of physical science by adding to it the criticisms necessary for cooperative science: Physical Science Criticisms i. identity (category) ii. internal consistency (logic) iii. external correspondence (often called empirical testing) iv. existential possibility (existence proof) v. limits (falsification) (often called parsimony) Additional Cooperative Science Criticisms: vi. full accounting (prohibition on selection bias) vii. morality (consisting of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers of property en toto)
Form: Outline
-
Property Rights and Obligations
[P]ROPERTARIANISM’S PROPERTY, PROPERTY RIGHTS, AND OBLIGATIONS CATEGORIES OF PROPERTY 0) Non-Property (Bring under total control) ….CONTROL: Total Control ….PURPOSE: Create Property ….YES: Constituo, Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, Abusus. 1) POSSESSION 2) CONSENSUAL POSSESSION 3) NORMATIVE POSSESSION INSTITUTIONAL POSSESSION – “PROPERTY” 1) Personal (Private) Property (limited control) ….PURPOSE: Acquisition Inventory and Consumption ….YES: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, ….MAYBE: Abusus 2) Shareholder (Private) Property (very limited control) ….CONTROL: Very Limited Control ….PURPOSE: Dividends from Cooperation ….YES: Fructus ….MAYBE: ?Transitus, ?Usus,?Mancipio, ….NO: Abusus 3) Common (Public) Property (All Citizen Shareholders) ….CONTROL: No control. ….PURPOSE: Prohibition on Consumption. ….MAYBE: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, ….NO: Mancipio, Abusus RIGHTS 1) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation. 2) Transitus – Transit: passage through 3d space. 3) Usus – Use: setting up a stall. 4) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits) 5) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer) 6) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo. OBLIGATIONS 1) Non-Imposition : Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer(Exchange) of property-en-toto, Free of External Imposition of Costs against Property-en-toto. PROPERTY EN TOTO (Demonstrated Property) I. SELF-PROPERTY Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.” ….a) Physical Body ….b) Actions and Time ….c) Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands. ….d) Status and Class (mate and relation selection, and reputation.) II. PERSONAL PROPERTY ….a) Several Property: Those things external to our bodies that we claim a monopoly of control over. III. KINSHIP PROPERTY ….a) Mates (access to sex/reproduction) ….b) Children (genetics) ….c) Familial Relations (security) ….d) Non-Familial Relations (utility) ….e) Consanguineous property (tribal and family ties) IV. COOPERATIVE PROPERTY ….a) Organizational ties (work) ….b) Knowledge ties (skills, crafts) V. SHAREHOLDER PROPERTY ….a) Shares: Partnership or shareholdership: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (physical shares in a tradable asset) VI. COMMON PROPERTY ….b) Commons: Unrecorded and Unquantified Shareholder Property (shares in commons) ….c) Artificial Property: (property created by fiat agreement) Intellectual Property. VII. COMMON INFORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY: ….a) Informal (Normative) Property: Our norms: manners, ethics, morals, myths, and rituals that consist of our social portfolio and which make our social order possible. VIII. COMMON FORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY ….a) Formal Institutional Property: Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws. WILSONIAN SYNTHESIS: LAW, MORALITY, PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE(TRUTH TELLING) 1) Morality: preservation of the disproportionate rewards of cooperation by a total prohibition on imposition of costs against property-en-toto. 2) Law: an evolutionary list of the accumulated prohibitions on innovations in the means of immoral actions: impositions of costs on property en toto. 3) Property Rights: The promise that third parties will warranty restitution and retaliation, and not retaliate for restitution and retaliation, for imposition of costs against property en toto in exchange for the same warranty from the defending party or parties. 4) Science: the discipline(technology) of laundering imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, and deception from testimony, leaving only truth candidates. 5) Philosophy: The discipline(technology) of improving truthful testimony. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
-
Property Rights and Obligations
[P]ROPERTARIANISM’S PROPERTY, PROPERTY RIGHTS, AND OBLIGATIONS CATEGORIES OF PROPERTY 0) Non-Property (Bring under total control) ….CONTROL: Total Control ….PURPOSE: Create Property ….YES: Constituo, Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, Abusus. 1) POSSESSION 2) CONSENSUAL POSSESSION 3) NORMATIVE POSSESSION INSTITUTIONAL POSSESSION – “PROPERTY” 1) Personal (Private) Property (limited control) ….PURPOSE: Acquisition Inventory and Consumption ….YES: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, ….MAYBE: Abusus 2) Shareholder (Private) Property (very limited control) ….CONTROL: Very Limited Control ….PURPOSE: Dividends from Cooperation ….YES: Fructus ….MAYBE: ?Transitus, ?Usus,?Mancipio, ….NO: Abusus 3) Common (Public) Property (All Citizen Shareholders) ….CONTROL: No control. ….PURPOSE: Prohibition on Consumption. ….MAYBE: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, ….NO: Mancipio, Abusus RIGHTS 1) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation. 2) Transitus – Transit: passage through 3d space. 3) Usus – Use: setting up a stall. 4) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits) 5) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer) 6) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo. OBLIGATIONS 1) Non-Imposition : Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer(Exchange) of property-en-toto, Free of External Imposition of Costs against Property-en-toto. PROPERTY EN TOTO (Demonstrated Property) I. SELF-PROPERTY Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.” ….a) Physical Body ….b) Actions and Time ….c) Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands. ….d) Status and Class (mate and relation selection, and reputation.) II. PERSONAL PROPERTY ….a) Several Property: Those things external to our bodies that we claim a monopoly of control over. III. KINSHIP PROPERTY ….a) Mates (access to sex/reproduction) ….b) Children (genetics) ….c) Familial Relations (security) ….d) Non-Familial Relations (utility) ….e) Consanguineous property (tribal and family ties) IV. COOPERATIVE PROPERTY ….a) Organizational ties (work) ….b) Knowledge ties (skills, crafts) V. SHAREHOLDER PROPERTY ….a) Shares: Partnership or shareholdership: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (physical shares in a tradable asset) VI. COMMON PROPERTY ….b) Commons: Unrecorded and Unquantified Shareholder Property (shares in commons) ….c) Artificial Property: (property created by fiat agreement) Intellectual Property. VII. COMMON INFORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY: ….a) Informal (Normative) Property: Our norms: manners, ethics, morals, myths, and rituals that consist of our social portfolio and which make our social order possible. VIII. COMMON FORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY ….a) Formal Institutional Property: Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws. WILSONIAN SYNTHESIS: LAW, MORALITY, PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE(TRUTH TELLING) 1) Morality: preservation of the disproportionate rewards of cooperation by a total prohibition on imposition of costs against property-en-toto. 2) Law: an evolutionary list of the accumulated prohibitions on innovations in the means of immoral actions: impositions of costs on property en toto. 3) Property Rights: The promise that third parties will warranty restitution and retaliation, and not retaliate for restitution and retaliation, for imposition of costs against property en toto in exchange for the same warranty from the defending party or parties. 4) Science: the discipline(technology) of laundering imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, and deception from testimony, leaving only truth candidates. 5) Philosophy: The discipline(technology) of improving truthful testimony. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
-
THE EXPANSION OF PERCEPTION 1) All language is allegory to experience. The most
THE EXPANSION OF PERCEPTION
1) All language is allegory to experience. The most complex terms are simply increasingly loaded combinations of basic experiences.
2) as we evolved, the content of our communication changed: things that are deducible or imaginable rather than visible, audible etc.
2) Our experiences are limited. We can only sense so much on our own, with the physical bodies that we have to work with.
3) Language allows us to collect a greater range of experiences than we can on our own. Even experiences separated by time and space.
4) Our ‘calculative’ (not computational) ability is limited. We can only ‘figure out’ so much on our own.
5) Language allows others to help us calculate what we could not calculate on our own.
6) Systems of measurement allow us to ‘sense’ what we cannot sense with our senses alone.
7) Systems of calculation and computation let us compare and contrast what we cannot figure out on our own.
8 ) Language, Measurement, and Calculation and Reason allow us to extend our perceptions, and to create symbols that we can manipulate with the limited abilities that we do possess.
9) The purpose of philosophy is to test, integrate, reconstruct, rearrange, evaluate, prioritize and articulate our body of knowledge to our advantage given the new information available to our senses by way of our tools, measurements, communications, and calculations, so that we can make best use of the information at our disposal.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-27 11:24:00 UTC
-
EDUCATION We do it wrong. 1) Reading and writing. 2) Testimony( witness, grammar
EDUCATION
We do it wrong.
1) Reading and writing.
2) Testimony( witness, grammar, rhetoric, logic, moral law, contract). 3) History(technical,organizational,economic,artistic).
4) Arithmetic( arithmetic, checkbooks, accounting, credit and interest, banking),
5) Mathematics(algebra, trigonometry, statistics, calculus),
6) Economics (micro-economics, institutions of cooperation, macro-economics).
7) Physics(physics, chemistry, biology).
Note the absence of politics and indoctrination.
Get a job as young as you can. Youth employment not immigrant employment. Elderly employment, not immigrant employment.
Travel for a year or two in your late teens. Borrowing to travel is the best investment you can make in your youth. Parochialism is the greatest liability you can most easily overcome. ( Look at the Mormons )
Or do two years in military service learning emergency skills, crowd control, civil defense, and the basics of weapons, fire, movement, communication and fitness.
Then go to college. If you go to college you can learn a skill: a quantitative discipline. Or you can seek entertainment: non-quantitative fields.
College is a *shitty* filter with not enough variation in filtration. Little of it is useful. And universities teach and distribute cathedral ignorance. Learning selflessness, cooperation, variation, emergency and fighting teaches you to be successful regardless of what technical skill you possess.
Then learn a technical skill: the hardest that you can manage and feel confident in using.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-27 03:12:00 UTC
-
ON THE DARK ENLIGHTENMENT RAMZPAUL’S POINTS 1) The Counter-Enlightenment was tak
https://gloria.tv/media/7TcJehsj2GJRAMZPAUL ON THE DARK ENLIGHTENMENT
RAMZPAUL’S POINTS
1) The Counter-Enlightenment was taken already. But this is a counter-enlightenment movement. The Dark Enlightenment. (I disagree with conflating the dark ages and the middle ages. Western civic society is largely the result of the late middle ages, not dark ages.)
2) The Cathedral includes the Academy, The Media, The State, The Deep State.
3) The Religion of the Cathedral is Cultural Marxism : Having failed scientifically (Scientific Socialism), Having failed organizationally (Syndicalism), Having failed through Postmodernism (lying) AND having started with demand for access to opportunity, expanded their demands to equality of opportunity, and having expanded their demands to equality of outcome, and failing because of the empirical difference in ability between individuals, the only solution was to import vast numbers of underclass people from the third world, encourage single motherhood, destroy the family, and create dependence upon the state sufficient that the state could take control of all functions in life.
3) Red Pill : Accepting the truth of the evidence of man’s behavior and abandoning the enlightenment fallacies.
4) Inequality and Diversity: People are empirically unequal, and Diversity empirically decreases trust and increases demand for tyranny. (The reason we are unequal is largely the difference in rates of reproduction of our classes. While homo-sapiens of the various races are similar, we vary in the success at suppressing our underclass reproduction. Those who succeed have advanced societies, and those who failed have impoverished societies. The cold solved this problem for us. The underclasses are a problem. Everywhere and always.)
5) Democracy: Democracy is the worst possible system because it is dependent upon lies not reality or scientific reality, and surrenders control to the lower classes and elites who pander to them.
CURT DOOLITTLE’S EXPLANATIONS
The purpose of the enlightenment
0) To end the Aristocratic Rule of the Landed Monarchies, and the Landed Church.
1) To justify the middle class takeover of government (means of producing commons) from the landed aristocracy.
2) To justify the diminution of religion and religious mysticism in favor of science and reason, assisting in the middle class takeover of the government.
The Fallacy of the Enlightenment
1) That it was possible to create an aristocracy of everyone. It’s not possible because meritocracy is not in the interest of the underclasses. Parasitism is.
The Institutional Error
1) Instead of creating a new house for the middle class, and then a new house for proletarians, which would have made it possible for classes to conduct exchanges, we created a single house with majority rule and as a consequence, found that the lower classes, and women in particular had no interest in the aristocracy everyone, and instead, voted to incrementally destroy the aristocratic civilization we call ‘the west’.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-25 13:51:00 UTC
-
TRUTH, HONESTY, COSTS, JUSTIFICATION, CRITICISM COSTS OF TRUTH Hierarchy of Trut
TRUTH, HONESTY, COSTS, JUSTIFICATION, CRITICISM
COSTS OF TRUTH
Hierarchy of Truths by internality to externality of costs.:
1) True enough to imagine a conceptual relationship
2) True enough for me to feel good about myself.
3) True enough for me to take actions that produce positive results.
4) True enough for me to not cause others to react negatively to me.
5) True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values.
6) True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different values.
7) True regardless of all opinions or perspectives.
8) Tautologically true: in that the two things are equal.
CATEGORIES OF TRUTH
1) TRUTH: That testimony (description) you would give, if your knowledge (information) was complete, your language was sufficient, stated without error, cleansed of bias, and absent deceit, within the scope of precision limited to the context of the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possessed of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
2) TRUTHFULNESS: that testimony (description) you give if your knowledge (information) is incomplete, your language is insufficient, you have performed due diligence in the elimination of error, imaginary content, wishful thinking, bias, and deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and which you warranty to be so; and the promise that another possessed of the knowledge, performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
3) HONESTY: that testimony (description) you give with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
….CATEGORIES OF HONESTY
….3.1 Demonstrated Preference: – Evidence of intuition, preference, opinion, and position as demonstrated by your actions, independent of your statements.
….3.2 Position: (criticism) – a theoretical statement that survives one’s available criticisms about external questions.
….3.3 Opinion: (justificationism) – a justified uncritical statement given the limits of one’s knowledge about external questions.
….3.4 Preference (rational expression) : a justification of one’s biases (wants).
….3.5 Intuition: (sentimental expression) – an uncritical, uncriticized, response to information that expresses a measure of existing biases (priors).
JUSTIFICATION (SUPPORT) VS CRITICISM (SURVIVAL)
1) OBVERSE: We justify moral arguments given the requirement to preserve the disproportionate rewards of Cooperation, without which survival is nearly impossible. Law and Morality are Contractual, informationally complete, and open only to increases in precision – we know the first principles of cooperation.
2) REVERSE: We criticize intuitions, hypothesis, theories and laws to remove imagination, error, bias, wishful thinking, and deception from our imaginations in order to identify truth candidates. Reality is Non Contractual, informationally incomplete, and forever open to revision. We do not yet know the fist principles of the universe.
The reason it took us so long to identify the meaning of truth (Testimony) was that we evolved from moral and cooperative creatures, and we evolved science from moral and cooperative and therefore justificationary reasoning. However, now that we know the first principles of cooperation we can complete the evolution of physical science by adding to it the criticisms necessary for cooperative science:
Physical Science Criticisms
i. identity (category)
ii. internal consistency (logic)
iii. external correspondence (often called empirical testing)
iv. existential possibility (existence proof)
v. limits (falsification) (often called parsimony)
Additional Cooperative Science Criticisms:
vi. full accounting (prohibition on selection bias)
vii. morality (consisting of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers of property en toto)
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-21 11:38:00 UTC
-
PROPERTARIANISM’S PROPERTY, PROPERTY RIGHTS, AND OBLIGATIONS CATEGORIES OF PROPE
PROPERTARIANISM’S PROPERTY, PROPERTY RIGHTS, AND OBLIGATIONS
CATEGORIES OF PROPERTY
0) Non-Property (Bring under total control)
….CONTROL: Total Control
….PURPOSE: Create Property
….YES: Constituo, Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, Abusus.
1) Personal (Private) Property (limited control)
….PURPOSE: Acquisition Inventory and Consumption
….YES: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio,
….MAYBE: Abusus
2) Shareholder (Private) Property (very limited control)
….CONTROL: Very Limited Control
….PURPOSE: Dividends from Cooperation
….YES: Fructus
….MAYBE: ?Transitus, ?Usus,?Mancipio,
….NO: Abusus
3) Common (Public) Property (All Citizen Shareholders)
….CONTROL: No control.
….PURPOSE: Prohibition on Consumption.
….MAYBE: Transitus, Usus, Fructus,
….NO: Mancipio, Abusus
RIGHTS
1) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation.
2) Transitus – Transit: passage through 3d space.
3) Usus – Use: setting up a stall.
4) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits)
5) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer)
6) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo.
OBLIGATIONS
1) Non-Imposition : Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer(Exchange) of property-en-toto, Free of External Imposition of Costs against Property-en-toto.
PROPERTY EN TOTO (Demonstrated Property)
I. SELF-PROPERTY
Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.”
….a) Physical Body
….b) Actions and Time
….c) Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands.
….d) Status and Class (mate and relation selection, and reputation.)
II. PERSONAL PROPERTY
….a) Several Property: Those things external to our bodies that we claim a monopoly of control over.
III. KINSHIP PROPERTY
….a) Mates (access to sex/reproduction)
….b) Children (genetics)
….c) Familial Relations (security)
….d) Non-Familial Relations (utility)
….e) Consanguineous property (tribal and family ties)
IV. COOPERATIVE PROPERTY
….a) Organizational ties (work)
….b) Knowledge ties (skills, crafts)
V. SHAREHOLDER PROPERTY
….a) Shares: Partnership or shareholdership: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (physical shares in a tradable asset)
VI. COMMON PROPERTY
….b) Commons: Unrecorded and Unquantified Shareholder Property (shares in commons)
….c) Artificial Property: (property created by fiat agreement) Intellectual Property.
VII. COMMON INFORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY:
….a) Informal (Normative) Property: Our norms: manners, ethics, morals, myths, and rituals that consist of our social portfolio and which make our social order possible.
VIII. COMMON FORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY
….a) Formal Institutional Property: Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws.
WILSONIAN SYNTHESIS: LAW, MORALITY, PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE(TRUTH TELLING)
1) Morality: preservation of the disproportionate rewards of cooperation by a total prohibition on imposition of costs against property-en-toto.
2) Law: an evolutionary list of the accumulated prohibitions on innovations in the means of immoral actions: impositions of costs on property en toto.
3) Property Rights: The promise that third parties will warranty restitution and retaliation, and not retaliate for restitution and retaliation, for imposition of costs against property en toto in exchange for the same warranty from the defending party or parties.
4) Science: the discipline(technology) of laundering imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, and deception from testimony, leaving only truth candidates.
5) Philosophy: The discipline(technology) of improving truthful testimony.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-21 11:37:00 UTC
-
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMICS, COOPERATION, And ACQUISITION 0) Existence 1)
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMICS, COOPERATION, And ACQUISITION
0) Existence
1) Acquisition (Property, Planning, Calculating)
2) Cooperation (Necessary Morality, Property, Rights)
3) Micro Economics (Causation, Reducing Friction of Cooperation)
4) Macro Econometrics (Correlation, Observation of Externalities)
5) Macro Economic Monetary Policy (Interference, Coercion)
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-21 11:31:00 UTC
-
THE FIRST PRINCIPLES OF PROPERTARIAN ETHICS (revised and expanded)(worth repeati
THE FIRST PRINCIPLES OF PROPERTARIAN ETHICS
(revised and expanded)(worth repeating)
0 — Man is a costly form of life in an unpredictable universe.
1 – Man must acquire resources to live amid this unpredictable universe.
2 – Man must act to acquire and inventory resources:
3 — Man must defend that which he has acquired and inventoried. (His property is demonstrated by what he defends from loss, and what he retaliates for imposition of costs upon.)
4 – Man demonstrates that he acquires and defends:
……4.1 Life, Time, Rest, Memories, Actions, Social Status, Reputation
……4.2 Mates (access to sex/reproduction), Children (genetics), Familial Relations (security), Non-Familial Relations (utility),Consanguineous property (tribal and family ties)
……4.3 Organizational ties (work), Knowledge ties (skills, crafts), Insurance (community)
……4.4 Several Property: Those things external to our bodies that we claim a monopoly of control over, having obtained them without imposing costs upon others.
……4.5 Shareholder Property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (physical shares in a tradable asset), Commons: Unrecorded and Unquantified Shareholder Property (shares in commons), Artificial Property: (property created by fiat agreement) Intellectual Property.
……4.6 Informal (Normative) Property: Our norms: manners, ethics, morals, myths, and rituals that consist of our social portfolio and which make our social order possible.
……4.7 Formal Institutional Property: Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws.
5 – Man must act cooperatively to disproportionately improve acquisition of resources. (Cooperation is disproportionately more rewarding than any other activity.)
6 – Man must only cooperate where it is beneficial and preferable to non-cooperation. As such all cooperative actions or sets of actions, must result in:
……5.1 Productive (increases property)
……5.2 Fully Informed (without deceit – a form of discounting)
……5.3 Warrantied (promise of non parasitism warranty of restitution)
……5.4 Voluntary Exchange
……5.5 Free of negative externality (imposes no costs on the property of third parties).
7 – Man must act to preserve and extend cooperation to preserve the disproportionate rewards of acquisition through cooperation. (Cooperation is itself a disproportionately valuable scarcity)
8 – Man acts to preserve and extend cooperation by the suppression of parasitism that creates the disincentive to cooperate, and therefore decreases the disproportionate rewards of acquisition through cooperation. (Man evolved necessary and expensive moral intuitions to preserve cooperation – including expensive forms of punishment of offenders.)
9 – Man engages in parasitism by:
……7.1 violence,
……7.2 theft,
……7.3 fraud, fraud by obscurantism, fraud by moralizing, fraud by omission,
……7.4 externality, free riding, privatization of commons, socialization of losses,
……7.5 conspiracy, conversion, immigration, conquest, war and genocide. (Violence, Theft, Fraud, Externality, and Conspiracy.)
10 – Man suppresses parasitism by threats of interpersonal violence, promises of interpersonal violence, interpersonal violence, interpersonal ostracization from cooperation, organized ostracization via norms and commerce, when he must by remuneration, and when he can by organized violence in law and war.
……10.1 Man possesses three weapons of influence: violence(imposition of material costs), gossip(imposition of opportunity costs: ostracization-inclusion), and remuneration(transfer of assets: exchange).
……10.2 Man uses all three weapons of influences, usually in concert, to different degrees.
……10.3 Some men specialize in one weapon of influence: Warriors, Sheriffs and judges: Violence; priests and public intellectuals: Gossip; Organizers of Production: Remuneration.
11 – The most rapid means by which man can organize the suppression of parasitism is by defining property rights as all demonstrated property, and creating a court of universal standing under the common law, under the rule of law before a jury of his peers – since any innovation in parasitism is suppressed by the creation of a new prohibition with the first suit adjudicated. (Common, organically evolutionary law most rapidly prevents expansion of demonstrated parasitic opportunities.)
12 – A market for goods and services produces consumables, but a market for commons produces non-consumables. Non-consumable goods that provide utility whether those goods be privately constructed (use by private shareholders only) or publicly constructed (use by all citizen-shareholders). Commons (whether physical, normative or institutional) provide a disproportionate return to shareholders by preventing consumption and preserving utility.
— dissent and adjudication not assent and confirmation –
–division of cognitive labor–
— the family-regulation of reproduction–
13 – A condition of liberty is constructed when all men, including those who participate in the construction of commons – members of the government – are equally bound by the prohibition on parasitism: the common law against parasitism. (Morality is a synonym for non-parasitism. Liberty is a synonym for a moral – meaning non-parasitic – government.)
14 – A condition of both interpersonal morality, and it’s mirror: legal liberty, both forces all human action necessary for man’s survival into productive participation in the market by denying parasitism, and reduces or eliminates transaction costs (frictions due to risk), which in turn maximizes the potential economic velocity of the group.
15 – If one does not engage in parasitism by doing so, the forcible increase of the suppression of others’ free riding is always by definition moral and just. This increases the possibilities of prosperity for all men. (Legal colonialism is moral. Economic colonialism is not.) (Aristocracy is obliged to increase the pool of aristocratic people whenever possible, and affordable.)
There is no competitive strategy greater than the suppression of parasitism in all it’s forms. Because all human effort is limited to the market for productive ends, and all market activity is conducted under the lowest possible speculative friction.
The optimum group evolutionary strategy is to suppress all parasitism, while constantly driving up it’s intelligence by suppressing the reproduction of its lower classes (non performers). This causes no harm, and produces the greatest and longest term competitive benefit.)
If many groups follow this strategy, the largest group with the highest median IQ and aggression (competitive energy) will produce the most innovation.
Some groups cannot compete. So they will continue to act as parasites. (Gypsies).
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-19 23:20:00 UTC